(FB 1551988756 Timestamp) “THE GOYIM KNOW” Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. It’s not just usury. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard. Instead, it’s every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and crique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional. It ends now. De-financialization, De-politicization, De-distinformationalization, and restoration of our eugenic group evolutionary strategy in our own self interest. It’s easy. The law. The most intolerant law ever made. With the law we make the extirpation of parasites a for-profit business for every citizen of character Propertarianism.
Theme: Predation
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551982215 Timestamp) I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551982215 Timestamp) I’m against the ancestral method of competition: false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552688457 Timestamp) “In Wars of Genes, You don’t change hearts; You stop them from beating.” (Doolittle’s 42nd Law of War)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552688457 Timestamp) “In Wars of Genes, You don’t change hearts; You stop them from beating.” (Doolittle’s 42nd Law of War)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552749174 Timestamp) LESSONS FROM GENGHIS KHAN The first question of outgroup politics: —“If I and mine CAN exterminate you, then why should I and mine NOT exterminate you? At present since you are a threat, it is rational to exterminate you. Therefore we need a reason NOT to exterminate you. What is that reason”— Emissary of Genghis Khan. THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY?
- Philosophy (choice) why not commit suicide?
- Ethics (choice) why not commit murder?
- Politics (choice) why not commit genocide?
Without first answering these questions, you cannot answer all questions upon which those answers depend. Rather than engage in a conversation under pretext, simply ask the question “Why do I not at least TRY for murder or genocide if this means more for me and mine?” Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Tolerance is only valuable until it is not. Otherwise, genocide, and seizure of assets are superior options. Ergo, this is the reason to ‘cooperate’ reciprocally. ALWAYS START ANY DEBATE BY ASKING “WHY NOT END YOU FOR FUN AND PROFIT?”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552749174 Timestamp) LESSONS FROM GENGHIS KHAN The first question of outgroup politics: —“If I and mine CAN exterminate you, then why should I and mine NOT exterminate you? At present since you are a threat, it is rational to exterminate you. Therefore we need a reason NOT to exterminate you. What is that reason”— Emissary of Genghis Khan. THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY?
- Philosophy (choice) why not commit suicide?
- Ethics (choice) why not commit murder?
- Politics (choice) why not commit genocide?
Without first answering these questions, you cannot answer all questions upon which those answers depend. Rather than engage in a conversation under pretext, simply ask the question “Why do I not at least TRY for murder or genocide if this means more for me and mine?” Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Tolerance is only valuable until it is not. Otherwise, genocide, and seizure of assets are superior options. Ergo, this is the reason to ‘cooperate’ reciprocally. ALWAYS START ANY DEBATE BY ASKING “WHY NOT END YOU FOR FUN AND PROFIT?”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552886845 Timestamp) JUDGING A RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, OR IDEOLOGY —There are good people everywhere. But it’s not the good people we worry about. it’s the bad people. And we must if we are honest not measure a philosophy ideology or religion by it’s good but by its bad. Why? because there are good people who will fit into anything anywhere. The question is, how do these philosophies, ideologies, or religions, prohibit their bad people? By these measures, islam and judaism are the most evil religions of all. The reason is that they justify those very desires that all other religions evolved to suppress: lying.— (worth repeating)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552886845 Timestamp) JUDGING A RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, OR IDEOLOGY —There are good people everywhere. But it’s not the good people we worry about. it’s the bad people. And we must if we are honest not measure a philosophy ideology or religion by it’s good but by its bad. Why? because there are good people who will fit into anything anywhere. The question is, how do these philosophies, ideologies, or religions, prohibit their bad people? By these measures, islam and judaism are the most evil religions of all. The reason is that they justify those very desires that all other religions evolved to suppress: lying.— (worth repeating)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553088597 Timestamp) THE PARASITES WILL FIGHT by Alain Dwight Parasites will fight against separation from their hosts as if their lives depend on it, because to a large extent they do. A credible threat might reduce costs compared to an all out conflict, but it doesn’t seem cheap to make a sufficiently credible threat either. It would have to convince the free riders at the top and at the bottom that their slim chances on their own are better odds than they have with free riding on the middle. If they could live well without the western middle class, they wouldn’t be here to begin with.