Theme: Measurement

  • “Let me google that for you” Search google for ‘graph of race and IQ’. You will

    “Let me google that for you”
    Search google for ‘graph of race and IQ’.
    You will find a series of iffy but roughly correct normal distributions illustrating group differences. But you will not readily understand that this is a difference in class size. Or more specifically, MOSTLY a difference in the survivability of the underclasses in warmer climates, and the tendency of people with greater abilities to have fewer children.

    Reply addressees: @tryanph


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-31 14:10:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663910858810851328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663837545590050816

  • That’s an interesting observation, that’s half true. Let me explain why: Science

    That’s an interesting observation, that’s half true. Let me explain why: Science isn’t an ideology. It’s a system of testifying to observable, measurable, existence, for the purpose of discovering the first principles, where first principles can be used to falsify (test) any statement we make. An ideology is a means of avoiding the truth or consistency altogether, and instead creating emotions so that political activism can achieve an end under democratic governments. Philosophy is a means of doing the same by rational and often by sophistry. Theology is the same by reasonable and occult means.

    So, it’s not ‘pessimistic’ to rely on the truth. Instead. It prevents people from lying in order to engage in ideoology, philosopy, and theology, or pseudoscience for that matter, to avoid the truth.

    Now most of us don’t care if you pursue preferences, or goods, as long as you don’t pursue falsehoods or bads. And while you make excuse the ‘crime’ of pursuing falsehoods and bades (particularly if you’re female or have a feminine intuition and moral bias, or indoctrinated into feminine intuition and cognition by addition to the abrahamic religions, you’re still engaging in a crime. And like all criminals and addicts, justifying your criminality.

    Some petty crimes are tolerable if they sedate your neuroticism, but you don’t externalize them socially or politically. But if you do externalize them socially or politically, then it’s just a crime that we choose to prosecute or not.

    And degeneracy is what results from not prosecuting them. And that is our current condition.

    Irresponsible degeneracy. 😉

    Reply addressees: @AvrahamPetrovic


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 13:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663545433409613827

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663542863173668864

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rlmbMCcr0

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663524604474695680

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://t.co/TZmov6NxgD

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the period or movement.

    2) Confuses a) Fashion b) Craft and c) Art. Why? See #2.

    3) Obscures Dialectic/Pilpul (approval, plato) vs Truth (independent of approval, aristotle) Judaism > abrahamic religions combined with Plato > Hegel(Plato v2).
    |Hierarchy|: Personal Preference(personal) > Agreement between preferences(interpersonal) > Truth Independent of Preference or Agreement(political).

    4) Obscures the Economics of producer and consumer – that all we are seeing is an increase in wealth and a popularization of consumption and the relative abandonment of high art for aristocratic(wealth), noble(state), religious(social), signaling. ie: trifunctionalism: Religion(Social, Wants) <> Commercial(Trade, Supply) <> State (Politics, Limits)

    5) There is no high art today because art is a property of architecture – and we have none of merit. And the movie industry is a great attractor for talent and profit, so it’s more correct to say that the moving art has replaced the static art, just a mass media and social media have replaced pulpit and podium. In the performing arts, there are remnants of art in music in particular, somewhat less so in dance, less so in literature, less so in the play (including movies). Our participatory religion was an extension of the play – the original church of the indo europeans was the play (Tragedy). And it has lost all meaning.

    6) Simple version: art requires a natural aristocracy – and we have none. The common pepole consume increasing hedonism (simplicity).

    7) The decline in art was an intentional construction of the marxist revolution and the ‘march through the institutionals of cultural production’ by the series marxism(class relations), communism(private property, meritocracy), neomarxism(culture), postmodernism(truth,quality, judgement), feminism(family), libertarianism(commons), neoconservatism(political markets), woke(race marxism).

    They wrote down what they were going to do. They funded it. The persued it. They succeeded at the conversion of high trust homogeneous northern european high culture into middle eastern low trust authority-seeking, tribalism.

    It was done with malice and forethought. And they found a willing masses to follow them into the hills as did the pied piper.

    All art is propaganda. Whether personal, private, or public. It’s signaling.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663524604130762752

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://t.co/TZmov6NxgD

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the period or movement.

    2) Confuses a) Fashion b) Craft and c) Art. Why? See #2.

    3) Obscures Dialectic/Pilpul (approval, plato) vs Truth (independent of approval, aristotle) Judaism > abrahamic religions combined with Plato > Hegel(Plato v2).

    4) Obscures the Economics of producer and consumer – that all we are seeing is an increase in wealth and a popularization of consumption and the relative abandonment of high art for aristocratic(wealth), noble(state), religious(social), signaling.

    5) There is no high art today because art is a property of architecture – and we have none of merit. And the movie industry is a great attractor for talent and profit, so it’s more correct to say that the moving art has replaced the static art, just a mass media and social media have replaced pulpit and podium.

    6) Simple version: art requires aristocracy – and we have none. The common pepole consume increasing hedonism (simplicity).

    7) The decline in art was an intentional construction of the marxist revolution and the ‘march through the institutionals of cultural production’ by the series marxism(class relations), communism(private property, meritocracy), neomarxism(culture), postmodernism(truth,quality, judgement), feminism(family), libertarianism(commons), neoconservatism(political markets), woke(race marxism).

    They wrote down what they were going to do. They funded it. The persued it. They succeeded at the conversion of high trust homogeneous northern european high culture into middle eastern low trust authority-seeking, tribalism.

    It was done with malice and forethought. And they found a willing masses to follow them into the hills as did the pied piper.

    All art is propaganda. Whether personal, private, or public. It’s signaling.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:27:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663522426498449409

  • Again, saying so isn’t so. I do this for a living and I still don’t know where t

    Again, saying so isn’t so. I do this for a living and I still don’t know where those numbers are coming from. Especially since there are no official numbers that we know we can trust.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 16:17:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662130819232677893

    Reply addressees: @RayJPolitics1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662120937465028611

  • RT @JayMan471: It’s not just that. It’s about anything you can measure (except *

    RT @JayMan471: It’s not just that. It’s about anything you can measure (except *maybe* educational attainment–MAYBE). All of it shows zero…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 15:20:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662116476906610688

  • I don’t see where you’re getting those numbers. I don’t see that in the availabl

    I don’t see where you’re getting those numbers. I don’t see that in the available data. I might be wrong, and you have better data. But stating it isn’t demonstrating it. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 15:09:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662113696850608130

    Reply addressees: @RayJPolitics1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662110714104799232

  • Not sure where these numbers are from? AFAIK: GDP ~1.7T GDP per capita ~10k, and

    Not sure where these numbers are from?
    AFAIK:
    GDP ~1.7T
    GDP per capita ~10k, and by PPP ~27k.
    The rest looks about right.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 14:36:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662105494788403201

    Reply addressees: @RayJPolitics1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662097219149873157

  • Trade produces demand for writing and numbers. Proto writing on clay (primitive

    Trade produces demand for writing and numbers.
    Proto writing on clay (primitive accounting) was common even in the neolitic.
    Proto Writing evolved prior to the minoans or greeks in Old Europe.
    Writing may have independently developed in at least four ancient civilizations: Mesopotamia (between 3400 and 3100 BCE), Egypt (around 3250 BCE). China (1200 BCE),and lowland areas of Mesoamerica (by 500 BCE).
    The first systemic writing appears to have been in Uruk.
    The phonecians produced the efficient means of writing symbols for phonemes rather than pictographic syllables, words, or concepts. This provided the most utilitarian menthod with the least variation for the maximum precision in orders, contracts, inventory, and accounting.
    This technology spread fast – with late mover advantage (It’s harder to change existing systems like egyptian than to invent anew mesopotamian, greek, or etruscan)
    We still aren’t QUITE sure if Futhark evolved from greek, roman, or a combined origin.

    https://t.co/dPqpphq6AE

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina @superkanga


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 17:40:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660702220357124123

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660698789974294545