Theme: Productivity

SEX DIFFERENCES DISCUSSIONS ARE SILLY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS
This is silly. We keep trying to frame sex differences in the context of economic productivity and political influence, instead of why the sexes evolved as the do. Women need to mature enough to reproduce quickly and to extend their nervous systems by hyper empathizing to account for the challenge of mentally observing, caring for, and regulating the minds, behavior, and development of thier offspring and to do so by the spectrum of ‘seductive’ care taking and emotional regulation.
The males (who are unfortunately, more disposable, and replacable) have to instead, mentally track the condition of territory, resources, and assets that must be systematically understood because it’s partly beyond their perception. This is the opposite need of the female.
So, women mature earleir and LESS than men, who mature later and more. But what does later and MORE mean? It means instead of empathizing with what’s in front of you IN-TIME, men systematize what’s NOT in front of the OVER-TIME. So the sex differences effectively result in a division of labor in time given sex roles. This plays out as women favor attention and consumption and externalization of resonsibility (for status) and men favor accumulation of capital and responsibility for it (for status) and status is just the measure of the discount on opportunities for cooperation, and cooperation is a discount on time, whether in-time(short term) or over-time(long term).
Now, what I suppose my work has taught me, is that all human developmental behavior occurs because of minor – very minor – bias in biochemistry, neurological composition, and most importantly neurological organization (what connects to what and how much).
So, it’s perhaps easier for me to understand and explain sex differences in development and maturity because I understand the (very simple) set of rules that cause sex differences and variation between us in addition to those sex differences.
At present we’re writing this section of the book, but somehow I feel it’s not as good as my courseware becasue there in slides I can use graphics, illustrations, diagrams, and videos.
But really, In my foundations and methods work, I try to list ‘dimensions’ which are the ‘levers’ that cause variation between us. And the variation between the sexes is just a few of those ‘levers or knobs’ and our vast diferences in behavior, especially at the extremes, are the product of just variation in those dimensions.
It’s disturbingly simple.
BUT it’s only disturbingly simple if you seek to know what is and why FIRST instead of justify what you want or wish it was.
Cheers

Reply addressees: @FeminaStudiosa @AutistocratMS

BRUTAL TRUTH ON THE ORIGIN OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR

No. Men want women to stop destroying capital from within using your pretense of care which is just suppressing neuroticism by advertising that you’re not a threat, evading threats by evading responsibility for regulating the behavior of others, and evading responsibility for your and your children’s feeding, clothing, housing, safe and high trust commons, medical, retirement, and regulating your impulsivity that you can barely regulate at all, and together with your neuroticism, that you sedate with attention seeking and hyperconsumption, and hypergamy, regardless of cost to the polity.

You see the big lie of equality is over. We know the physical biological and cognitive construction of the female and feminine mind and that above is the CAUSAL or origin of all feminine behavior. Why? The male mind is predatory because we are predators. The female mind is prey, because women and children are in fact prey. That the brain is organized as predator and prey, and that the sexes evolved to bias in favor of predator and prey, is just the division of labor between the empathic now and the systemic then.

The difference is that predators have more agency, particularly in self regulation of instinct and impulse, and prey has less especially in self regulation of instinct and impulse.

In other words “feminine feels and masculine reals.”

Do you think I like this? My job is necessary. But I don’t necessarily like it.

So, no. I preferred when we had our roles and didn’t lie about equality, and we treated everyone by sex, class, ethnicity, and race in the recognition that we must seek to work together to overcome our differences when possible and avoid conflict when not.

Instead the feminine left seeks to lie that we are in fact equal rather than that we should treat each other equally within the limits of the abilities of our sexes, classes, ethnicities and races.

And the result of the feminine desire to lie to evade the responsibility for mediating conflict while maximizing responsibility for self, private, and common GENERATES THE CONFLICT THE FEMININE SEEKS TO EVADE.

Women are not just arbitrarily irrational, but their irrational behavior originates in an irrational instinctual conflict between their means of seduction, manipulation, competition and warfare and their prey response’s and it’s neuroticism’s desire to evade the costs of that conflict at all costs.

If you study my work, at least after we publish (hopefully the end of this year), you will grasp that human behavior is disturbingly simple. And Darwin’s defeat of the supernatural will seem tepid inconsequence by contrast.

Because it will be very difficult to lie about anything from that point on.

Cheers.