THE THREE GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES
Feminine: Aggressive Gossip: (jewish)
Libertarian: Aggressive Trade (anglo neo-puritan)
Masculine: Aggressive Violence (muslim)
Russian = ++Gossip +Violence -Trade
Chinese = +Gossip +Violence -Trade
I suppose that we can graph all cultures on these three dimensions.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-17 05:24:00 UTC
SO IF WE CANNOT PARASITE UPON OTHERS AND CONTROL THEIR REPRODUCTION (SLAVERY) WHY CAN OTHERS PARASITE ON US AND LIMIT OUR REPRODUCTION (REDISTRIBUTION)? If we cannot colonise others, then why can others colonise us?
Forcible Redistribution Is Slavery. Forced immigration is colonisation. Statism is Slavery.
Nationalism.
Meritocracy immigration.
If you are from a shitty family that is no reason to redistribute to you unless you produce a non-shitty family
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-11 07:08:00 UTC
THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF MAN.
(important) (inflammatory)
Each wave of man was more aggressive than the previous.
Each wave of man exterminated the previous wave of man, whenever advantageous.
Hunter-Gatherers had bigger brains but were less numerous and less aggressive.
Northern Europeans with big brains are smarter with bigger brains and less aggressive.
The Steppe/Desert/Levant has been kicking off waves of increasingly aggressive peoples for thousands of years.
The newer peoples are less intelligent, more reproductive, and more aggressive.
They are the future of man.
Unless we change again, to keep them at bay.
The future isn’t one of achieving supra-human intelligence.
It’s one of decreasing intelligence and increasing aggression.
And the world is running out of the old species with calmer, smarter, bigger brains.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:06:00 UTC
MUST REALLY SUCK FOR AMERINDIANS TO KNOW THEY WIPED OUT THEIR PREDECESSORS.
(Kinda gets white people off the hook.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-09 16:05:00 UTC
–“I’m a libertarian: an advocate for aristocratic liberty: the elimination of demand for authority by the total prohibition on parasitism and free riding. Anarchy and liberty and nomocracy are synonyms. But Rothbardian libertinism is not logically or empirically a means for eliminating the state. It’s a means of increasing demand for it.”–
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-01 11:59:00 UTC
LENDING AND REPOSESSING YOUR WEALTH OF VIOLENCE
I love violence. I am a super-predatory. I have a wealth of violence. I am a man. I was born with my wealth of violence. I lend that violence to the state to use on my behalf collective gain. However, should the state no longer work in my interests, or should any man break my contract for cooperation, I reserve my right to withdraw my deposit of violence and use it to both restore cooperation and to restore the state to the pursuit of my interests.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-16 12:52:00 UTC
[N]assim (re: violence) I’d like to add an economist’s point of view: that the use of the term ‘violence’ is obscurant. (In my lexicon that is equivalent to pseudoscientific). Humans engage in a vast spectrum of parasitism whenever possible, and in production only when easy or necessary. Parasitism can be performed by violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by obscurantism, imposed cost by indirection, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy to extort, by normative conversion, by immigration, asymmetric reproduction, conquest, and genocide. Conversely, mutually beneficial, productive, warrantied, fully informed, cooperation by voluntary exchange is, by contrast, a very narrow field of human activity in a vast spectrum of parasitism. Over the centuries we have increasingly abstracted assets (that which we seek to consume by parasitism), from the physical to, fragments of a value chain, to mere numerical promises (accounts), so that violence is almost useless as a means of obtaining wealth. However, the volume of predation and parasitism performed by violence, is currently performed by various forms of pseudo-scientific and pseudo-moral fraud instead of violence. But the parasitism remains. Humans are open to coercion by only three technologies: Gossip(religion and morality), remuneration(trade, credit, tax and redistribution), or threat of violence(law,military). Although at any times some people specialize in some axis of coercion (public intellectuals:gossip, government:violence, corporations:purchasing influence.) So if we have exchanged parasitism via violence, for parasitism via pseudoscientific fraud (which is one aspect of what I believe you are investigating), then the form of parasitism has changed, but not the parasitism itself. We might argue that some form of parasitic equilibrium is actually some sort of Pareto optimum. But that is very different from saying that parasitism no longer exists, or has decreased. So as far as I am able to tell, net change in parasitism is zero, or perhaps as some people argue, we have seen a dramatic increase. It is just that we have created sufficient technology that our parasitism by pseudoscience does not injure production as much as parasitism by violence does. Furthermore, all the great syntopical historians have, as far as I know, come to the same conclusion: that since 1945, the Pax Americana is only paralleled by the Pax Romana. I argue rather frequently (as do many historians) that all economic measures since 1600 are little more than the reflection of the distribution of consumer capitalism, accounting, and rule of law around the world at the point of British gunships. So to address violence instead of parasitism, is to blind one’s self to the rest of the spectrum of human criminality in order to congratulate one’s self on having invented a more effective form of crime. Affections. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. Source: Curt Doolittle – Nassim Nicholas Taleb (re: violence) I’d like…
[N]assim (re: violence) I’d like to add an economist’s point of view: that the use of the term ‘violence’ is obscurant. (In my lexicon that is equivalent to pseudoscientific). Humans engage in a vast spectrum of parasitism whenever possible, and in production only when easy or necessary. Parasitism can be performed by violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by obscurantism, imposed cost by indirection, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy to extort, by normative conversion, by immigration, asymmetric reproduction, conquest, and genocide. Conversely, mutually beneficial, productive, warrantied, fully informed, cooperation by voluntary exchange is, by contrast, a very narrow field of human activity in a vast spectrum of parasitism. Over the centuries we have increasingly abstracted assets (that which we seek to consume by parasitism), from the physical to, fragments of a value chain, to mere numerical promises (accounts), so that violence is almost useless as a means of obtaining wealth. However, the volume of predation and parasitism performed by violence, is currently performed by various forms of pseudo-scientific and pseudo-moral fraud instead of violence. But the parasitism remains. Humans are open to coercion by only three technologies: Gossip(religion and morality), remuneration(trade, credit, tax and redistribution), or threat of violence(law,military). Although at any times some people specialize in some axis of coercion (public intellectuals:gossip, government:violence, corporations:purchasing influence.) So if we have exchanged parasitism via violence, for parasitism via pseudoscientific fraud (which is one aspect of what I believe you are investigating), then the form of parasitism has changed, but not the parasitism itself. We might argue that some form of parasitic equilibrium is actually some sort of Pareto optimum. But that is very different from saying that parasitism no longer exists, or has decreased. So as far as I am able to tell, net change in parasitism is zero, or perhaps as some people argue, we have seen a dramatic increase. It is just that we have created sufficient technology that our parasitism by pseudoscience does not injure production as much as parasitism by violence does. Furthermore, all the great syntopical historians have, as far as I know, come to the same conclusion: that since 1945, the Pax Americana is only paralleled by the Pax Romana. I argue rather frequently (as do many historians) that all economic measures since 1600 are little more than the reflection of the distribution of consumer capitalism, accounting, and rule of law around the world at the point of British gunships. So to address violence instead of parasitism, is to blind one’s self to the rest of the spectrum of human criminality in order to congratulate one’s self on having invented a more effective form of crime. Affections. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. Source: Curt Doolittle – Nassim Nicholas Taleb (re: violence) I’d like…
THE GENETIC BIAS OF NORT SEA EUROPEANS: PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM
Pathological Altruism as a means of suppressing free riding.
I am pretty sure that I’ve nailed the theory of western exceptionalism. It’s probably partly genetic. But that’s not material. What’s material is that it can be codified in law, regardless of genetics.
Truth is a means of suppressing free riding.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-15 02:41:00 UTC
[E]volution:
1) Higher Income reduces opportunity costs and risk (liberalism). Lower income increases opportunity cost and risk(conservatism).
2) Economic velocity is produced by the centralization of rents, which lowers local (productive) transaction costs at the expense of high total cost (taxation).
3) Once rents are centralized, we seek to obtain or privatize (redistribute) those rents (economic liberalism) through enfranchisement.
4) In a perfect world we seek to eliminate those rents (anglo classical liberalism).
5) But the diversity of ability leads to class warfare since meritocracy is valuable only to a minority, and rents, and parasitismare beneficial to the majority..
6) In a perfect world we pay the less able, parasitic, and rent seeking minority directly for the maintenance of the meritocratic commons, and thereby circumvent the parasitism of the bureaucratic, and political classes. And perhaps more importantly, prevent the misallocation of capital.
7) To accomplish this perfect world requires we develop institutions that allow us to produce commons, and pay people for producing those commons: meritocracy included.
GRAPH
X-Axis: Equalitarian/Socialist-Compromise/Social Democracy – Meritocratic/Classical Liberal Monarchy.
Y-Axis: Totalitarian- Democratic – Anarchic
Z-Axis: Wealth (elimination of transaction costs by the suppression of free riding)
Suppression of parasitism comes first. Centralize it to eliminate it locally. Then outlaw it, and eliminate it from the central bureaucracy. Economic velocity is determined by the suppression of free riding in all its forms at all levels in the polity.
(Read Emmanuel Todd’s Invention of Europe. Ricardo Duchsene’s Uniqueness of the West, Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty, Hoppe’s Democracy the God that Failed, and follow my humble efforts.)
Cheers