I am not interested in anti-jewish literature or arguments. I”m not interested in anti-anyone arguments. I’m interested in how we can defeat group evolutionary strategies – not how to GOSSIP about them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:13:00 UTC
I am not interested in anti-jewish literature or arguments. I”m not interested in anti-anyone arguments. I’m interested in how we can defeat group evolutionary strategies – not how to GOSSIP about them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:13:00 UTC
IT’S QUITE SIMPLE:
COMMON GOOD ENDS WHERE KIN GOOD ENDS. ALL ELSE IS EXCUSE FOR GENOCIDE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-20 15:33:00 UTC
(Yes, as you’ve noticed I’m going to take on the counter-signaling free riders that won’t fight a revolution so that they have no virtue signals to hide behind. A civilization is owned by those who fight for it. Those who can defend a thing, own a thing. Period.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-20 13:06:00 UTC
IF YOU COUNTER SIGNAL A REVOLUTION YOU’RE JUST AS BAD AS THE LEFT:
A FREE RIDER.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-20 12:38:00 UTC
GROUP: LOYALTY AND BETRAYAL
The central problem for any group, of any size, is to maximize all opportunities with positive externalities (loyalty) without tolerating the taking of opportunities with negative externalities (defection). Loyalty matters. There is always a limit to opportunism – in everything: trade, marriage, mating. And this is what corporatism licenses: defection (betrayal). Low trust peoples profit best when they can live among high trust peoples and exploit the difficulty of measuring betrayals through moral hazard internally, and defection and betrayal externally. Liberty, free trade, globalism. These are all terms for licensing betrayal. And maybe that is surprising. These three words propose moral falsehoods in order to betray the group. Rule of Law by Natural Law with Full Accounting leads to the same conditions as liberty, free trade, and globalism, but it forbids negative externalities against the group no matter how small. The question has never been what form of government do we need in order to construct a condition free of impositions upon us by others. That form of government is Nomocracy: Rule of Law under Natural Law. Every other form of government is just some other method of condoning one form of betrayal of the group or another.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 13:00:00 UTC
Akhenaten was trying to do the same thing I am, 3350 years ago. End the rent seeking parasites.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:48:00 UTC
(watching. i’m struck. these people. they look like prey.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 14:17:00 UTC
ON THE PRETENSE OF MORALITY AS COVER FOR PARASITISM
Social orders consist of a variety of institutions. I am going through the sum total of human thought AND human institutions, and attempting to discover the methods of eliminating deceit from the commons.
Now, it SOUNDS to me like Brian cannot grasp the difference between telling people SOMTHING TO DO and think, versus telling people what they CANNOT speak, display and act upon in the commons because it spreads falsehood.
Now, I already know why Brian is doing that kind of counter-signaling, and I expect all people to counter-signal when they are attached to a preferred falsehood, just as a corrupt politician, a corrupt public intellectual, a corrupt academic, a corrupt businessman, or any other corrupt person justifies his parasitism upon other people through use of deception.
So the fact that people want to preserve their falsehoods, whether to preserve a false self image, or to preserve the ability to obtain false signals by virtue signaling others, or to preserve allies, or to preserve intellectual malinvestments, or to preserve allies political and cultural, or to preserve rents, is somewhat immaterial
If you are engaging in falsehood as a means of obtaining something via the commons then it is just another form of fraud.
If you think that you can construct a set of virtues (values, positives) that are non-parasitic and advance some reproductive strategy that is good. If you can construct a set of virtues (values, positives) that advance a different reproductive strategy (signal strategy), that is also non-parasitic, that’s also good. And literary structure under the transcendent monomyth, the archetypes, the pagan virtue portfolios, allows all of that to occur – that’s just the logic and science of literature.
but there is no more reason to tolerate the ‘sales’ of parasitic and false marketing of parasitic and false values, than there is any other form of conspiracy to do harm either public or private.
And I don’t think there exists a criticism that’s survivable, unless you say that ‘i don’t care, I want to preserve a means of fraud and parasitism upon the achievements and potential of those who refrain from parasitism and fraud.”
I understand why folks would resist, but you know, truth is what it is: things are true and moral or they are untrue and immoral.
it’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 21:53:00 UTC
WHY DOES UKRAINE NEED EUROPE? OLIGARCHS.
Ukraine was always a tax-toy of other states.
Ukraine was subject to horrors under the Soviets.
Ukraine has been subject to predation and poverty under post soviet oligarchs.
The Ukrainian government and judiciary is OWNED by the oligarchs – and organized crime (the fantasy of libertarians).
If the Ukrainian Government tries to take over oligarchs, it is too weak, and Ukraine will fall into civil war, so that the Russians have an excuse to conquer them again, and deprive them of their potential for a high trust society, sovereignty, and nationhood.
NATO MEANS DEFEAT OF OLIGARCHS AND NATIONHOOD.
Nato + European integration means defeat of the Oligarchs.
Defeat of the oligarchs allows Rule of law.
Rule of law allows credit and risk.
Credit allows risk via entrepreneurship.
Entrepreneurship creates prosperity.
Prosperity saves the Ukrainian people from:
1) predation by the jews of old
2) predation by the soviets of the 20th century.
3) predation by the oligarchs of post soviets.
And eliminates all value of a Russian conquest.
PUTIN FAILED. HE COULD HAVE:
0) Called the Nato leaders personally and told them his plan.(not asked permission)
1) Burned Yanukovich on a stake for his crimes against the people.
2) Provided discount gas to ukraine for a 99 year lease on the black sea coastal territories.
3) Secured the Ukrainian banks that were not already under Russian ownership (few of them)
4) Crushed the Ukrainian Oligarchs “at the request of the ukrainian people”
5) Withdrawn back to russian.
6) Restored the territory, population, trade routes, manufacturing base, and military bases necessary for continued russian restoration of orthodox empire.
7) Caused russia to be forgiven of past sins under the soviets.
AND AS A RESULT PUTIN COULD HAVE:
8) been a fucking world hero, and perhaps the greatest leader of the 21st century.
9) Removed all necessity for the preservation of NATO.
10) Saved the world from any nearby chance of another world war.
Yeah. So. It’s still possible.
WHY ISN’T HE DOING IT?
Stupid.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 09:35:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 17:47:00 UTC