Theme: Productivity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542562192 Timestamp) —“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542562192 Timestamp) —“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543425047 Timestamp) MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM” (required reading)

    1. Trade has always existed (generating exchange)
    2. Markets have almost always existed (generating prices).

    3. Capitalists have existed as long as there have been markets (generating means of production).

    4. Northern Europeans (Venetians less so. Saxons largely, the Hansa in particular, the English systematically, the Dutch first at political scale), developed rule of law – which is why they escaped the church with the reformation.)

    5. Capitalism consists of rule of law consisting nearly entirely of markets, and socialism of rule of men eliminating or vastly reducing markets – but all polities have some mixed economy and must do so. The problem is that the state is superior at investing in some commons, but the private sector is far better at allocating and maximizing the returns on capital.

    6. So capitalism and socialism only evolved once the industrial revolution came into play – and the socialists demanded control over production. Capitalism then was the name they used for ‘market bias under rule of law’ , and socialism ‘state bias under rule of men’.

    So any statement about when was capitalism invented, is rater ‘stupid’ really. The answer is very simple: capitalism was the ‘jewish’ view of markets, and socialism the ‘jewish’ view of the state. And suckers bought into this false dichotomy. The question is and always will be the utilities of the state monopoly vs the private sector market. And as it stands, the lesson is quite clear: when it is simple and you know how to do it, but it’s risky and expensive, the state can provide startup capital and market protections. Once that investment is running, it can be ‘sold’ to the private sector who can then maximize its potential. The USA has mastered the art of moving this high risk investment into the private sector, but this has had the effect of hollowing out predictable sectors of the economy. So it appears that once again, there are those things it is better for the state to produce (labor-consuming and strategic companies, that are less speculative and produce slower longer returns), and things that it is better for the private sector to produce (IQ consuming and highly speculative things with shorter higher returns.) CONVERSELY The flood river and irrigation valleys of the fertile, crescent, pakistan-india, and china, could produce state-capital easily, just as the west could produce private-capital easily. The west and east homogenous peoples higher trust. The center tribal heterogenous people lower trust. It’s not complicated. You do what you can with the people and geography you have.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1544213520 Timestamp) https://www.wsj.com/articles/american-entrepreneurs-who-flocked-to-china-are-heading-home-disillusioned-1544197068

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545085047 Timestamp) I am pretty sure you are better off spending four years working on a project of your own, and publishing a few papers or a book about it than you are spending time in university. This is effectively what a PhD asks you to do, except your (scientific or technical) project, papers, and book have to survive market criticism rather than department criticism. It is easy to get a good job or career with that kind of evidence. Or put another way, university is an adequate clerical training program for those people who CANT produce their own project. Entrepreneurship is for people who don’t even need to do the project, papers and book. Entrepreneurship, Self Education, Good Education (STEM+L), Sh-t Education (Everything else), Going right to work (money and on the job training). Going right to work in the military( Training, Adventure, then money).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545085047 Timestamp) I am pretty sure you are better off spending four years working on a project of your own, and publishing a few papers or a book about it than you are spending time in university. This is effectively what a PhD asks you to do, except your (scientific or technical) project, papers, and book have to survive market criticism rather than department criticism. It is easy to get a good job or career with that kind of evidence. Or put another way, university is an adequate clerical training program for those people who CANT produce their own project. Entrepreneurship is for people who don’t even need to do the project, papers and book. Entrepreneurship, Self Education, Good Education (STEM+L), Sh-t Education (Everything else), Going right to work (money and on the job training). Going right to work in the military( Training, Adventure, then money).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546309655 Timestamp) PLEASE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS —“It was a good year for wealth creation. It was a tough year in financial markets, but for people who are creating wealth through companies, the economy itself is very strong.”— Michael Zeuner, managing partner of WE Family Offices.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546309655 Timestamp) PLEASE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS —“It was a good year for wealth creation. It was a tough year in financial markets, but for people who are creating wealth through companies, the economy itself is very strong.”— Michael Zeuner, managing partner of WE Family Offices.

  • (FB 1547435286 Timestamp) Gross adjusted household disposable income per capita

    (FB 1547435286 Timestamp) Gross adjusted household disposable income per capita of OECD countries in 2017 (in U.S. dollars) WHY BRITS SEEM POOR (THEY ARE)

  • (FB 1547435286 Timestamp) Gross adjusted household disposable income per capita

    (FB 1547435286 Timestamp) Gross adjusted household disposable income per capita of OECD countries in 2017 (in U.S. dollars) WHY BRITS SEEM POOR (THEY ARE)