Curt Doolittle

Theme: Predation

  • Cunning improves one’s ability and incentive to steal. Morality improves one’s a

    Cunning improves one’s ability and incentive to steal. Morality improves one’s ability and incentive to refrain from stealing.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 17:34:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/694212134855647234

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/693864701483024384

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    That the average insane degenerate communist progressive is smarter than the average Twitter rightist is, sadly, simply a fact. …

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/693864701483024384

  • IF MY WORK IS OFFENSIVE TO YOU, THEN YOU ARE A THIEF. I mean. It’s that simple r

    IF MY WORK IS OFFENSIVE TO YOU, THEN YOU ARE A THIEF.

    I mean. It’s that simple right? Truth hurts sometimes.

    Being called out as a thief is definitely unpleasant. Propertarianism and Testimonialism make your thievery visible. You’ve been caught. I understand that you don’t like being caught. I understand that thieves blame everyone else other than themselves.

    If my work is offensive then you’re just a thief. Sorry. Just how it is.

    If you don’t understand it, then you just don’t understand it. Your understanding is no more a measure of my work than your understanding of any other logical specialization. Incomprehension is not a criticism. Nor is complexity a criticism. There are many counter-intuitive complexities in human experience.

    If you think it’s incomplete, or could be better, well then, I agree with you. Its incomplete and it could be better.

    If you think my ambitions are unwise, well, then I acknowledge that possibility.

    But in my experience finding the work offensive is an attempt to preserve deceit and theft.

    The Transcendence of man requires that we clean our intellectual house, incrementally increase suppression of parasitism, and create great monuments to our success.

    We have likely passed peak human. Smaller brains, lower intelligence, higher aggression, and higher reproduction, can destroy mankind’s promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 06:13:00 UTC

  • DEBT(RESTITUTION:JUSTICE) VS PARASITISM(INJUSTICE) (important post) PARASITISM (

    DEBT(RESTITUTION:JUSTICE) VS PARASITISM(INJUSTICE)

    (important post)

    PARASITISM (EXTRACTION: INJUSTICE : WAR)

    Political Parasitism : Forcible Redistribution to non-kin (war).

    Political Harm: Forcible Maintenance of Suicidal Commons (war).

    Political Debt : Child support, Alimony, Common Property (war).

    Usury Debt: Predatory Financing Debt (asymmetric knowledge, unproductive, warrantied (no skin in the game), involuntary, causing externalities) (war)

    —VS—

    DEBT (RESTITUTION: JUSTICE: COOPERATION)

    Debt: Forcible Transfer of Restitution for Non Predatory Debt (fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary, free of externality.)

    Restitution Debt: Forcible transfer of restitution.

    Punishment Debt: Imposition of costs for betrayal.

    The only ‘debt’ is restitution.

    Interest must be earned (productive).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 03:24:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIAN SPECTRUM LEFT Libertines: free riders on the normative commons. Whin

    LIBERTARIAN SPECTRUM

    LEFT

    Libertines: free riders on the normative commons. Whining about liberty because they don’t want to pay for it, or even respect the investments of others. They want evasion, not liberty. “NAP’ers That Don’t Care.”

    CENTER

    Bourgeois Libertarians: Free riders on the defensive commons. Whine about not having liberty because they don’t want to pay for it. They want permission, not liberty. “NAP’ers + Excuse Making”

    RIGHT

    Aristocratic Libertarians (conservative libertarians): Pay the cost of liberty and possess liberty, by suppressing parasitism. They want liberty and are willing to act to possess it. “NonAggression against demonstrated property: that which causes retaliation and inhibits cooperation”.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-21 04:48:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) 1) The argument I have put forward is genetic pacification. Mea

    (from elsewhere)

    1) The argument I have put forward is genetic pacification. Meaning that the purpose is not to change behavior but to forcibly remove people from the commons, the social order, and the gene pool, and continue the ongoing incremental suppression of aggression, and long term pacification of aggression in the world.

    2) As far as I know the death penalty has little impact on certain demographics, possibly because it is statistically improbable that one will suffer it. However, through about 1900 we hung about .5-1% of people a year and the argument is that this was responsible for the genetic advantage of northern europeans everywhere they went in the world – the people who were otherwise were culled.

    3) The evidence from the field, from sheriffs, from police, from prosecutors, is that the three strikes policy has been disproportionately effective. It has for example caused vast migrations between states of the organized petty crime conducted by the methamphetamine trade. And in the northwest its a common complaint that lower tolerance drives Idaho criminals into eastern Washington for example.

    4) Conformity in this case is Non Aggression against Property En Toto. It is somewhat hard to argue that non-aggression is something we avoid conforming to. (If you have some other logic at hand I would love to understand it.)

    One cannot create an intertemporal disincentive for the inter-temporally challenged and cognitively impaired. We can however, cull them if they engage in aggression, and if not we can pay them to behave.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-21 04:48:00 UTC

  • “Given that all wealth was produced by humans (everything around us was once raw

    —“Given that all wealth was produced by humans (everything around us was once raw matter in the ground), as long as parasitism is suppressed and the reproduction rate is lower than the consumption rate for each family, the production of more humans (those of likely high-productive ability) would yield more productivity than merely maximizing production from the current population.”— Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-17 12:32:00 UTC

  • know. Libertarians just try to justify free riding. They’re no different than li

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/its-up-to-rothbardians-to-demonstrate-that-they-are-not/I know. Libertarians just try to justify free riding. They’re no different than liberals except they don’t directly want to steal from you. they just want to do it indirectly. By free riding.

    Everyone fights, no one quits. If you do, then you’re a thief. It’s that simple.

    A FEW RELATED POSTS ON LIBERTARIANS AS PROGRESSIVE LIBERTINES

    WE ARE MORALLY BLIND

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/we-are-morally-blind-limited-in-our-perceptions-and-memory-and-severely-in-our-reason-the-last-thing-we-should-do-is-construct-large-risk-prone-intentionally-managed-states/

    LIBERTINE COGNITIVE BIAS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/libertarian-moral-spectrum-blindness/

    ITS UP TO ROTHBARDIANS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE NOT MORALLY BLIND

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/its-up-to-rothbardians-to-demonstrate-that-they-are-not/

    THE DECEPTION OF “PSYCHIC BENEFIT”

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/the-moral-deception-of-the-ethical-standard-of-psychic-benefit/

    REFORMING LIBERTARIAN ETHICS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/02/15/reforming-libertarian-ethics/

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 15:29:00 UTC

  • QUESTION AUTHORITY, QUESTION OBEDIENCE? Well, we can also question attempts to e

    QUESTION AUTHORITY, QUESTION OBEDIENCE?

    Well, we can also question attempts to engage in parasitism by evading payment for commons.

    The question is only whether we use and benefit from that commons or not.

    And if not can we not pay for them.

    But to use a commons and not pay for it … that is merely theft.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 03:41:00 UTC

  • Intentional Abuse of Ethical Systems as a Means of Parasitism

    [T]he false use of ethics as a means of deception. In childhood we require others to imitate: virtue ethics. In adulthood we require general rules to apply : rule ethics. In wisdom we require outcomes to measure : outcome ethics. Not all can achieve outcome ethics. Some are stuck in virtue. Others in rule. 1) We forgive children who obey virtue ethics because they cannot understand rules. 2) We forgive adults who obey rule ethics because they cannot understand the outcomes. 3) We rarely forgive outcome ethics, which we see as error (when a general fails) and should have relied upon conventual wisdom or morality. THE DARK SIDE There are those who practice virtue and rule ethics in order to circumvent responsibility for outcomes. Keynesianism and Rothbardianism are dark side ethics. They ignore the consequences in order to further current self interest. Lies, more lies, and many more lies. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • Intentional Abuse of Ethical Systems as a Means of Parasitism

    [T]he false use of ethics as a means of deception. In childhood we require others to imitate: virtue ethics. In adulthood we require general rules to apply : rule ethics. In wisdom we require outcomes to measure : outcome ethics. Not all can achieve outcome ethics. Some are stuck in virtue. Others in rule. 1) We forgive children who obey virtue ethics because they cannot understand rules. 2) We forgive adults who obey rule ethics because they cannot understand the outcomes. 3) We rarely forgive outcome ethics, which we see as error (when a general fails) and should have relied upon conventual wisdom or morality. THE DARK SIDE There are those who practice virtue and rule ethics in order to circumvent responsibility for outcomes. Keynesianism and Rothbardianism are dark side ethics. They ignore the consequences in order to further current self interest. Lies, more lies, and many more lies. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.