Theme: Productivity

  • it is easy for children to imitate. It is difficult for adults to innovate. Supr

    it is easy for children to imitate. It is difficult for adults to innovate. Supremacy is a fact of history now. The fact that the west dragged Y’all out of ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of nature is simply fact.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 11:55:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059051488390078464

    Reply addressees: @karnawatabhiman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058941912709763072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @karnawatabhiman

    @curtdoolittle Also according to ray dalio India and China will have around a ppp adjusted per capita equal to west by 2050,so much for the psuedoscientific racial /western supermacy quackery

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058941912709763072

  • How Germany Made Use of Second Mover Advantage:

    BRITAIN VS GERMANY (how germany made use of second mover advantage: england betamax, germany vhs) By Aaron Kahland [I]’ll start by addressing education. Let’s take the metric of universities. Germany had more than ten before 16th century concluded whilst England’s third university was first founded in 1824 and Oxbridge were largely confined to theology and law. The protestant reformation led to compulsory education in Germany well before it was commonplace in England. The pietist movement in Germany led to the concept of ‘Bildung’ or a general education in the humanities which led to a revival of the study of the Classics. By the 19th century, whilst the Britons were busying themselves with superficial comparisons between Victorian and Roman periods, Germans were discovering places like Troy. By 1933, Germany had more Nobel Prize winners than all English speakers on the planet combined. But that is actually a poor metric considering that Germany invented the modern university and it became the model for the rest of the world and, importantly, the United States. I want to emphasize that i am not entirely convinced that the general education of the average German was better than that of the average Briton. Perhaps it was, perhaps it was not – I really don’t know. A good indicator might be book sales and what books were being sold in the 19th century. However, I would argue that by the 19th century, the upper 5% of Germans were better educated than Britons – and this is reflected in the fact that the Second Industrial Revolution occurred not in Britain but Germany. Whilst Britain was the origin of the Scientific Revolution – the Germans scholars absolutely embraced it and built their deucational institutions using the scientific method as a foundation. In fact I might argue that German philosophy was a response / reaction to that tremendous pace of scientific advance. By the 19th century in both France and Britain – Germany became synonymous with science and France had entirely given up hope of ever competing. It came to be understood, in Europe, that there was something peculiar about German civilization that provided it a technological advantage over others. It was this second Industrial Revolution – the fact that Germany now completely dominated electrics, machine tools, chemicals, pharmaceuticals that, in my view, was the cause of this civilizational conflict. By the late 19th Century the British ruling classes were determined to build a global Empire that would be run by a global English-speaking elite – the Rhodes Scholarship was established precisely for the purpose of selecting this elite on merit. Germany however, was the obstacle to achieving this because of her scientific advancement. (I baited Aaron Kahland into this post. He didn’t bite. So I just outright asked him. This is the result. lol -hugs )

  • How Germany Made Use of Second Mover Advantage:

    BRITAIN VS GERMANY (how germany made use of second mover advantage: england betamax, germany vhs) By Aaron Kahland [I]’ll start by addressing education. Let’s take the metric of universities. Germany had more than ten before 16th century concluded whilst England’s third university was first founded in 1824 and Oxbridge were largely confined to theology and law. The protestant reformation led to compulsory education in Germany well before it was commonplace in England. The pietist movement in Germany led to the concept of ‘Bildung’ or a general education in the humanities which led to a revival of the study of the Classics. By the 19th century, whilst the Britons were busying themselves with superficial comparisons between Victorian and Roman periods, Germans were discovering places like Troy. By 1933, Germany had more Nobel Prize winners than all English speakers on the planet combined. But that is actually a poor metric considering that Germany invented the modern university and it became the model for the rest of the world and, importantly, the United States. I want to emphasize that i am not entirely convinced that the general education of the average German was better than that of the average Briton. Perhaps it was, perhaps it was not – I really don’t know. A good indicator might be book sales and what books were being sold in the 19th century. However, I would argue that by the 19th century, the upper 5% of Germans were better educated than Britons – and this is reflected in the fact that the Second Industrial Revolution occurred not in Britain but Germany. Whilst Britain was the origin of the Scientific Revolution – the Germans scholars absolutely embraced it and built their deucational institutions using the scientific method as a foundation. In fact I might argue that German philosophy was a response / reaction to that tremendous pace of scientific advance. By the 19th century in both France and Britain – Germany became synonymous with science and France had entirely given up hope of ever competing. It came to be understood, in Europe, that there was something peculiar about German civilization that provided it a technological advantage over others. It was this second Industrial Revolution – the fact that Germany now completely dominated electrics, machine tools, chemicals, pharmaceuticals that, in my view, was the cause of this civilizational conflict. By the late 19th Century the British ruling classes were determined to build a global Empire that would be run by a global English-speaking elite – the Rhodes Scholarship was established precisely for the purpose of selecting this elite on merit. Germany however, was the obstacle to achieving this because of her scientific advancement. (I baited Aaron Kahland into this post. He didn’t bite. So I just outright asked him. This is the result. lol -hugs )

  • And organizing a polity for rent suppression comes first. Hence prussia/german a

    And organizing a polity for rent suppression comes first. Hence prussia/german and china, vs south america and india.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:43:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057025041064435713

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. fundamentally different topic, which is how well economic policy is doing in delivering performance on particular variables that tend to correlate with perceptions of how well they‘re doing. Of course there is error in asserting that these determine perception completely….

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308

  • Well, i wont’ intrude on your thread, but it’s not a different topic but it’s de

    Well, i wont’ intrude on your thread, but it’s not a different topic but it’s dependent. -“No, the point of capitalistic agents is to maximize profit given the constraints of the market.”- But if and only if the easier method (rents) are not available to them. Rents come first.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:42:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024844670386176

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. fundamentally different topic, which is how well economic policy is doing in delivering performance on particular variables that tend to correlate with perceptions of how well they‘re doing. Of course there is error in asserting that these determine perception completely….

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308

  • 17) … for no other purpose than pursuing dysgenia, destruction of capital, the

    17) … for no other purpose than pursuing dysgenia, destruction of capital, the manufacture of ignorance, in the 3500 year struggle of the primitive peoples (equalitarian poverty and ignorance) against the advancing peoples (meritocratic wealth and knowledge).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:39:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055453750259867651

    Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jonas_Ceika

    @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680

  • 14) Because it was this group strategy (today called “OODA Loops” in military, a

    14) Because it was this group strategy (today called “OODA Loops” in military, and “innovation” in economics, technology, and science, that allowed western civ in the ancient and modern worlds, to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, poverty, labor, and suffering.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:34:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055452451107692545

    Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jonas_Ceika

    @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680

  • GOOD STUFF: LIFE LESSONS OF A CEO Some of My Favorite, Oft-Repeated Sayings as a

    GOOD STUFF: LIFE LESSONS OF A CEO

    Some of My Favorite, Oft-Repeated Sayings as a CEO:

    “Understanding is Overrated”

    “Agreement is an unnecessary luxury”

    “A consulting company in particular, but a sales organization in general, are first and foremost intelligence agencies.”

    “An intelligence agency’s strategy is ‘insert and expand’” (that one always got laughs)

    “The truth is the optimum form of argument. If you can’t argue with the truth you are too ignorant to argue your point.”

    “Good advertising is the truth spoken elegantly and succinctly” (that’s not mine, but it is the golden rule of marketing and advertising.).

    “If you’re in fact, any good, overinvest in customer acquisition and retention – win desirable deals. Only play the numbers game if you suck. Most people suck.”

    “The reason you can’t improve your market position is because no one good enough to change your market position will work for you. Either be a better person for the upper 10% (in actuality, 1%) to work for or replace yourself with someone who is.”

    “It’s a lot harder to say no, and a lot easier to take bad news, from a an attractive and competent woman. We win deals and make money with our men. We get and keep customers with our women. Most competitors are too stupid to do the same.”

    “The reason startups and early companies burn out, is that the management team devotes its energies to the simple and internal rather than the acquisition and retention of customers, talent, operational excellence, and knowledge.”

    “There are maximums that can be captured from to any market. When you approach that maximum, find a new investment that can make use of your customer base, advertising, marketing, sales network.”

    “Leveraging a brand is always easier to sell to investors, management, and staff, but always the worst idea for customers, market, and success. A product must stand on its own, and pursuit of ‘leverage’ is an excuse to produce a mediocre product that will fail. The only leverage that has any value is the promise to customers that the satisfaction of one purchase from the brand will be met with another of equal satisfaction.”

    “If I can’t convince the board to agree with me, then I’m either wrong, don’t understand the problem well enough, of have people on the board too stupid to understand. The job is to know which of those is the problem. It’s usually the first or second but not always.”

    “The CEO’s job is human capital. Customers, Employees, and Organization of people in pursuit of medium and long term objectives. Everyone else does work. If you’re doing anything else you’re not a good ceo.”

    “Government regulation has largely ruined accounting and financial reporting. And Accountants are justifiably lazy in recording transactions meaningfully, because that requires complexity. Demand (a) profit and loss from operations and operations alone in cash format. (c) profit and loss from administrative costs. (d) profit and loss from asset management, (e) profit and loss from ‘government interference in the business’: EBITDA (before interest, depreciation, and amortization), (f) net profit, and net after taxes. (g) and that both income statement and balance sheet reporting is provided as a rolling eighteen month to thirty-six month view. This is what the people in the business need to understand. Finance is not its own customer. (h) MBA’s are often better CFO’s that are CPA’s for this reason: bias to managing the organization rather than transaction costs of information management in accounting. The more companies you manage the more board members you have, the more useful this information is in suppressing silly questions and bad decisions and worse advice.”

    “The maximum transparency that does not expose you to competitive pressure if leaked is always preferable to letting people fly in the dark.”

    “The answer to any problem in your company or a customer’s company is known somewhere by someone – always. They lack the ability or will to circumvent the obstacles to advancing it. Treat every single soul as a source of information and improvement.”

    “The secret to staff meetings is to ask questions to test whether all opportunities are being seized, and risks mitigated or not. This is quality control by continuous education in urgency. That’s all. If you aren’t driving the business by yearly or semi-annual strategy and goal setting, but are managing in staff meetings you’re incompetent.”

    “Manage a company as if it is a grad school class, and teach as many people in that class as possible. Distribute organizational goals to all who are willing to participate in that class as homework. Grade them on it. People will value the career development and understanding of the business because they are informed participants constantly implementing adaptive change, not uninformed victims resisting it. If you aren’t good enough to do it, hire someone who is.”

    “There is a difference between cunning, smart, and moral. And they refer to the stages of a company: startup, immature, and mature. You must be cunning at first, build a management team that is smart, and an organization that is moral. This is why moral people run large companies and immoral people small ones.”

    “HR is by and large (a) admission that your staff is weak at mentoring and managing, and (b) an agent of the enemy we call the state, (c) constantly advancing the socialist-communist agenda. Have recruiters, an in house lawyer, and put benefits in accounting.”

    “Almost all middle management is absolutely dead weight and the source of political infighting. Divide tasks and responsibilities to useful people instead.”

    “Weak people universally overestimate their abilities, and strong people underestimate their abilities. Weak people commit to seize opportunities. Strong people commit to maintain opportunities.”

    “Power laws apply: 20% do 80% of everything. Of that 20%, 80% do everything useful. Of that 20%, 20% do everything important. Of that 20%, 20% do everything critical. The upper 1% and 10% and 20% of your organization make all the difference. This is true in all aspects of human existence bar none. If people understand this you will have a healthier organization. Truth is always better than fiction.”

    “People are, in the west, intentionally not educated in economics, finance, and accounting, nor radical differences in employee productivity (pareto rule) nor do they understand how narrow are profit margins and high taxation. They need to be taught. All of them.” (I ran a monthly class to educate all new employees on how money flows through an organization and how long it took for an employee to contribute to profit and how little each of us does. This was a revelation to almost everyone.)

    “The admin girls will always know everything – they are the optimum intelligence organization. They gossip constantly with every one because they are perceived as low risk. Treat that network as an asset for both collection and distribution of information – that is true.”

    “Women are, by and large, far, far, better at details, gathering information, maintaining productivity (marathons) understanding others quickly, coercing more gently, and adapting to fit into groups more quickly, and can sell commodities by relationship value alone – which is the only criteria of decidability in commodities. Men are more loyal, will make greater sacrifices, devote more time, more single mindedly (sprinters) are less susceptible to social coercion, are preferred managers for this reason, and will produce more outliers than women. Women are reliable even in the absence of pressures, and will organize themselves slowly. Men are dependable under stress and will organize themselves quickly -and there is a difference. Both will eventually come to similar conclusions. If there are differences in role and compensation it is not due to the direct factors but the indirect factors: men absorb cellular damage on behalf of women and children, and they absorb hardships on behalf of the management team. Don’t pretend people are all the same. They aren’t. Not even a little bit. If they are, then you’re selling a commodity by price alone.”

    “Gossip and conspiracy in another person’s self interest is a good thing. The opposite is not. Develop an institutional means of advancing compliments and suppressing gossip. This was one of our most important initiatives.”

    “Technology is eventually a butt-crack trade, rather than a profession, and will evolve mirror the class hierarchy of the construction industry. Make money at it while you can.”

    “In any decision between doing it better and anything else, do it better until no better will matter.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 11:19:00 UTC

  • “Tolerance is just a societal virtue signal that we are rich enough to afford a

    —“Tolerance is just a societal virtue signal that we are rich enough to afford a multicultural and diverse array of waste and still survive.”—@[11804727:2048:Steve Pender]


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 19:44:00 UTC

  • “CURT: WHAT IS ‘GENETIC LOAD’ IN CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY?”— —“Can I get

    —“CURT: WHAT IS ‘GENETIC LOAD’ IN CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY?”—

    —“Can I get a quick rundown on genetic load?”—Stephen Murray

    In the context of POLITICAL ECONOMY (What I do) IT’S AN ARGUMENT FOR A ONE CHILD POLICY.

    1) Long version: “… ratio of the employable (productive) to the unemployable (un productive).. sufficient to produce a pareto distribution (power law) at a given level of development (institutions, technology, economy) in competition with (context of) a given world economy (exterior condition). …”

    2) Short version: since you must produce a pareto distribution in order to organize an economy the ratio of the 120+ class to the rest of the population must be sufficient to do so.

    3) Or, shortest version: a small group of people with a median distribution of 100-112 cannot organize a productive competitive polity out of a large population with a median of 75-85.

    4) Or colloquial (“Over Beers”) version:

    – You cannot make a china out of an india.

    – You cannot make a europe out of the middle east.

    – You cannot make a europe out of a south america.

    … without decreasing the genetic load ( by the most civilized means: one child policy.)

    HOWEVER….

    You can however devolve a north america, a europe, a russia into a south america, india, middle east, by increasing genetic load through immigration or asymmetric reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 10:23:00 UTC