You are clearly our enemy, and have declared yourself so. As such we will not share with you. We may trade with you – if you have anything to trade. If you are an enemy, and we cannot trade with you, then there is only one choice remaining: war. And we revel in it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 17:07:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059130137210470401
Most of all free riding, parasitism, theft, fraud, as attempts to cover thefts should be shamed, punished, and punished so severely that it is not repeated. I mean, that’s what the law is for. Criminalizing parasites on both the private and commons. đ
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:14:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059116699411271682
Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable â we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017
No no no. It’s that I make, we make, a full accounting of costs. And we suppress free riding, parasitism, fraud, duplicity, and dysgenia. LIke I said. You are thieves and we defend capital. Hyperconsumption, vs Anti Parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:13:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059116358506557442
Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable â we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017
Us? We are disgusted by animals, parasitism and dysgenia in the commons. I don’t, we don’t fear anyone. Me and mine? We’re “The Ones Who Knock”. And if you weren’t afraid of that fact then you wouldn’t live in terror of us.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 14:30:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059090588472090624
Reply addressees: @LibrarianVee @_Kevin_Pham
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059083097390624768
IN REPLY TO:
@LibrarianVee
@_Kevin_Pham @curtdoolittle Fear and dislike of people you âwellâ donât like
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059083097390624768
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45431003_10156755022457264_3814271274876665856_o_10156755022452264.jpg WHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….
This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.
The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.
(I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)Noah J RevoyThe more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.Nov 4, 2018, 9:42 AMCurt Doolittleperfect.Nov 4, 2018, 9:43 AMDaniel Roland AndersonNailed it Noah J Revoy.
If you look at my political progression, itâs a reflection of a decrease in trust and an increase in anger:
Reaganite Cold Warrior (civnat) (I trust anyone who isnât a communist or a sympathizer.)
Buchananite Paleocon
I stop trusting Establishment Republicans who want to keep our troops out there and wonât defend our culture here. I begin to suspect that most non-whites donât share my beliefs, but trust that they can be converted.
Ethno-nationalist: I trust my people, find Kevin MacDonald, and name the âenemy who hath done this.â (Matt. 13:28-30. Great parable, btw!) Yes, I still trust Christianity here.
Alt Right: I donât trust most of my own people, but believe they can be converted. Anger rising.
Full Fash Propertarian: Let those that convert, convert. Suppress those that donât. Destroy those that resist. Timeâs up.
If thereâs a step from here, that step canât be far from near total destruction. And Iâd be so angry at that point, I wouldnât care.
Interestingly, anger has actually focused, but mellowed. Iâm less affected by anger than ever. Itâs a math problem.
Things will play out deterministically, and I trust that whatever role I have to play (commensurate with my level of agency) will be sufficient.
Sufficient to what? Sufficient to be remembered by those that come after if we win, and sufficient to look at myself in the mirror one last time and say âyou have fought the good fight; you have run your course; you have found and kept the true faith.â
I donât need more than this.Nov 4, 2018, 11:58 AMGL SevierAbsolutely, spot on, increase in anger and decrease in trust, and just like the conservative to paleo to ethno, to alt right, there is no going back.Nov 4, 2018, 3:53 PMElgin McConnell LoneyThat goes both ways, NoahNov 4, 2018, 8:04 PMJoe FossLeftist fear is different than conservative fear.
The left is “scary-wow-bad” while the right is essentially “will we make it?”
Undirected general fear. Also known as concernNov 5, 2018, 6:07 AMCurt Doolittleshort term long termNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMCurt DoolittleyesNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMJames Lyons Sr.Ain’t scared!
Cept bears, bears gonna eatNov 5, 2018, 5:39 PMWHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….
This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.
The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.
(I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:33:00 UTC
RETURN TO OUR PRIMARY INDUSTRY: DOMESTICATION
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it.
Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:10:00 UTC
THE LEFT “DEBATE” STRATEGY ISN’T TO DEBATE
Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.
The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits.
Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique.
Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”.
The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency.
It’s that simple.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 07:11:00 UTC
Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 04:00:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058932090224418817
Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 03:59:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058931842592727041
Reply addressees: @yossy770 @getongab @Mottel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058930277152686080
IN REPLY TO:
@yossy770
@getongab Dear @getongab you have enough trouble on your plate right now I wouldn’t recommend you add @Mottel to that pile. He was doing you a favor by pointing out your error.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058930277152686080
Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 03:58:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058931355709509633
Reply addressees: @PopChassid
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058928524592058368
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable â we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058928524592058368