If participants (participation) in a market cannot punish (selective refusal of exchange [ban]) their bad actors (peers) then neither can they reward (select for favorable exchange) the trusted actors for gain, since the black hat bad actors will forever have incentive to target, attack, undermine and displace the white hat trusted party (worthy, desirable), and therefore can be relied upon to act on those nefarious incentives.
It is my opinion the above describes the modern western experience of the now.
The difference between what occurs in a) the faster markets and b) in the West overall is not outcome but only c) time.
Reciprocity will assume, emerge. Natural law. Markets in everything.
—“A Senegalese bus driver in Italy tried to burn 52 children to death today. Had he pulled it off, I think it would have been the final straw.”–Greg Hamilton
Parasites will fight against separation from their hosts as if their lives depend on it, because to a large extent they do.
A credible threat might reduce costs compared to an all out conflict, but it doesn’t seem cheap to make a sufficiently credible threat either.
It would have to convince the free riders at the top and at the bottom that their slim chances on their own are better odds than they have with free riding on the middle.
If they could live well without the western middle class, they wouldn’t be here to begin with.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_3199328431644868608_o_10157055895227264.jpg OPEN SEASON.Corey HarmsHANG EM UP AND BLEED EM OUT!Mar 18, 2019, 1:17 AMHoward Van Der KlauwBlocked yet?Mar 18, 2019, 1:18 AMCurt DoolittleJohn MarkMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMSolomon VolodymyrWant to see it happenMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMPhilip SaundersStephan Kinsella keeps stating things are “not libertarian” as if this is an argument.Mar 18, 2019, 1:29 AMJames PortocarreroMar 18, 2019, 1:31 AMPhilip SaundersYikes.Mar 18, 2019, 1:33 AMCurt Doolittle(((ethics)))Mar 18, 2019, 1:34 AMPhilip SaundersLow trust afMar 18, 2019, 1:36 AMVince Reefuck that guys a piece of shitMar 18, 2019, 1:40 AMConnor SumnersLol I love this. I may have to make a portrait in this theme of Curt now.Mar 18, 2019, 1:41 AMJosef KalininI’ve always found Libertarian individualism to be a grotesque rebranding of hedonistic egoism and an immensely hateable rationalistic reductionism. It’s easy to ignore the problems of society when you define the individual and his direct self-interest as the highest category of importance and explain literally the entirety of human dynamics according to the egoistic paradigm. They don’t care about issues like racial suicide and demographic replacement because the entire concept of an ethnic identity is too collectivist for them and they would happily see the world blend together into mystery meat under some utopian view of a world of individuals without nations, cultures, or otherwise “collectivist” blankets defining them.
TLDR, libertarians are sellouts, and deserve 9mm hollow point inside the backs of their skulls.Mar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMSaber LambertHes a fucking lawyer what did you expect hahaMar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMFelix RyanGarbage rothbardian ethics.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMJosef KalininThe fucking constitution itself is anti-libertarian because it’s not a private document.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMFelix RyanJosef Kalinin nice.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMCurt DoolittleJosef Kalinin Shit. That made me laugh hard… lolMar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMFelix RyanI can hear the hand rubbing when he tweets that.Mar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMRyan WilliamsTear him to bits and shit on the remains. His ghetto pilpul libertarian freeriding must die.Mar 18, 2019, 1:54 AMM Shawn DavisMuh philosophical purityMar 18, 2019, 1:55 AMAdam DavidI used to call myself a libertarian.
The special mystery meat blanderup was the fundamental hangup i had which lead me to search out a better way.
Lets expose them to P law before putting them against the metaphorical wall.Mar 18, 2019, 2:17 AMJohn EdwardThey violated the rights of the people who worked hard to get degrees from those schools without cheating/bribing. You reduce the value of the good (diploma) by issuing counterfeits.Mar 18, 2019, 2:46 AMMichael D HaasWhat an idiotMar 18, 2019, 3:45 AMPaddy LynchCurt’s giant dick busts more hips than old age and car accidents combinedMar 18, 2019, 3:55 AMPhill KnyspelThe sophist takes on Doolittle . Round 1 ding ding hahaMar 18, 2019, 4:17 AMJaromír MiškovskýOk Ideology with with such strong dictionary that it can be translated to call computer porgram. Vs. project where dig accros multiple sources. Hmm….Mar 18, 2019, 4:26 AMSolomon VolodymyrI used to be L before I realised that utopian state of non-coercion can’t exist for most peoples. That’s where P comes in.Mar 18, 2019, 5:16 AMMathuin HillgarthStephanie who???Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMathuin HillgarthGotta love autocorrect to aid in an insultMar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMSolomon VolodymyrIt’s our insurance, guaranteeing liberty by seizing sovereignty; removing parasitism by promising reciprocity.Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMicah PezdirtzAnyone calling P nonsense just demonstrates to me the state of their denial.Mar 18, 2019, 6:10 AMEric BestPhilip Saunders his rhetoric is very “religious.”Mar 18, 2019, 6:59 AMHans JohanssonModern libertarianism has essentially turned into corporate neoliberalism.Mar 18, 2019, 7:13 AMEly HarmanBuying your way into college is a lot less stupid and destructive than affirmative action. At least the money benefits the merit based admissions and compensates them for putting up with fuckwit heirs. And if people make something of THEIR lives, I don’t see the harm in giving their children a shot.Mar 18, 2019, 9:04 AMMoritz BierlingIt would be ok if they openly said that you can buy admissionMar 18, 2019, 9:22 AMCurt DoolittleMoritz Bierling correctMar 18, 2019, 10:38 AMJoseph RossI agree with you Curt. Even if I thought you were wrong I wouldn’t side with Kinsella because he had a blue check mark he doesn’t deserve.Mar 18, 2019, 9:26 PMJoseph RossKinsella is someone who just needs to be laughed at. He literally said it’s not a NAP violation to steal bitcoins because there’s no contract involved since it’s decentralized. According to him, since it isn’t a NAP violation there’s no recourse against someone who steals them.Mar 18, 2019, 9:28 PMJimmy KnowlesHe goes over the wallMar 18, 2019, 9:29 PMMichael PattinsonAll this years with HHH and still winging like a little girl.LolMar 19, 2019, 2:50 AMVince Reeoy vey all this antisemetic dog whistlingMar 19, 2019, 2:55 AMJC TrottStealing a seat at a college is “Libertarian”?
Doesn’t that offend the NAP?Mar 19, 2019, 6:15 AMPhilip SaundersJC Trott the point is that it’s done under the table, rather than openly (which would be fine). There is a false pretence of a purely meritocratic game.
Also, it has potential to counterfeit the value of the qualification.Mar 19, 2019, 6:21 AMCréachán Ó NáraighPlease take down his intellectual communism in the most public and conclusive manner. It’s already been done but it needs to be done again for a new audience. Example:
https://strangerousthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/the-economic-principles-of-intellectual-property-and-the-fallacies-of-intellectual-communism/Mar 20, 2019, 12:05 AMDerek YoungFormer libertarian! John Mark has introduced me to Propertarianism! Amazing stuff!Mar 20, 2019, 9:19 AMRichard HeathenMar 22, 2019, 6:32 PMOPEN SEASON.
—“If I and mine CAN exterminate you, then why should I and mine NOT exterminate you? At present since you are a threat, it is rational to exterminate you. Therefore we need a reason NOT to exterminate you. What is that reason”— Emissary of Genghis Khan.
THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY?
1. Philosophy (choice) why not commit suicide?
2. Ethics (choice) why not commit murder?
3. Politics (choice) why not commit genocide?
Without first answering these questions, you cannot answer all questions upon which those answers depend.
Rather than engage in a conversation under pretext, simply ask the question “Why do I not at least TRY for murder or genocide if this means more for me and mine?”
Cooperation is only valuable until it is not.
Tolerance is only valuable until it is not.
Otherwise, genocide, and seizure of assets are superior options.
Ergo, this is the reason to ‘cooperate’ reciprocally.
ALWAYS START ANY DEBATE BY ASKING “WHY NOT END YOU FOR FUN AND PROFIT?”
I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. It’s not just usury. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard. Instead, it’s every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and crique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional.
It ends now.
De-financialization, De-politicization, De-distinformationalization, and restoration of our eugenic group evolutionary strategy in our own self interest.
It’s easy.
The law. The most intolerant law ever made.
With the law we make the extirpation of parasites a for-profit business for every citizen of character
I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
