Theme: Predation

  • A Reminder: “I Don’t Hate on Anyone.”

    I’m not anti anyone at all. I’m not a racist in particular. I’m anti parasitism in all its forms, particularly falsehoods. I’m anti-folly. And I’m anti-conflict. Now, Natural Law of cooperation that we call ‘reciprocity’ tells us what NOT to do. So I end up writing a lot of “Reprimands” (as a follower explained recently.) And I write reprimands of pretty much group on earth – particularly my own. Where I come from is this: There was, that I know of, only one enlightenment – that of Britain – and it was purely empirical. Every culture, in response, has resisted that empirical enlightenment. If we were at the end of the french or german or russian counter-enlightenments, I would attack them. but the french, the germans, and the Russians (or at least the jewish Russians) committed suicide. At present we are at the end of the American Christian, and Ashkenazi-jewish counter-enlightenemtns, and in the midst of the Muslim counter-enlightenments. So of course, my work will place greater emphasis on current examples of interest in the current era, than it will on the french, german, and russian. And of course, I criticize the chinese and indian civilizations as well. Now, empirically, I have to accept that the fundamental problem all civilizations face is the underclass, and that all present, past, and even more so future, questions will be determined by how we answer the fundamental problem of the ‘drag’ that the underclasses place upon mankind. And I understand that this is a difficult problem. But that single problem is solved by soft eugenics: one child policy for the unproductive, and paying them to have either one child only or no children at all. This will, as a consequence attach status to having multiple children, and … attach lack of status to those with wealth that do not. And this is the only solution I know of that is achieved by reciprocity under natural law. So if I offend you then you must answer these questions differently. And you will, of necessity, have a very difficult time finding a better method of calculating a happy prosperous mankind without entering into hubris or deceit.
    Apr 04, 2018 11:17am
  • A Reminder: “I Don’t Hate on Anyone.”

    I’m not anti anyone at all. I’m not a racist in particular. I’m anti parasitism in all its forms, particularly falsehoods. I’m anti-folly. And I’m anti-conflict. Now, Natural Law of cooperation that we call ‘reciprocity’ tells us what NOT to do. So I end up writing a lot of “Reprimands” (as a follower explained recently.) And I write reprimands of pretty much group on earth – particularly my own. Where I come from is this: There was, that I know of, only one enlightenment – that of Britain – and it was purely empirical. Every culture, in response, has resisted that empirical enlightenment. If we were at the end of the french or german or russian counter-enlightenments, I would attack them. but the french, the germans, and the Russians (or at least the jewish Russians) committed suicide. At present we are at the end of the American Christian, and Ashkenazi-jewish counter-enlightenemtns, and in the midst of the Muslim counter-enlightenments. So of course, my work will place greater emphasis on current examples of interest in the current era, than it will on the french, german, and russian. And of course, I criticize the chinese and indian civilizations as well. Now, empirically, I have to accept that the fundamental problem all civilizations face is the underclass, and that all present, past, and even more so future, questions will be determined by how we answer the fundamental problem of the ‘drag’ that the underclasses place upon mankind. And I understand that this is a difficult problem. But that single problem is solved by soft eugenics: one child policy for the unproductive, and paying them to have either one child only or no children at all. This will, as a consequence attach status to having multiple children, and … attach lack of status to those with wealth that do not. And this is the only solution I know of that is achieved by reciprocity under natural law. So if I offend you then you must answer these questions differently. And you will, of necessity, have a very difficult time finding a better method of calculating a happy prosperous mankind without entering into hubris or deceit.
    Apr 04, 2018 11:17am
  • A REMINDER: “I DON’T HATE ON ANYONE.” I’m not anti anyone at all. I’m not a raci

    A REMINDER: “I DON’T HATE ON ANYONE.”

    I’m not anti anyone at all. I’m not a racist in particular. I’m anti parasitism in all its forms, particularly falsehoods. I’m anti-folly. And I’m anti-conflict.

    Now, Natural Law of cooperation that we call ‘reciprocity’ tells us what NOT to do. So I end up writing a lot of “Reprimands” (as a follower explained recently.)

    And I write reprimands of pretty much group on earth – particularly my own.

    Where I come from is this: There was, that I know of, only one enlightenment – that of Britain – and it was purely empirical. Every culture, in response, has resisted that empirical enlightenment.

    If we were at the end of the french or german or russian counter-enlightenments, I would attack them. but the french, the germans, and the Russians (or at least the jewish Russians) committed suicide.

    At present we are at the end of the American Christian, and Ashkenazi-jewish counter-enlightenemtns, and in the midst of the Muslim counter-enlightenments.

    So of course, my work will place greater emphasis on current examples of interest in the current era, than it will on the french, german, and russian.

    And of course, I criticize the chinese and indian civilizations as well.

    Now, empirically, I have to accept that the fundamental problem all civilizations face is the underclass, and that all present, past, and even more so future, questions will be determined by how we answer the fundamental problem of the ‘drag’ that the underclasses place upon mankind.

    And I understand that this is a difficult problem. But that single problem is solved by soft eugenics: one child policy for the unproductive, and paying them to have either one child only or no children at all. This will, as a consequence attach status to having multiple children, and … attach lack of status to those with wealth that do not.

    And this is the only solution I know of that is achieved by reciprocity under natural law.

    So if I offend you then you must answer these questions differently. And you will, of necessity, have a very difficult time finding a better method of calculating a happy prosperous mankind without entering into hubris or deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 11:17:00 UTC

  • You know, when you start from the presumption that it is better to kill, enslave

    You know, when you start from the presumption that it is better to kill, enslave, enserf, and otherwise rule others for profit, rather than cooperate with them, or tolerate their parasitism, the choice between boycott, cooperation, and predation becomes much clearer. Time to Prey


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 18:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979424659417550848

  • RT @Outsideness: … History is basically genocide and rape, with a little addit

    RT @Outsideness: … History is basically genocide and rape, with a little additional surface detailing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 16:10:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979390309665837056

  • The purpose of all left argumentation is not truth, not exchange, but power in o

    The purpose of all left argumentation is not truth, not exchange, but power in order to circumvent their need to exchange. Because in exchange, they are always at a disadvantage if for no other reason than a lack of agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 00:49:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979158683891503104

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979102820744929281


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979102820744929281

  • Do White People Feel Uncomfortable When They Hear Non-whites Mention The Word “racist” Around Them?

    Because when a white person is called a racist, they understand (a) they are being alienated by the threat of violence (b) they are being alienated so that others can achieve self image by denigrating others, (c) they are aware that only european whites and east asians have succeeded in building high trust polities. (d) they are aware the critics are just hateful and envious.

    “No man is a hero to his debtors.”

    And the whole world is our debtor.

    We dragged makinkind one civilization at a time out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, tyranny, the vicissitudes of nature, and the uncertainty of a universe hostile to human life, and they resisted, kicking and screaming all the while. All these people are doing is kicking and screaming at being dragged out of their ancestral childhoods.

    A parent must never take the words of his teenagers seriously, any more than europeans must take the words of the underclasses seriously.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-white-people-feel-uncomfortable-when-they-hear-non-whites-mention-the-word-racist-around-them

  • “Reciprocity commands conflict and predation outside the threshold of useful of

    —“Reciprocity commands conflict and predation outside the threshold of useful of cooperation.”— Simon Ström


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 15:57:00 UTC

  • The low IQ Gypsies specialize in mobility, low level parasitism and predation, a

    The low IQ Gypsies specialize in mobility, low level parasitism and predation, and punishing members for honest labor. Agrarians had to develop norms, traditions, traits that allowed them to hold territory. Pastoralists never produced commons, and retained their clannishness.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 20:54:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975475627376693248

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975475072461832198


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit There are only three possible means of human coercion: violence, remuneration(payment), and undermining (gossip). ie: Established males, ascendent males, and females. We are very artful in combining them. But still specialize.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975475072461832198


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit There are only three possible means of human coercion: violence, remuneration(payment), and undermining (gossip). ie: Established males, ascendent males, and females. We are very artful in combining them. But still specialize.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975475072461832198

  • The weak submit, justify and breed, the able compromise and prosper, the strong

    The weak submit, justify and breed, the able compromise and prosper, the strong decide only whether it is better to kill, enslave, enserf, rule, or cooperate Only they decide their destiny. The question of why the strong choose poorly is the only interesting question to ask.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 18:36:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975440943750008832