Theme: Productivity

  • NUT DEVELOPMENT I’ve Been building software since the 70’s. In the late 80’s I u

    https://medium.com/@belisarius222/how-to-start-a-software-project-ad51373c1510#.t8pga6dzbLUG NUT DEVELOPMENT

    I’ve Been building software since the 70’s.

    In the late 80’s I use Agile before it had a name.

    This “Lug Nut” development is how I do software development today.

    “Just make it work. Refactor as soon as you figure out how.”

    Make no unnecessary investments.

    WHY HAVE WE ADOPTED THIS NEW METHODOLOGY?

    The cost of development, the cost of complile time, the cost of publishing updates once problems are found, have eliminated the value of attempting to imitate engineering, and we have migrated to the process of publishing documents that constantly are subject to editorial revision.

    I have said for decades that what we do is discourse to develop hypotheses and theories with our machines — that we do not practice engineering.

    It was the cost of construction of our discourse that made us imitate engineering and construction methods. In the present, we no longer engineer, we function far more like a debating society trying to discover a solution, and constantly updating our text.

    THE CUSTOMER PROBLEM

    But while this method is particularly useful for product and internal development, the customer is your enemy and his own enemy if you do not manage his fantasies.

    So this technique only possible (as is common) with experienced customers.

    We must undestand that develoment has never beeen a problem.

    The customers have always been the problem.

    They want to obtain retail purchases, and control a production process, for what is essentially a program of research and development.

    THE AUTHORING (DEVELOPER) PROBLEM

    And meanwhile, the lazy, unintelligent, and unskilled developers that seduce ignorant customers into employing them far above their skill levels export this behavior to the world. And customers desperate to compete by saving money on research and development are taken advantage of by the vast hordes of frauds in this business hoping to find suckers to finance their personal development and then move on, leaving the customer with failure and disappointment.

    ONE THING WE FAIL TO DO

    Technologists have not professionalized the industry in order to protect customers from unqualified craftsmen and thereby raise their rates and eliminate this problem of expectations. There is no test like the Bar, or public accountancy.

    What we do have is reputations. And we should be vicious in our recommendations of those who harm our industry with their behavior.

    PUNISH THE WICKED TO DEFEND THE COMMONS.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 08:42:00 UTC

  • It is very hard to get the full package. For either gender. Pretty Vs fit and cl

    It is very hard to get the full package.

    For either gender.

    Pretty Vs fit and clean.

    Feminine. Vs charismatic

    Caring and nurturing. Vs careerist and productive.

    Positive. Vs gets things done.

    Smart (enough) vs smarter.

    Not crazy. Vs not impulsive

    Not clingy vs not seeking mommy.

    Living over here makes American men seem like effeminate losers.

    Women ruined America the experiment failed.

    Look on the mirror.

    That’s why.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 13:36:00 UTC

  • We allowed people to profit from degeneracy rather than prohibiting profit by ot

    We allowed people to profit from degeneracy rather than prohibiting profit by other’s labors.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 08:03:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710013698509807616

    Reply addressees: @CanadaNRx @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992

  • Imagine the market for entertainment if copyrights were eliminated: Labors of lo

    Imagine the market for entertainment if copyrights were eliminated: Labors of love would still be produced. Profiting via degeneracy wouldnt


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:43:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710008569568075776

  • Women create demands. Merchants organize production. Warriors to set limits. No

    Women create demands. Merchants organize production. Warriors to set limits. No group is wise enough alone. Exchange is our test of truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:27:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710004573545635840

  • THE LIMITS OF THE MORALITY OF PROFIT #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #

    THE LIMITS OF THE MORALITY OF PROFIT
    #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #propertarianism https://t.co/DObQrU6Fjp


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 05:08:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709969685983453184

  • Patents as off-book investment in high risk invention are a discreet tool in tho

    Patents as off-book investment in high risk invention are a discreet tool in those cases where the market won’t do. Not a general strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:53:00 UTC

  • LIMITS OF THE MORALITY OF PROFIT #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #prop

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/709969685983453184/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=709969685983453184THE LIMITS OF THE MORALITY OF PROFIT

    #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #propertarianism https://t.co/DObQrU6Fjp


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 01:09:00 UTC

  • Every involuntary transfer is a lost opportunity for voluntary exchange. Particu

    Every involuntary transfer is a lost opportunity for voluntary exchange. Particularly between the impulsive classes and the productive.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 16:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708684131761319936

  • Eliminate the ability of man to engage in parasitism and you leave him only the

    Eliminate the ability of man to engage in parasitism and you leave him only the ability to engage in productivity.

    Eliminate the ability of man to engage in error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deception and you leave him only the ability to speak the truth.

    Eliminate the ability to pool and launder taxes and eliminate discretion.

    Eliminate discretion and you eliminate the eliminate the ability of man to engage in politics.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 22:24:00 UTC