Curt Doolittle

Theme: Operationalism

  • Notice how you keep throwing out belief and want but not explaining how to opera

    Notice how you keep throwing out belief and want but not explaining how to operational bring about what you’re talking about, Yet I have a hundred thousand words on it.

    (And you apparently don’t know my background either)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 20:42:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224432885211418627

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump Is this an intellectually honest defense? When did you bring up the quebec analogy? Why do you think without uprising that the opposition will come to the table and settle? Why do you think Quebec wouldn’t have settled without it? Why did the US gov’t cave after 3 wks in 67?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump Is this an intellectually honest defense? When did you bring up the quebec analogy? Why do you think without uprising that the opposition will come to the table and settle? Why do you think Quebec wouldn’t have settled without it? Why did the US gov’t cave after 3 wks in 67?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705

  • P IS EASIER THAN THAT by John Mark It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk

    P IS EASIER THAN THAT

    by John Mark

    It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk in “operational language” (and force others to that standard, and to the standard of the 5-pt definition of recipricity) than to go thru a checklist of 2 dozen fallacies. (See my video “Don’t Talk Like a Leftist”.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 09:09:00 UTC

  • This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or opera

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from rousseau to kant to marx to present europe is ‘stuck’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 16:05:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224000942862929924

    Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999940432683009

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999940432683009

  • You are using non- operational terms. Try to say the same thing in operational t

    You are using non- operational terms. Try to say the same thing in operational terms. It will expose that you are trying to steal by fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 15:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223985526971228161

    Reply addressees: @WildHerbWays @SPQRIUS @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984942624858116

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984942624858116

  • It is however, very difficult and time consuming to disambiguate by serializatio

    It is however, very difficult and time consuming to disambiguate by serialization and operationalization, terms across the suite of disciplines, producing a universally commensurable value-neutral language of language, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, and strategy. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 22:33:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223011477076029441

    Reply addressees: @CrasherSmoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222950802441920512

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222950802441920512

  • FIRST STEP IN LEARNING THE PROPERTARIAN METHOD This is one of those surprisingly

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copula_(linguistics)THE FIRST STEP IN LEARNING THE PROPERTARIAN METHOD

    This is one of those surprisingly difficult concepts.

    We avoid the verb to be in operational language becuase it allows you the pretense of knowledge (promising what you can’t promise) without articulating a causal relationship. The simple example being the difference between ‘the book is on the table’ and ‘I promise i recall seeing a book on the table in the hallway’ or ‘I promise i see a book on the table and if you observe the table in the hall you will see a book on it also.” While this is a simple example, this operationalizing of language into testimonial speech makes almost all sophistry and deceit impossible to construct (really). In fact, most sophomoric philosophically ‘profound’ questions cannot be constructed in operational and testimonial terms.

    If you want to know more, spend thirty minutes reading four wiki articles:

    THE COPULA (VERB TO BE)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copula_(linguistics)

    EPRIME (ELIMINATING THE COPULA)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Prime

    PERFORMATIVE (EXISTENTIAL) TRUTH

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Performative

    (then read the rest of the article)

    OPERATIONALISM

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/operationalism

    FALSIFIABILITY

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Falsificationism

    By the use of performative statements, in ePrime, in Operational Vocabulary, we can falsify almost any claim to knowledge, understanding, consistency, coherence, and truth claims simply by the fact that it is almost impossible to state a falsehood in such gramamtical constraints, just as it is almost impossible to make well formed mathematical or programming statements in the grammatical constraints of mathematics in programming.

    DISAMBIGUATION BY SERIALIZATION AND OPERATIONALISM

    Most of P-Logic invovles learning how to disambiguate at term by creating an ordered list of terms (serialization) restating them in operational language, and adjusting their definitions so that they are each unique in meaning, yet represent a point on the spectrum of whatever constant relation you are making use of.

    THis is the first step in learning propertarian methods.Updated Jan 30, 2020, 12:36 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 12:36:00 UTC

  • 1) I don’t make errors. Especially in jurisprudence. Even more so in operational

    1) I don’t make errors. Especially in jurisprudence. Even more so in operational construction – but you don’t know that. 2) Please: how any such entity can come into existence without an human being able to enter into a contract.
    3) Contract requires consent. What can consent?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:27:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222300248825106432

    Reply addressees: @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222285749925531648

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222285749925531648

  • The difference between western thought and all other thought is the difference b

    The difference between western thought and all other thought is the difference between zero and one: infinite. Why? Truth, operationalism, completeness. Yeah, western thought is harder, and less intuitive, and less satisfying and not at all sedating. It is however, the only means by which we have converted the universe to an instrument of man’s will.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 09:19:00 UTC

  • Because the difference between sophism and truth is operationalism

    Because the difference between sophism and truth is operationalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 09:14:00 UTC

  • While this is an advanced topic, no non-trivial systems are closed without appea

    While this is an advanced topic, no non-trivial systems are closed without appeal to reality. (Realism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, internally consistent, testifiable).This is why a proof is only a test of internal consistency and a truth requires coherence(reality).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 21:23:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219007461182582789

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219006767113347072

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DSchrooner Closure (logic): a system(paradigm) wherein a proposition is decidable without appeal to information external to the proposition. i.e. Physical closure, logical closure (internal), closure by analogy(knowledge), closure by intuition(experience), closure by truth vs preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1219006767113347072

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DSchrooner Closure (logic): a system(paradigm) wherein a proposition is decidable without appeal to information external to the proposition. i.e. Physical closure, logical closure (internal), closure by analogy(knowledge), closure by intuition(experience), closure by truth vs preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1219006767113347072