Curt Doolittle

Theme: Predation

  • Rothbardians are to the Commons as Socialists are to Production

    [I]’ll simplify it: we cannot all be parasites. ergo: NAP/Rothbardian libertinism is to commons as socialism is to production.Socialists lay claim to the fruits of other’s production under the false premise that they will continue to produce. Libertines (rothbardians) lay claim to the fruits of others production of commons under the false premise that they will continue to produce commons. But humans don’t tolerate free riders on production or commons. It’s a form of aggression against their property-en-toto: that which they have expended effort to inventory as potential for future production or consumption.*** A condition of Liberty is constructed by the common production of the suppression of parasitism in private, social, political, and out-group human action. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the informational commons such that it is no longer possible to engage in parasitism through deceptive (or erroneous) language. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the government by the demand for strict construction under the one law voluntary transfer, so that it is no longer possible to steal via the government. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the bureaucracy by universal standing in court, and the restoration of rule of law so that all citizens are subject the same prosecution for involuntary transfer. And much more. Rothbardianism is just parasitism. If you want a world without commons try to make one. It isn’t rational that one can exist, and it isn’t empirically demonstrable that one can exist.

  • Rothbardians are to the Commons as Socialists are to Production

    [I]’ll simplify it: we cannot all be parasites. ergo: NAP/Rothbardian libertinism is to commons as socialism is to production.Socialists lay claim to the fruits of other’s production under the false premise that they will continue to produce. Libertines (rothbardians) lay claim to the fruits of others production of commons under the false premise that they will continue to produce commons. But humans don’t tolerate free riders on production or commons. It’s a form of aggression against their property-en-toto: that which they have expended effort to inventory as potential for future production or consumption.*** A condition of Liberty is constructed by the common production of the suppression of parasitism in private, social, political, and out-group human action. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the informational commons such that it is no longer possible to engage in parasitism through deceptive (or erroneous) language. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the government by the demand for strict construction under the one law voluntary transfer, so that it is no longer possible to steal via the government. Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the bureaucracy by universal standing in court, and the restoration of rule of law so that all citizens are subject the same prosecution for involuntary transfer. And much more. Rothbardianism is just parasitism. If you want a world without commons try to make one. It isn’t rational that one can exist, and it isn’t empirically demonstrable that one can exist.

  • Is Islam Objectively Evil? Why?

    [I]t is not that one fails to comprehend it (accept its fallacies). It is that it is objectively evil in every dimension: One does not judge a product by its advertising but by it's performance. One does not judge a religion by its narrative or claims, but by the status of its adherents. One does not judge a statement by its meaning or justification but by its truth or falsehood. One does not justify antique (primitive) language and reasoning ,in modern (advanced) context. So advocates make at least these four errors – all of which are both false and mere excuses to do what is familiar rather than to do what is true. Islam is the most regressive philosophy on earth – it is even worse than communism. All others are superior. They are superior because the epistemology, social order, and objective of the competitors are superior. The only measure of a philosophy is the economic status of its adherents. The only measure of a business plan is its success in the market. The only measure of a political system is its non-parasitic production of commons. The only measure of your argument is an excuse to persist what amounts to one of the great lies of history that weaponizes ignorance. Islam spreads ignorance in the mind and consequential poverty. Just as communism spread pseudoscience and poverty. Every word you speak it its advocacy defense, or practice is destructive to mankind. This a merely an empirical statement. I can, conversely, construct an internal consistent argument of why islam manufactures ignorance, but this is beyond this conversation. And with both internal consistency and external correspondence, and moral objectivity, we have constructed a scientific argument that objectively demonstrates that islam is everything a devil would wish it to be: the cancer of mankind.

  • Is Islam Objectively Evil? Why?

    [I]t is not that one fails to comprehend it (accept its fallacies). It is that it is objectively evil in every dimension: One does not judge a product by its advertising but by it's performance. One does not judge a religion by its narrative or claims, but by the status of its adherents. One does not judge a statement by its meaning or justification but by its truth or falsehood. One does not justify antique (primitive) language and reasoning ,in modern (advanced) context. So advocates make at least these four errors – all of which are both false and mere excuses to do what is familiar rather than to do what is true. Islam is the most regressive philosophy on earth – it is even worse than communism. All others are superior. They are superior because the epistemology, social order, and objective of the competitors are superior. The only measure of a philosophy is the economic status of its adherents. The only measure of a business plan is its success in the market. The only measure of a political system is its non-parasitic production of commons. The only measure of your argument is an excuse to persist what amounts to one of the great lies of history that weaponizes ignorance. Islam spreads ignorance in the mind and consequential poverty. Just as communism spread pseudoscience and poverty. Every word you speak it its advocacy defense, or practice is destructive to mankind. This a merely an empirical statement. I can, conversely, construct an internal consistent argument of why islam manufactures ignorance, but this is beyond this conversation. And with both internal consistency and external correspondence, and moral objectivity, we have constructed a scientific argument that objectively demonstrates that islam is everything a devil would wish it to be: the cancer of mankind.

  • ISLAM IS OBJECTIVELY EVIL. WHY? It is not that one fails to comprehend it (accep

    ISLAM IS OBJECTIVELY EVIL. WHY?

    It is not that one fails to comprehend it (accept its fallacies). It is that it is objectively evil in every dimension:

    One does not judge a product by its advertising but by it’s performance.

    One does not judge a religion by its narrative or claims, but by the status of its adherents.

    One does not judge a statement by its meaning or justification but by its truth or falsehood.

    One does not justify antique (primitive) language and reasoning ,in modern (advanced) context.

    So advocates make at least these four errors – all of which are both false and mere excuses to do what is familiar rather than to do what is true.

    Islam is the most regressive philosophy on earth – it is even worse than communism. All others are superior.

    They are superior because the epistemology, social order, and objective of the competitors are superior.

    The only measure of a philosophy is the economic status of its adherents.

    The only measure of a business plan is its success in the market.

    The only measure of a political system is its non-parasitic

    production of commons.

    The only measure of your argument is an excuse to persist what amounts to one of the great lies of history that weaponizes ignorance.

    Islam spreads ignorance in the mind and consequential poverty. Just as communism spread pseudoscience and poverty.

    Every word you speak it its advocacy defense, or practice is destructive to mankind.

    This a merely an empirical statement. I can, conversely, construct an internal consistent argument of why islam manufactures ignorance, but this is beyond this conversation. And with both internal consistency and external correspondence, and moral objectivity, we have

    constructed a scientific argument that objectively demonstrates that islam is everything a devil would wish it to be: the cancer of mankind.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 04:43:00 UTC

  • ROTHBARDIANS ARE TO THE COMMONS AS SOCIALISTS ARE TO PRODUCTION ***I’ll simplify

    ROTHBARDIANS ARE TO THE COMMONS AS SOCIALISTS ARE TO PRODUCTION

    ***I’ll simplify it: we cannot all be parasites. ergo: NAP/Rothbardian libertinism is to commons as socialism is to production.Socialists lay claim to the fruits of other’s production under the false premise that they will continue to produce. Libertines (rothbardians) lay claim to the fruits of others production of commons under the false premise that they will continue to produce commons. But humans don’t tolerate free riders on production or commons. It’s a form of aggression against their property-en-toto: that which they have expended effort to inventory as potential for future production or consumption.***

    A condition of Liberty is constructed by the common production of the suppression of parasitism in private, social, political, and out-group human action.

    Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the informational commons such that it is no longer possible to engage in parasitism through deceptive (or erroneous) language.

    Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the government by the demand for strict construction under the one law voluntary transfer, so that it is no longer possible to steal via the government.

    Propertarianism seeks the incremental suppression of parasitism in the bureaucracy by universal standing in court, and the restoration of rule of law so that all citizens are subject the same prosecution for involuntary transfer.

    And much more.

    Rothbardianism is just parasitism.

    If you want a world without commons try to make one. It isn’t rational that one can exist, and it isn’t empirically demonstrable that one can exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 01:39:00 UTC

  • Strategy: If We Eliminate The Parasitic, Only Liberty Remains

    (worth repeating) [R]emove all choice, so that only Liberty Remains, just as by removing all choice, only the market remains.

    “If we make it just as difficult to deceive, lie cheat, free ride and privatize as we have made it difficult to steal physical property, then liberty will result from it. Because all those things that prohibit liberty are matters of theft of one kind or another. So instead of advocating liberty as a way of producing liberty, I’m trying to outlaw everything else so that only liberty remains.”—Curt Doolittle

    We pacify man by the incremental suppression and if necessary, extermination, of parasitism.

  • Strategy: If We Eliminate The Parasitic, Only Liberty Remains

    (worth repeating) [R]emove all choice, so that only Liberty Remains, just as by removing all choice, only the market remains.

    “If we make it just as difficult to deceive, lie cheat, free ride and privatize as we have made it difficult to steal physical property, then liberty will result from it. Because all those things that prohibit liberty are matters of theft of one kind or another. So instead of advocating liberty as a way of producing liberty, I’m trying to outlaw everything else so that only liberty remains.”—Curt Doolittle

    We pacify man by the incremental suppression and if necessary, extermination, of parasitism.

  • INTENTIONAL ABUSE OF ETHICAL SYSTEMS AS A MEANS OF PARASITISM (false use of ethi

    INTENTIONAL ABUSE OF ETHICAL SYSTEMS AS A MEANS OF PARASITISM

    (false use of ethics as a means of deception)

    In childhood we require others to imitate: virtue ethics.

    in adulthood we require general rules to apply : rule ethics.

    In wisdom we require outcomes to measure : outcome ethics.

    Not all can achieve outcome ethics. Some are stuck in virtue. Others in rule.

    1 ) We forgive children who obey virtue ethics because they cannot understand rules.

    2) We forgive adults who obey rule ethics because they cannot understand the outcomes.

    3) We rarely forgive outcome ethics, which we see as error (when a general fails) and should have relied upon conventual wisdom or morality.

    THE DARK SIDE

    There are those who practice virtue and rule ethics in order to circumvent responsibility for outcomes.

    Keynesianism and Rothbardianism are dark side ethics. They ignore the consequences in order to further current self interest.

    Lies, more lies, and many more lies.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 08:05:00 UTC

  • ARE THEY IN FACT RELIGIONS? OR ARE THEY MILITARY AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS (worth re

    ARE THEY IN FACT RELIGIONS? OR ARE THEY MILITARY AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS

    (worth repeating)

    ISLAM: Islam is a (destructive) military system of perpetual conquest masquerading as a religion. they have weaponized reproduction, raiding, parasitism, and ignorance (static truth), and every muslim nation is harmed by its presence.

    JUDAISM Judaism is a (parasitic) legal system masquerading as a religion and political system. It is neither. Every host nation is harmed by its presence.

    MARXISM. Marxism was a (parasitic) religion masquerading as a political system, constructed from obscurantism and pseudoscience. Every host nation was not only harmed but the subject of vast murder and genocide, and imposed vast costs on the rest of mankind.

    CHRISTIANITY Christianity is a (constructive) ethical and moral system which is what we comprehend in the west as the purpose of a religious system. In other words we have a cognitive bias in the west to classify religions by their signage rather than by their functions.

    BUDDHISM. Buddhism is a personal philosophy if not a mental training exercise required of all humans in post tribal life, masquerading as a religion. Stoicism is to buddhism what philosophy is to religion. It was a tragic loss. So buddhism is the sort of silly version that remains.

    HINDUISM Hinduism is a mythological religion that is so pervasive as to nearly totally disconnect humans from existential reality so that they can tolerate bad weather, overpopulation, and near starvation.

    The easiest way to solve the constitutional problem is to classify a religion as christians classify a religion, which means that only christianity, buddhism and hinduism survive as de facto religions.

    Any religion incompatible with Natural Law (the law of christianity and the west) is not a religion, but a political system, or a military system, both of which are means of conquest.

    RELIGION MAY PROVIDE WISDOM AND ALLEGORY BUT IT MAY NOT CLAIM TRUTH OR LAW.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 06:29:00 UTC