—“The rich can do what they want. We can cooperate, or, um… or do other things. But if they choose other things, it goes both ways. I’m not entitled to anything. But neither are they. I’m not entitled to a living. They’re not entitled to live… I hope the money they save on the nanny and gardner also pays for enough foreign mercenaries. They’re going to need them.”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 12:20:00 UTC
THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:42:00 UTC
“YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW”
You mean, islam destroyed north african, levantine, byzantine, and persian civilizations. Is trying to destroy Indian civilization. And is only successfully resisted by Chinese civilization? And is only going to succeed at destroying western civilization, because of the prior conquest of western civilization by the previous generation of islam: christianity?
So for 1400 years islam has destroyed four major advanced civilizations, and is in the process of destroying all but one: china.
With the only ‘break’ in the conquest of the advanced civilizations has been the past 200 years, where we have had advanced technology with which to defeat their numbers, and ability to maneuver.
And that we are reaping the sewing of our christian ethic?
😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:45:00 UTC
#Trump They fear your ending of their parasitism. But they do not see the millions of us with torches and pitchforks you defend them from.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 12:41:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872433353143848960
#Trump They fear your ending of their parasitism. But they do not see the millions of us with torches and pitchforks you defend them from.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 08:41:00 UTC
BUT AT PRESENT THE ABRAHAMISTS OF ALL STRIPES ARE DEMANDING OUR TERRITORY.
Kevin Macdonald’s not quite right. White people do not have some strange altruism.
Instead, 1) we are less diverse, less clannish, less aggressive and it’s in our genes at present; 2) the aristocracy’s markets and production profit from labor and trade, so it’s cultural 3) the christian ethic extends this hyper-forgiveness as a means of reducing conflict over trivialities (ignorance, incompetence, bad manners, lack of sophistication) by asking us to pay high costs of purchasing new ‘customers’ and ‘associates’, so it’s religious. All of these traits encourage the development of trust and trade, which is why westerners prospered.
Sun Tzu suggests the same tolerance in his book on war. A king should not begrudge an enemy a horse, or a princess even. But when he demands territory one must ride off to war and destroy him. Westerners developed high tolerance, even rarely using capital punishment until the middle ages.
THE ABRAHAMISTS OF ALL STRIPES ARE DEMANDING OUR TERRITORY.
IT IS TIME TO RIDE OFF TO WAR.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 09:52:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-know-about-National-Human-Rights-Commission/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=625ea18e&srid=u4QvIt is a meddlesome Marxist Institution advocating parasitism by the underclasses against the productive middle classes.
The only possible human rights are property rights to your life, your body, your thoughts, your actions, that which you have obtained in trade.
There exist no other possible rights, since the only rights universally possible are those that we are universally capable of delivering to one another. If we cannot universally deliver it cannot be a human right. Ergo, the only rights possible are non-interference and non imposition against the life, body, thoughts, actions, and possessions and interests obtained in trade.
So our ‘rights’ mirror our obligations. We cannot claim a right without declaring it our obligation, and we cannot claim a right or obligation that we cannot act upon. Therefore the only rights and obligations that are possible are to NOT DO SOMETHING.
The primary right and obligation that we have not imposed is the right to bear children only that we can afford, and the obligation to bear children only that we can afford, and to NOT bear children we cannot afford.
This is the one remaining human right that we must struggle produce. Because at present thi sis the cause of the violation of every other human right: creating a moral hazard by violating the rights of others, by producing offspring you cannot provide for, thereby requiring subsidy from those others who can.
The human obligation not to bear offspring we cannot afford is the cause of poverty.
But women will never tolerate this law, and this is the purpose of the Human RIghts Commission: to prevent the imposition of the only missing human right and obligation.
Do you understand?
That woman and that man, who create children that they cannot provide for are the people who must be punished if we are to obtain human rights for all.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 20:00:00 UTC
It is a meddlesome Marxist Institution advocating parasitism by the underclasses against the productive middle classes.
The only possible human rights are property rights to your life, your body, your thoughts, your actions, that which you have obtained in trade.
There exist no other possible rights, since the only rights universally possible are those that we are universally capable of delivering to one another. If we cannot universally deliver it cannot be a human right. Ergo, the only rights possible are non-interference and non imposition against the life, body, thoughts, actions, and possessions and interests obtained in trade.
So our ‘rights’ mirror our obligations. We cannot claim a right without declaring it our obligation, and we cannot claim a right or obligation that we cannot act upon. Therefore the only rights and obligations that are possible are to NOT DO SOMETHING.
The primary right and obligation that we have not imposed is the right to bear children only that we can afford, and the obligation to bear children only that we can afford, and to NOT bear children we cannot afford.
This is the one remaining human right that we must struggle produce. Because at present thi sis the cause of the violation of every other human right: creating a moral hazard by violating the rights of others, by producing offspring you cannot provide for, thereby requiring subsidy from those others who can.
The human obligation not to bear offspring we cannot afford is the cause of poverty.
But women will never tolerate this law, and this is the purpose of the Human RIghts Commission: to prevent the imposition of the only missing human right and obligation.
Do you understand?
That woman and that man, who create children that they cannot provide for are the people who must be punished if we are to obtain human rights for all.
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-know-about-National-Human-Rights-Commission
It is a meddlesome Marxist Institution advocating parasitism by the underclasses against the productive middle classes.
The only possible human rights are property rights to your life, your body, your thoughts, your actions, that which you have obtained in trade.
There exist no other possible rights, since the only rights universally possible are those that we are universally capable of delivering to one another. If we cannot universally deliver it cannot be a human right. Ergo, the only rights possible are non-interference and non imposition against the life, body, thoughts, actions, and possessions and interests obtained in trade.
So our ‘rights’ mirror our obligations. We cannot claim a right without declaring it our obligation, and we cannot claim a right or obligation that we cannot act upon. Therefore the only rights and obligations that are possible are to NOT DO SOMETHING.
The primary right and obligation that we have not imposed is the right to bear children only that we can afford, and the obligation to bear children only that we can afford, and to NOT bear children we cannot afford.
This is the one remaining human right that we must struggle produce. Because at present thi sis the cause of the violation of every other human right: creating a moral hazard by violating the rights of others, by producing offspring you cannot provide for, thereby requiring subsidy from those others who can.
The human obligation not to bear offspring we cannot afford is the cause of poverty.
But women will never tolerate this law, and this is the purpose of the Human RIghts Commission: to prevent the imposition of the only missing human right and obligation.
Do you understand?
That woman and that man, who create children that they cannot provide for are the people who must be punished if we are to obtain human rights for all.
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-know-about-National-Human-Rights-Commission
The only reason to engage in consent is that it is more rewarding to engage in such consent than it is to engage in predation or parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 17:27:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867431876314755083
Reply addressees: @EasternMarxist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867430416298455041
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867430416298455041