Theme: Predation

  • There is nothing contradictory in that statement. Democracy is selective in grou

    There is nothing contradictory in that statement. Democracy is selective in group and parasitic outgroup.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 16:15:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628600042304217088

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628589537980092416


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628589537980092416

  • The Incremental Suppression of Predation: Property-en-toto, The Common law, Rule

    The Incremental Suppression of Predation: Property-en-toto, The Common law, Rule of Law, Universal Standing in matters of the commons. #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:33:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627789384625033216

  • The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization

    The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization, Free-Riding, Conspiracy, Displacement, and Conquest. #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:31:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627788886601801728

  • The Deceitful Use of “We”

    (verbalism)(deception)(theft)(predation) [T]he misuse of the word “we” imposes costs upon others, since it is a form of deception that is to distract us from actions of predation and theft. Most frequently, the deceptive use of the word “we” is employed in the political sphere, in the west, is to further violate property en toto under the pretense of equality of interest. It’s a verbal parlor trick for the purpose of theft. It’s chicanery. –William Benge

  • The Deceitful Use of “We”

    (verbalism)(deception)(theft)(predation) [T]he misuse of the word “we” imposes costs upon others, since it is a form of deception that is to distract us from actions of predation and theft. Most frequently, the deceptive use of the word “we” is employed in the political sphere, in the west, is to further violate property en toto under the pretense of equality of interest. It’s a verbal parlor trick for the purpose of theft. It’s chicanery. –William Benge

  • The Battle Conservatives and Libertarians Face In Our Generation: Non-Parasitic

    The Battle Conservatives and Libertarians Face In Our Generation: Non-Parasitic Commons (Important) http://www.propertarianism.com/U1UvR #tcot #tlot #nrx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-31 07:03:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627011756578238464

  • Liberty Must Be Imposed by Force

    LIBERTY (FREEDOM FROM PARASITISM) MUST BE IMPOSED BY FORCE, BUT LIBERTY NEED NOT BE UNIVERSALLY REQUIRED: A MONOPOLY IS NOT NECESSARY. [L]iberty is the desire of those who are able.  Security the desire of those who are not. And parasitism is the desire of those who are evil. While strict construction of agreements, and the decidability of conflicts are impossible without a monopoly of individual property rights to property-en-toto, there is no reason for a monopoly means of producing commons using those rights.

    There is no reason some individuals cannot form collectives and ostracize libertarians and no reason libertarians cannot form collective and ostracize communalists. There is no reason some cannot participate in socialist groups and others libertarian groups – as long as rule of law under property-en-toto, and the total prohibition on parasitism exists as a means of providing for strict construction of agreements, and decidability in conflicts. We know what bad is: parasitism. But good is dependent upon your abilities. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
  • Liberty Must Be Imposed by Force

    LIBERTY (FREEDOM FROM PARASITISM) MUST BE IMPOSED BY FORCE, BUT LIBERTY NEED NOT BE UNIVERSALLY REQUIRED: A MONOPOLY IS NOT NECESSARY. [L]iberty is the desire of those who are able.  Security the desire of those who are not. And parasitism is the desire of those who are evil. While strict construction of agreements, and the decidability of conflicts are impossible without a monopoly of individual property rights to property-en-toto, there is no reason for a monopoly means of producing commons using those rights.

    There is no reason some individuals cannot form collectives and ostracize libertarians and no reason libertarians cannot form collective and ostracize communalists. There is no reason some cannot participate in socialist groups and others libertarian groups – as long as rule of law under property-en-toto, and the total prohibition on parasitism exists as a means of providing for strict construction of agreements, and decidability in conflicts. We know what bad is: parasitism. But good is dependent upon your abilities. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
  • COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY Agreeing not to prey upon

    COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY

    Agreeing not to prey upon you is different from subsidising you. To cooperate requires I do not prey upon you. Using the State for purposes of transferring from me against my will to you is just predation. So if you will use the state for predation upon my family then in turn I am free to prey upon you and yours. So the only choice to preserve cooperation is to preserve mutual non-predation.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-30 05:31:00 UTC

  • LIBERTY (FREEDOM FROM PARASITISM) MUST BE IMPOSED BY FORCE, BUT LIBERTY NEED NOT

    LIBERTY (FREEDOM FROM PARASITISM) MUST BE IMPOSED BY FORCE, BUT LIBERTY NEED NOT BE UNIVERSALLY REQUIRED: A MONOPOLY IS NOT NECESSARY.

    Liberty is the desire of those who are able, security the desire of those who are not, and parasitism is the desire of those who are evil.

    While strict construction of agreements, and the decidability of conflicts is impossible without a monopoly of individual property rights to property-en-toto, there is no reason for a monopoly means of producing commons using those rights.

    There is no reason some individuals cannot form collectives and ostracize libertarians and no reason libertarians cannot form collective and ostracize communalists.

    There is no reason some cannot participate in socialist groups and others libertarian groups – as long as rule of law under property-en-toto, and the total prohibition on parasitism exists as a means of providing for strict construction of agreements, and decidability in conflicts.

    We know what bad is: parasitism. But good is dependent upon your abilities.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-28 03:52:00 UTC