Theme: Measurement

  • I see, so now we understand why you didn’t grasp that ‘all mathematics is statis

    I see, so now we understand why you didn’t grasp that ‘all mathematics is statistical(continuous) and all computation is operational (discrete)’.

    So you’re thinking in nouns not verbs.

    Interesting.

    So now I see why eric is having a problem finding a protocol for speaking to you.

    I assume you haven’t studied economics, computation, and the limits of mathematical reducibility in both language, operations, economics, and physics. It’s because you’re talking about the behavior of mathematics, not the behavior of what we call reality (matter in motion), and so you’re operating from analogy and ideals rather than direct references. Bottom up vs top down.

    Ok. Getting closer now.

    Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 00:10:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697401596966039553

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697399833181708429

  • I am starting to see your problem. It will take me a bit more to put my finger o

    I am starting to see your problem. It will take me a bit more to put my finger on it with clarity.

    So far you’re using ideal (mathematics being idealism) concepts for optimization, equilibrium. This may be useful in some fields, even if it’s not consistent across fields.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 00:05:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697400350188204230

    Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697399252002222425

  • Sabine, all. Consiousness requires a system of measurement, and movement of the

    Sabine, all.
    Consiousness requires a system of measurement, and movement of the body through space and therefore human scale, is the source of the organization of information.
    I’ve done extensive work on the subject and as Sabine suggests, consciousness will emerge with enough memory in enough layers of recursive hierarchy from embodiment, episodic memory, and wayfinding – which is all that’s required. The next step is demand for recursion and that demand appears to be generated by the utility of social cooperation and the need for prediction of others behavior under the same constraints of embodiment. Truth: the brain turns it to be quite simple in function and complexity emergent simply by the sheer volume of grey matter.

    Reply addressees: @SocProf77 @skdh


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 17:43:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697304031348109312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697094392169844976

  • The work we do at the Natural Law Institute is very complex, tedious, and diffic

    The work we do at the Natural Law Institute is very complex, tedious, and difficult. And while our prose may seem a bit stilted and formal, that’s because it’s far closer to mathematics than to ordinary language. And that prose obscures the complexity of the work behind what we say. Because BEFORE we put all the effort into making our work accessible, it was obviously complex, tedious, difficult, and almost incomprehensible. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 17:40:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696940861517352961

  • The women are right by what measure. Men rated them in the opposite order by ‘fe

    The women are right by what measure.
    Men rated them in the opposite order by ‘femininity’.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 16:32:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696923852159304156

    Reply addressees: @iszie22

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696923497128247463

  • Eric, let me know if you want me to contribute here I haven’t been following thi

    Eric, let me know if you want me to contribute here I haven’t been following this thread and just caught on. My comment so far would be that math doesn’t map to reality that’s why it fails at the very small and at the vey complex. Math is just another language. It’s a very simple language with positional names, variations on one operator (addition/subtraction) and agreement on position (=<>). Worse mathematical reducibility is limited, while computational is not – at least independent of time. In lather words all mathematics is statistical, and continuous. Where the universe is discrete and occasionally manifests regularities that are mathematically reducible to expression in continuous terms. The failure of physics over the past fifty years is due to a failure to comprehend the limits of mathematics. The failure in economics is due to the limits of math. While n dimensional relations exist in semantics (current ai), they do not exist elsewhere.

    Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 12:22:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696860879906582528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696673486926983232

  • Algorithm: IQ axis – Iq of group. SNP axis: shared snp’s (variations within) the

    Algorithm: IQ axis – Iq of group.
    SNP axis: shared snp’s (variations within) the group.

    What is hard to understand cause I’m not getting it. But then it’s nearly 4:00 am and I’m a little late for getting some sleep. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 07:45:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696791272420171820

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696778288822415496

  • That’s simply not true on the evidence. Instead people need a system of understa

    That’s simply not true on the evidence. Instead people need a system of understanding and measurement that provides mindfulness and confidence that they can act in their interests and the group interest without provoking others by not imposing costs upon others. Now given the IQ distribution in different classes and polities, given the knowledge difference between young and ignorant, adult and educated, and late age experiences, and given the empathizing to systematizing spectrum of feminine to masculine cognition, this means that dim, ignorant and feminine are better served by anthropomorphic rules and the mature, educated, and masculine better served by laws of the universe, then there is some claim that we require the spectrum of fairy tales and myths, to literature and rational rules, to scientific knowledge of cause and consequence, such that we may incrementally gain competence and gracefully fail to given our different genetic abilities. But there is no evidence god or gods are useful or necessary compared to heroes and natural laws.

    Reply addressees: @BobHatchett


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 19:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696603299326091264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696600358296936897

  • We have known this for a very long time. But aggregates are misleading. Sexes pr

    We have known this for a very long time.
    But aggregates are misleading.
    Sexes process information very differently.
    We do not test for predictive ability.
    We dont test for cognitive bias, which matters more.
    The male distibution is wider, with zero women at the extreme.
    Everything meaningful occurs on the margin (male).
    I advocate for iq, personality, moral and bias testing – in particular the female overrepresentation in conflating tru/false with desirable/undesirable.

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You @BronskiJoseph


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-27 01:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695611212921245696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695608115188613439

  • Example: Disambiguation By Enumeration, Operationalization and Serialization: |M

    Example: Disambiguation By Enumeration, Operationalization and Serialization:

    |Motiviation for Imitation|: Jealousy > Envy > Imitation > Admiration > Inspiration > Aspiration

    Jealousy:
    Definition: Jealousy involves the fear of losing something valuable to another person, such as a relationship or affection.
    Focus: The focus of jealousy is often on the relationship between three parties: the one who is jealous, the person they are jealous of, and the object of affection or attention.
    Emotion: Often associated with feelings of insecurity, fear, or possessiveness.
    Example: Feeling jealous when a significant other spends time with someone else.

    Envy:
    Definition: Envy is the desire for something that someone else possesses, such as a trait, status, ability, or possession.
    Focus: The focus of envy is typically on the object or quality desired, not necessarily on the relationship with the person who has it.
    Emotion: Often associated with feelings of inadequacy, longing, or resentment.
    Example: Feeling envious of a colleague’s success or a friend’s new car.

    Comparison:
    Commonality: Both envy and jealousy involve a comparison between oneself and others and can lead to negative emotions.
    Difference: Envy is about wanting something someone else has, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else.

    Conclusion:
    Envy and jealousy, though related, are distinct emotions. Envy focuses on desiring something someone else has, while jealousy centers on the fear of losing something to someone else.

    Positive Equivalents Without Negative Connotations:
    Positive equivalents without negative connotations might include admiration for qualities or achievements and contentment and security in relationships. These positive counterparts emphasize appreciation, respect, and trust rather than longing, resentment, or fear.

    A term that might come closer to a positive equivalent of envy, encompassing both admiration and a desire to emulate, could be “admiration”, or “inspiration” or “aspiration.”

    Admiration: This can be seen as a positive counterpart to envy. Admiration involves respect and approval for someone’s qualities or achievements without the negative longing or resentment associated with envy.Example: Admiring a friend’s talent without wishing to take it away from them.

    Inspiration:
    Definition: Feeling motivated and energized by someone else’s qualities, achievements, or successes, leading to a desire to pursue similar goals or develop similar skills.
    Example: Being inspired by an artist’s creativity and seeking to develop one’s artistic talents.

    Aspiration:
    Definition: Having strong desires or ambitions to achieve something, often influenced by the admiration of others who have achieved similar goals.
    Example: Aspiring to become a writer after reading the works of a favorite author.

    Both inspiration and aspiration can capture the positive aspects of admiration and the desire to emulate without the negative connotations of longing or resentment that are often associated with envy. They reflect a proactive and constructive response to recognizing qualities or achievements in others that one wishes to cultivate in oneself.

    Neutral Equivalents:

    Imitation (Of behavior):
    Definition: The act of copying or mimicking someone else’s actions, behaviors, style, or work.
    Characteristics: Replicative, often involves direct copying without necessarily adding originality or personal interpretation.
    Example: Imitating a behavior by reproducing it as it appears.

    Comparison:
    Imitation vs. Envy: Imitation involves copying someone else’s work or behavior, while envy involves desiring something someone else has. Imitation is an action, whereas envy is a feeling or desire.
    Imitation vs. Jealousy: Imitation is about replication, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else. Imitation doesn’t necessarily involve relationships or emotions like jealousy does.
    Commonality with Envy: Both imitation and envy can involve a focus on someone else’s qualities or possessions, but imitation is about copying, while envy is about desiring.
    Difference from Jealousy: Jealousy is more complex and involves relationships and emotions that are not directly related to imitation.
    Inspiration vs. Imitation: Inspiration often leads to original creations that are influenced by another’s work but not directly copied. Imitation, on the other hand, involves direct copying or replication.
    Aspiration vs. Imitation: Aspiration is about setting and pursuing personal goals, often influenced by others but not necessarily involving copying. Imitation is more about replicating specific behaviors or works.
    Commonality: All concepts involve a relationship to others’ qualities, achievements, or works, but they differ in how that relationship is expressed and what it leads to.

    Conclusion:
    While inspiration and aspiration involve positive motivations and desires influenced by others, leading to personal growth, goals, or original creations, imitation is more about direct copying or mimicking. Inspiration and aspiration often involve adding personal interpretation, creativity, or ambition, while imitation may not necessarily include those elements. The choice between these concepts depends on the context and what aspect of the relationship to others’ qualities or works is being emphasized.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 15:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694002193534443521