Theme: Productivity

  • Interest on production is necessary to measure use of the universe’s resources.

    Interest on production is necessary to measure use of the universe’s resources. But Interest on consumption is parasitism. You are a serf.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 03:08:00 UTC

  • You pay interest on consumer goods, while businesses do not? This is the inverse

    You pay interest on consumer goods, while businesses do not? This is the inverse of what is necessary. Theorize Production. Satisfy Demand.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 03:04:00 UTC

  • The greatest economic potential of the continent is waiting to be set free. Free

    The greatest economic potential of the continent is waiting to be set free. Free the Nine. OUR EVOLUTION REQUIRES DEVOLUTION. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 02:56:00 UTC

  • You are too worried about books: the big bang. I’m concerned with volume. Repeti

    You are too worried about books: the big bang. I’m concerned with volume. Repetition. Training. Application. Nuance. Hence: “Be Prolific”.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 12:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716596486956589057

  • The reason you succeed in business – other than luck; You correctly understand h

    The reason you succeed in business – other than luck;

    You correctly understand human beings.

    You sell people what they want not what you want to sell them.

    You sell it with greater value to them than all alternatives.

    You are able to sell greater value to them than the alternatives because you’ve mastered it.

    Austrian economics is the study of mans incentives. And economics the langu


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 07:25:00 UTC

  • High IQ = Organization of production, Invention. So yes

    High IQ = Organization of production, Invention. So yes.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 05:16:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714682726729777153

    Reply addressees: @Inline_Sixx @SpiritSplice @MartianHoplite @ThomasEWoods @zslayback

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714675855881060353


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714675855881060353

  • I think, that if I could say something useful to young libertarian and conservat

    I think, that if I could say something useful to young libertarian and conservative men and women, it would be that fulfillment and money are increasingly difficult to find in combination. Worse, you cannot any longer look for insurance from a stable family. Worse, it is now nearly impossible to save for your old age once you’re married – and are destined to be elderly, lonely, and poor. Worse, the world has been engineered since at least the 1960’s to destroy your traditions, your families, your people, and your futures with just as deliberate a plan as the extermination of the Jews. Except that this deliberate plan has been conducted by pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-scientific fraud, the intentional erasure of rule of law, and the gradual financialization and impoverishment of your peoples through a process of continuous financial extraction. So your feeling of ‘this isn’t right’ is an insight not just an intuition. It’s not right. You’re being exterminated. So what can you do? You can let it happen, right? Or we can change the world forever, and obtain retribution and restitution from those who have committed these socio economic war crimes. To change the world I would recommend to find a job that makes money. To see social fulfillment in like minds. To develop knlowlege of the world. To maintain adequate health and fitness. And to work in as many small ways as possible toward the revolution that we need to create. There is no one else to do it but you. It’s your time. It’s your era. You are the generation that will save your families, your people, your culture, your civilization from genocide. But that revolution will not require money and passion. It will require knowledge and fitness. Our history of revolutions is depednet upon the democxratic narrative of popular will, popular press, and taking to the streets. This is not the revolution we will provide. Why? Because we do not need millions, we do not need money. We do not really need weapons. Money, millions and weapons are strategies that the enemy knows how to wield. We need to establish our demands, raise the cost of the status quo until they are met. To make the state ungovernable. And to take selective actions until the demands are met or the state and economy collapse. Why is this important? Because if we are a credible enough threat, then none of the unpleasant need happen. But if we are not a credible threat, then we will need to make the unpleasant happen in order to become a credible threat. fortunately or not, the timing is arriving a little faster than most of us anticipated. But we will create a network, and start educating in the positives and the negatives. The solutions and the threats. There are those of us who will instill passions, those of us who will spread solutions, and those of us who will suggest plans, and those of us who will take actions. I am fairly sure that I understand how this will play out. But it will play out. And we will succeed. Punish the wicked. Try the guilty. Change the laws. And never again will we be subject to fraud as a means of genocide against our people. But as last resort, if all else fails, we can just kill them all by spitting them upon pikes at every entrance and exit to this the west.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 11:04:00 UTC

  • All. I succeeded in business because I applied what we call austrian economics t

    All.

    I succeeded in business because I applied what we call austrian economics to various industries using technology.

    I am trained as an artist. I think as a scientist, and I practice either social science or philosophy depending upon your point of view.

    When I was in business full time it was common (since the time I was 21) to ask why I was not teaching in university. (Because I am not tolerant of authority or slave labor, and I like making money.) In business I felt a philosopher that was ‘slumming’ for cash.

    I’m a philosopher. That is my art. Business is a craft. I build technology. Some men sell books. Some men sell teaching. Some men work in Patent Offices. Some learn their craft in Law or Politics. Some like Spinoza grind glass lenses.

    No one is going to remember me for building one of ten thousand technology companies during the birth of mass information age.

    And certainly not for creating services companies. Technology is a way of making money. Technology gives you access to many, many businesses and business models. Working with technology is a little like pscyhology of facilitation rather than the psychology of dysfunction. Working with philosophy is a little like working with the psychology of cooperation and morality rather than people who are broken. But for me, business is an experimental workshop that pays me money, and where I don’t have to justify my work to some committee. Profit is enough justification.

    But I”m a philosopher. Not a business man. Spinoza was a philosopher not a lens grinder. The fact that I undrestand business is a consequence of understanding man. Those who do not understand business merely do not understand man.

    If you put it that way, then you understand just how little the world understands of man.

    Learning philosophy, history, and economics, is to learn man.

    Everything else is the subject of the physical world, or the lies we tell one another to avoid costs and gain premiums.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 08:00:00 UTC

  • Man asks me, “Working?” “Of course. Always. We are men. We must work.” “Yes.” (l

    Man asks me, “Working?”

    “Of course. Always. We are men. We must work.”

    “Yes.” (laughter)

    “Otherwise the women will give us even worse things to do at home.”

    “Oohhh, yes!” (room full of laughter)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 10:21:00 UTC

  • Why aren’t more philosophers entrepreneurs? There are many entrepreneurs and few

    Why aren’t more philosophers entrepreneurs? There are many entrepreneurs and few philosophers. Entrepreneurship and philosophy are time consuming activities. And honestly, contributing to philosophy is far harder than contributing to the economy via entrepreneurship. To combine entrepreneurship and philosphy requires selling books. Selling books for income requires writing books frequently. Philosophical problems are not solve with frequency, or in short time frames.

    Spinoza ground lenses and lived poorly and died young having the same asthma as I. I write software, live well and have outlived him despite the asthma. He spent his whole life writing a parsimonious two hundred pages.

    The university allows you to report your progress while teaching, to practice the art of lecture and distillation of ideas. And to capture the results of both in your books. And so the university provides the optimum environment for writing whatever you’re writing about.

    The question is wether writing in that environment leads you to conclusions and whether writing in the business environment leads you to different conclusions.

    It appears so.

    It also appears that it is far costlier and therefore less common to write philosophy while also working on entrepreneurship.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:18:00 UTC