Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 00:00:00 UTC
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.
—“Parasitism will persist as long as we don’t have territorial self determination to escape it.”— Andy Ujku
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 22:47:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058490885493657600
—“Parasitism will persist as long as we don’t have territorial self determination to escape it.”— Andy Ujku
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 18:47:00 UTC
http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/RAHIM MAKES TELLS THE STORY SO THAT I DON’T HAVE TO:
The Weaponization of the Commons as means of FUNDING the KNIGHTS.
Rahim Taghizadegan, Why Are Western Europens So Naive (PFS 2018)
http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 14:10:00 UTC
October 30th, 2018 3:14 PM COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Industrial Complex branches: – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics) – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics) Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex. Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex. (excellent)
October 30th, 2018 2:13 PM “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen [I]n taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”. It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker. We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”. What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match. In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.
October 30th, 2018 3:14 PM COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Industrial Complex branches: – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics) – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics) Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex. Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex. (excellent)
October 30th, 2018 2:13 PM “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen [I]n taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”. It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker. We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”. What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match. In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.