Dec 23, 2019, 8:20 PM (worth repeating) Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the village The men sharpened knives and the boys dreamt of pillage. The skulls were all hung by the chimney with care In hopes on the morrow, more would be there. The girls were nestled all snug in their beds, While visions of jewelry, danced in their heads. And mamma in her gown, and I in my shirt, Had just caught our breath from a quick winter’s flirt. When out on the river there arose such a clatter, I sprang from the bed, to see what was the matter. Away to the Hall, I flew in a rush, Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash. The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below. When, what to my wondering eyes should appear, But a longboat with shields, and great men with their gear. With a bearded old man, lively and wisened, I knew in a moment it must be Lord Odin. More rapid than eagles his warriors they came, And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name! “Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now, Prancer and Vixen! On, Comet! On, Cupid! on, Donner and Blitzen! To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall! Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!” As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky. So up to the house-top the coursers they flew, With bags full of booty, and Lord Odin too. And then, in a twinkling, I heard at the door The laughter of brethren hardened by war. As I drew in my head, and was turning around, Lord Odin, through the portal, came with a bound. He was dressed all in grey, from his head to his foot, And his clothes were all fouled with snow and with soot. A bundle of booty he had flung on his back, And he looked like a merchant, just opening his pack. His eyes-how they twinkled! his laughter how merry! His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry! The beard of his chin was as white as the snow, And his purses, hung neatly, from his belt, in a row. The stump of a pipe, he held tight, in his teeth, And the smoke it, encircled his head, like a wreath. He had a long face, pointed hat, and grey cloak, That shook when he laughed, like the bough of an oak. He was tall and thin, but a jolly old elf, And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself! But a wink of his eye, and a twist of his head, Soon gave me to know, I had nothing to dread. He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work, And filled all the stockings, then turned with a jerk. And laying his finger, aside of his cheek, And giving a nod, tossed my share to my feet. He sprang to his boots, and to men gave a whistle, And away we all flew like the down of a thistle. And I heard him exclaim, ‘ere we ran into the night, “Happy Viking to all, and to all a good-fight!” -Curt Doolittle (With Apologies to Clement Moore) Edit
Theme: Predation
-
Peace Is Just War by Non-Military Means.
Jan 29, 2020, 8:17 PM We are always at war. Evolution is warfare. Politics and economics are simply productive means of warfare. Anglos domesticated economic warfare, but the chinese and europeans have broken it. Europeans domesticated military warfare but russians and iranians and muslims have broken it. And the Chinese are in the process of breaking it, so we are back to undomesticated warfare, of man against man huddling in subterranean tunnels trying to escape swarms of automated weaponry that will rapidly replace tanks and artillery. Peace is just war by non-military means.
-
Peace Is Just War by Non-Military Means.
Jan 29, 2020, 8:17 PM We are always at war. Evolution is warfare. Politics and economics are simply productive means of warfare. Anglos domesticated economic warfare, but the chinese and europeans have broken it. Europeans domesticated military warfare but russians and iranians and muslims have broken it. And the Chinese are in the process of breaking it, so we are back to undomesticated warfare, of man against man huddling in subterranean tunnels trying to escape swarms of automated weaponry that will rapidly replace tanks and artillery. Peace is just war by non-military means.
-
Reaction to Progressive Threats Against Conservatives
Feb 4, 2020, 3:44 PM
—“Dear Democrats, Liberals, and Leftists: (a) when you threaten to disarm us (b) to put us into ‘re-education camps, (c) to replace us, or worse, we take this as a threat and a promise – and we understand – and maybe you should understand, that our ethic is not equality but reciprocity – and as such you are giving license to do to you what you threatened to do to us. We are going to restore collective punishment. We won’t discriminate. If you don’t police your own, you’re advocating their behavior. So you’re all equally guilty.”—
-
Reaction to Progressive Threats Against Conservatives
Feb 4, 2020, 3:44 PM
—“Dear Democrats, Liberals, and Leftists: (a) when you threaten to disarm us (b) to put us into ‘re-education camps, (c) to replace us, or worse, we take this as a threat and a promise – and we understand – and maybe you should understand, that our ethic is not equality but reciprocity – and as such you are giving license to do to you what you threatened to do to us. We are going to restore collective punishment. We won’t discriminate. If you don’t police your own, you’re advocating their behavior. So you’re all equally guilty.”—
-
The Real Power Analysis
At the end of the day, all power flows from the end of a g-u-n. “But any rightwing force would be demonized heavily by our enemies.” Of course. Always go back to the main point – no matter how badly our enemies slander & demonize us, they have no enforcement arm they can fully/confidently count on. This is a very different situation to WW2 where the USA, its population without internet/alternative info sources, was rallied to defeat Germany with military might. Who are our enemies going to rally to crush “those evil Trump supporters”? Our military voted 2/3rds Trump. Cops questionable but the only data I’ve seen shows they are at least at a basic level mostly pro-2A, and are only staffed for barebones crime suppression anyway. Even if our enemies could count 100% on those 2 groups (they can’t, but just for the sake of argument), sheer numbers and 4G warfare aspect are still massively in our favor. Also most sheriffs seem to be far better than cops. Some say our enemies will bring in UN troops, as if that would somehow turn the tide. No one who says that knows how small UN troops are in number. Some say the establishment will bring in chinese troops. But China has very little expeditionary military capability, and more importantly there are a lot of other reasons the establishment is highly unlikely to do that, & China would be highly unlikely to agree. China’s economy is totally dependent on ours. It would also, given that our military voted 2/3rds Trump, amount to the invasion of one nuclear power by another – highly, highly unlikely. If the US govt has to bring in foreign armies to kill their own citizens, it’s an open admission that they have very little favor with their own citizens & can’t control their own population. Even if they did bring in UN or foreign troops, it would activate far more rightwingers to fight – any moral hesitation rightwingers have (the only thing currently holding back the right – “maybe there’s another solution” – would instantly disappear), and it would be open season, all-out, no-holds-barred war. The establishment does not want this. They want to manage the status quo decline & skim off the top parasitically. Massive conflict is very bad for biz. Trillions lost per day. The whole world (the world economy largely depends on USA) would be begging to restore normalcy. This is a very different situation than Germany in WW2, because the “teams” that have ability to project force, and the incentives of those teams, are very different in their power balance. Our enemies’ only possible enforcement arms: U.S. military – voted 2/3rds Trump Cops – mostly pro-2A, staffed only for bare minimum crime suppression Sheriffs – largely on the Right side UN troops – small in number, negative consequences of bringing them in to U.S. soil exceed the benefits Chinese troops – extremely unlikely for various reasons, negative consequences exceed benefits Other foreign troops – extremely unlikely for various reasons, negative consequences exceed the benefits, foreign troops would be essentially paid mercenaries, we’d be fighting for our lives, our people, our civilization Left grassroots – far, far fewer guns than us, not “into” force/guns as a lifestyle/norm Inner city gangs – more of a liability than a benefit to the left, especially in 4G scenario Mexican/Central American drug cartels – relatively small in terms of sheer numbers, PR nightmare to employ FBI/other 3-letter agency goons – small in number NPCs/normies – will not fight for either side, want comfort/ease, some/many may hate the Right but all will benefit the Right bcuz they will cry out for restoration of order at any cost. There, that’s it – a full list of our enemies’ potential enforcement arms. Pretty pitiful. And even IF they could get the entire U.S. military (2M, many not frontlines), all cops (600k), and the entire Chinese military (2M, many not frontlines) to obey them 100%, we would still outnumber them 20-to-1 (roughly 40 million grassroots rightwing men), our team would also have 10 times more former U.S. military than our enemies current militaries, and our enemies would still have major difficulty countering 4G warfare. This answers the question “Does the Right have a chance of winning in a conflict?” (Yes. A very, very good chance. Even if our numbers were dramatically lower than they are, ease of 4G warfare BY ITSELF – the difficulty of defeating it & maintaining/restoring order – gives the Right a major advantage.) The next question is “To what extent will the Right fight? (How many will fight?)” That, each man must answer for himself. But the excuse “I don’t know if we have a chance of winning” is illegitimate.
-
The Real Power Analysis
At the end of the day, all power flows from the end of a g-u-n. “But any rightwing force would be demonized heavily by our enemies.” Of course. Always go back to the main point – no matter how badly our enemies slander & demonize us, they have no enforcement arm they can fully/confidently count on. This is a very different situation to WW2 where the USA, its population without internet/alternative info sources, was rallied to defeat Germany with military might. Who are our enemies going to rally to crush “those evil Trump supporters”? Our military voted 2/3rds Trump. Cops questionable but the only data I’ve seen shows they are at least at a basic level mostly pro-2A, and are only staffed for barebones crime suppression anyway. Even if our enemies could count 100% on those 2 groups (they can’t, but just for the sake of argument), sheer numbers and 4G warfare aspect are still massively in our favor. Also most sheriffs seem to be far better than cops. Some say our enemies will bring in UN troops, as if that would somehow turn the tide. No one who says that knows how small UN troops are in number. Some say the establishment will bring in chinese troops. But China has very little expeditionary military capability, and more importantly there are a lot of other reasons the establishment is highly unlikely to do that, & China would be highly unlikely to agree. China’s economy is totally dependent on ours. It would also, given that our military voted 2/3rds Trump, amount to the invasion of one nuclear power by another – highly, highly unlikely. If the US govt has to bring in foreign armies to kill their own citizens, it’s an open admission that they have very little favor with their own citizens & can’t control their own population. Even if they did bring in UN or foreign troops, it would activate far more rightwingers to fight – any moral hesitation rightwingers have (the only thing currently holding back the right – “maybe there’s another solution” – would instantly disappear), and it would be open season, all-out, no-holds-barred war. The establishment does not want this. They want to manage the status quo decline & skim off the top parasitically. Massive conflict is very bad for biz. Trillions lost per day. The whole world (the world economy largely depends on USA) would be begging to restore normalcy. This is a very different situation than Germany in WW2, because the “teams” that have ability to project force, and the incentives of those teams, are very different in their power balance. Our enemies’ only possible enforcement arms: U.S. military – voted 2/3rds Trump Cops – mostly pro-2A, staffed only for bare minimum crime suppression Sheriffs – largely on the Right side UN troops – small in number, negative consequences of bringing them in to U.S. soil exceed the benefits Chinese troops – extremely unlikely for various reasons, negative consequences exceed benefits Other foreign troops – extremely unlikely for various reasons, negative consequences exceed the benefits, foreign troops would be essentially paid mercenaries, we’d be fighting for our lives, our people, our civilization Left grassroots – far, far fewer guns than us, not “into” force/guns as a lifestyle/norm Inner city gangs – more of a liability than a benefit to the left, especially in 4G scenario Mexican/Central American drug cartels – relatively small in terms of sheer numbers, PR nightmare to employ FBI/other 3-letter agency goons – small in number NPCs/normies – will not fight for either side, want comfort/ease, some/many may hate the Right but all will benefit the Right bcuz they will cry out for restoration of order at any cost. There, that’s it – a full list of our enemies’ potential enforcement arms. Pretty pitiful. And even IF they could get the entire U.S. military (2M, many not frontlines), all cops (600k), and the entire Chinese military (2M, many not frontlines) to obey them 100%, we would still outnumber them 20-to-1 (roughly 40 million grassroots rightwing men), our team would also have 10 times more former U.S. military than our enemies current militaries, and our enemies would still have major difficulty countering 4G warfare. This answers the question “Does the Right have a chance of winning in a conflict?” (Yes. A very, very good chance. Even if our numbers were dramatically lower than they are, ease of 4G warfare BY ITSELF – the difficulty of defeating it & maintaining/restoring order – gives the Right a major advantage.) The next question is “To what extent will the Right fight? (How many will fight?)” That, each man must answer for himself. But the excuse “I don’t know if we have a chance of winning” is illegitimate.
-
The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.
Feb 28, 2020, 10:10 AM
—“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer
Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard wth false promise. We know the name of the devil. His name was Abraham. He was from Ur.
-
The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.
Feb 28, 2020, 10:10 AM
—“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer
Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard wth false promise. We know the name of the devil. His name was Abraham. He was from Ur.
-
Two Causes of Conflict: Personality Clusters, Group Strategies
Two (2) big causes of conflict: … 1) personality clusters… 2) group strategy Creating two broad categories of excuses to violate reciprocity with parasitism, and to lie about equality, and make supernatural claims. (CD: John. Smart. Great positioning. wow.)