Theme: Predation

  • KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM by Luke Weinhagen Understanding this: —-“

    KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Understanding this:

    —-“There exist only three possible relations (avoidance, cooperation, conflict).”—-

    … and developing the skill to accurately identify these categories, makes everything Propertarianism is exploring understandable and in context.

    Where I’ve had misses in comprehension has consistently been where I’ve mis-categorized one or more of those three as another in whatever relation is being explored.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 13:28:00 UTC

  • Baiting Into Harm

    I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.

  • Baiting Into Harm

    I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.

  • THE SOLUTION TO MISMANAGEMENT OF THE COMMONS by Ely Harman If resources (power,

    THE SOLUTION TO MISMANAGEMENT OF THE COMMONS

    by Ely Harman

    If resources (power, territory, capital, subject population) are being mismanaged, then entrepreneurs of violence can profit by taking them over and putting them to more productive or sustainable uses.

    Hostile takeover.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 07:55:00 UTC

  • The Limit to The Value of Cooperation

    Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.

  • The Limit to The Value of Cooperation

    Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.

  • ***So what I’m getting at, is the possibility that the middle east conflict zone

    ***So what I’m getting at, is the possibility that the middle east conflict zone increased tribalism and aggression which it exported, not that we started out more aggressive and have become less so.***

    (Worth Repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:44:00 UTC

  • THE LIMIT TO THE VALUE OF COOPERATION Cooperation is only valuable until it’s no

    THE LIMIT TO THE VALUE OF COOPERATION

    Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 10:15:00 UTC

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF WAR We are only engaged in reciprocity if we are cooperating. i

    TERNARY LOGIC OF WAR

    We are only engaged in reciprocity if we are cooperating. if we are not cooperating because of lack of shared opportunity that is still reciprocity. If we are not cooperating because of predation or parasitism, then that is war.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:59:00 UTC

  • The Law of Speech

    1 – the only rational reason to cooperate is because it is more rewarding than both non-cooperation AND predation. 2 – the only rational terms of cooperation that are more rewarding than non-cooperation and predation are those of reciprocity. 3 – Reciprocity is only possible because of truthful (fully informed), productive, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of externality. 4 – The only grammars of truthful speech are the operational. 5 – If You do not speak in operational grammars then you do not speak truthfully, with warranty, particularly of warranty against externality. 6 – If you did not speak then we could merely avoid one another. 7 – And ergo, if you speak in critique (deceit, fraud, hazard) there is no reason to refrain from predation, since you have both voided boycott and cooperation.