Theme: Measurement

  • My Universe Scientific And Philosophical

    1 – Empiricist (scientist, naturalist) 2 – Operationalist (post-analytic[set] philosophy) 3 – Nomocratist (Rule of Law) 4 – Propertarian (Market Fascist) 5 – Monarchist (Judge of Last Resort) 6 – Pagan ( Universe, Nature, Ancestors, Nation, King[royal family] ) 7 – Ethnic Nationalist (Universal. For all peoples. Nations are markets that can fail.) ECONOMICS I view economic schools as class philosophies using various forms of pseudoscience. The underclasses need serfdom, the lower classes need socialism(managed labor), the middle classes need markets, the R&D people need subsidy, and the aristocratic people need to create socialism, markets, and rule of law that make both possible. These are just facts. Austrian economics = Jewish economics (favoring the lender at everyone’s expense.). Chicago economics = anglo rule of law economic (favoring the entrepreneur.) Possibly the best solution. Keynesian Economics = Marxism v2, favoring the laborer and consumer at the expense of the society and civilization. Everything else isn’t economics. The only economics consists of rule of law, and supply of institutions that serve the necessities of the demographic. IDEOLOGICAL (POLITICAL) 1 – Conservative (Aristocracy – Meritocracy. Tripartism.) 2 – Tripartarian (Inequality. The natural hierarchy of the prisoner/slave/serf, laboring/commercial/financial, legal/military, and scientific/philosophical classes.) 3 – Reactionary (Anti-Abrahamist. Every one of the enlightenment programs has failed in social science and politics, and has succeeded only in replacing the Abrahamic superstition, with Abrahamic Psuedo-science, and Institutionalized lying by gossip.)
  • “Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is suf

    —“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 20:21:00 UTC

  • “Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is suf

    —“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank
  • “Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is suf

    —“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank
  • Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always

    Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always only whether we preserve constant relations or not.

    Even so, cognitive complexity requires constant relations (commensurability).

    How does the mind achieve commensurability with existential reality?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 15:07:00 UTC

  • Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always

    Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always only whether we preserve constant relations or not. Even so, cognitive complexity requires constant relations (commensurability). How does the mind achieve commensurability with existential reality?
  • Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always

    Deducibility is only possible across constant relations. The question is always only whether we preserve constant relations or not. Even so, cognitive complexity requires constant relations (commensurability). How does the mind achieve commensurability with existential reality?
  • Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,

    Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:48:00 UTC

  • Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,

    Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names.
  • Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,

    Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names.