Theme: Measurement

  • Your problem is using a label. Always use operational prose when anything comple

    Your problem is using a label. Always use operational prose when anything complex is necessary. I intentionally use langauge that keeps the nitwits away. But if you are trying to make a point, and reach a lot of people, you can’t use ‘stakeholder capitalism’ because anyone sophisticated enough to understand it thinks its obvious and boring (and secondary to woke) and anyone who needs to underestand will ignore you. Talk cause and effecdt. If you need longer form to do it,t hen pay the eight bucks for blue checkmarks and write longer form.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 07:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640255294788845569

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640246417594912768

  • Your problem is using a label. Always use operational prose when anything comple

    Your problem is using a label. Always use operational prose when anything complex is necessary. I intentionally use langauge that keeps the nitwits away. But if you are trying to make a point, and reach a lot of people, you can’t use ‘stakeholder capitalism’ because anyone sophisticated enough to understand it thinks its obvious and boring (and secondary to woke) and anyone who needs to underestand will ignore you. Talk cause and effecdt. If you need longer form to do it,t hen pay the eight bucks for blue checkmarks and write longer form.

    Reply addressees: @Z3r0An0n


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 07:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640255294709149696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640246417594912768

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @whatifalthist (Advanced topic warning) a) a dimension refers

    RT @curtdoolittle: @whatifalthist (Advanced topic warning)
    a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to disambiguate a reference. O…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 23:46:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639413514296082432

  • (Advanced topic warning) a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to dis

    (Advanced topic warning)
    a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to disambiguate a reference. Or more specifically, in mathematics, to produce a set of vectors that produce a direction of causality that will influence other dimensions of causality. Ergo why we use Manifolds in mathematics to track dense causalities (relations). Our neurons are for all intents and purpose producing vast networks of cause in the manifold that is our neocortex.
    b) The universe only requires three spatial and one time dimensions to describe it. We can use either three linear or two circular(direction) and one linear (scale) dimensions as descriptors.
    c) (Very advanced topic) The universe is incapable of more than those three plus one dimensions – no more dimensions are possible without destroying the prior four.
    d) When we talk of say ten dimensions we are talking about a three step hierarchy of dimensions of causality, each that affects the others within the one time dimensions. In physics this means it is likely that there is at least one more dimension of causality (one more hierarchy of constant states) beneath the quantum background.
    e) Until we end our wasted einsteinian century ‘lost in mathiness’ (pseudoscience), by completing the classical model of the quantum background (we’re close), explaining what we call particles but aren’t (they’re closer to lightning storms that collapse as lightning bolts), and explain the cause of the quantum background we will not know if the speed of light and the mass that results as we compress the quantum background, can be overcome. I have, no one has, any sense as yet whether it’s possible. If not, and, if we cannot capture and use the energy of the quantum background (huge) even if only zero point, then we are ‘not going anywhere fast’.
    f) As such the only dimension we can likely ‘colonize’ is time. And in that sense, given relative time at mass and velocity (or even independent thereof) for all intents and purposes ‘dimensions’ (differeent rates of life histories) will be effectively infinite.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 22:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639386608200818693

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639333629477416961

  • (Advanced topic warning) a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to dis

    (Advanced topic warning)
    a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to disambiguate a reference. Or more specifically, in mathematics, to produce a set of vectors that produce a direction of causality that will influence other dimensions of causality. Ergo why we use Manifolds in mathematics to track dense causalities (relations). Our neurons are for all intents and purpose producing vast networks of cause in the manifold that is our neocortex.
    b) The universe only requires three spatial and one time dimensions to describe it. We can use either three linear or two circular(direction) and one linear (scale) dimensions as descriptors.
    c) (Very advanced topic) The universe is incapable of more than those three plus one dimensions – no more dimensions are possible without destroying the prior four.
    d) When we talk of say ten dimensions we are talking about a three step hierarchy of dimensions of causality, each that affects the others within the one time dimensions. In physics this means it is likely that there is at least one more dimension of causality (one more hierarchy of constant states) beneath the quantum background.
    e) Until we end our wasted einsteinian century ‘lost in mathiness’ (pseudoscience), by completing the classical model of the quantum background (we’re close), explaining what we call particles but aren’t (they’re closer to lightning storms that collapse as lightning bolts), and explain the cause of the quantum background we will not know if the speed of light and the mass that results as we compress the quantum background, can be overcome. I have, no one has, any sense as yet whether it’s possible. If not, and, if we cannot capture and use the energy of the quantum background (huge) even if only zero point, then we are ‘not going anywhere fast’.
    f) As such the only dimension we can likely ‘colonize’ is time. And in that sense, given relative time at mass and velocity (or even independent thereof) for all intents and purposes ‘dimensions’ (differeent rates of life histories) will be effectively infinite.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 22:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639386608016187393

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639333629477416961

  • NO MATH ISN’T UNREASONABLY EFFECTIVE Math = Logic of Ratios. Universal Laws = Ra

    NO MATH ISN’T UNREASONABLY EFFECTIVE
    Math = Logic of Ratios. Universal Laws = Ratios.
    Ergo the logic of ratios can describe the existential ratios. ie: math isn’t unreasonably effectve, it’s obviously effective, because it’s deterministic that it would be effective, because…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 23:16:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638681110057041922

  • If we say we need to disambiguate money by the time horizon of it’s use then tha

    If we say we need to disambiguate money by the time horizon of it’s use then that makes a lot of sense.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 01:50:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638357367338201088

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @ErikVoorhees @JeffSnider_AIP

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638345510049181697

  • For example, the rather obvious nature of what I just stated, vs the rather obvi

    For example, the rather obvious nature of what I just stated, vs the rather obvious ability to influence people with lower IQ by graphs of a single dimension that mislead them (easily). “Statistics, damned statistics” only applies to people who can’t manage multi-dimensional…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312924711190531

    Reply addressees: @ooooobelix

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299414505615363

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299973734400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.

    Reply addressees: @ooooobelix


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299843796992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668