Theme: Measurement
-
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”—
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”— (Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply) That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated. You know, I have been working on this problem only since about 2001, and I know that Russo-Ukrainian Libertarianism was abandoned by intellectuals relatively quickly, but it’s still surprising that these nonsense arguments still persist. Mises was irrelevant. Rothbard was wrong. Hoppe took rothbard and restated it in the justificationary nonsense of Kant and the Marxists.But we’ve left behind justificationism along with it’s source – scripture. Science is exclusively falsifications: Darwinian.The real insights of Mises, Rothbard,and Hoppe are obscured.. …by pseudoscientific propaganda. We solve social science in a century when no one else did: Mises discovered operationalism in economics, rothbard and hoppe reduced all social science to reciprocity (property), and it is possible to construct a formal logic of LAW. Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right. -
“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”—
(Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply)
That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated.
You know, I have been working on this problem only since about 2001, and I know that Russo-Ukrainian Libertarianism was abandoned by intellectuals relatively quickly, but it’s still surprising that these nonsense arguments still persist. Mises was irrelevant. Rothbard was wrong.
Hoppe took rothbard and restated it in the justificationary nonsense of Kant and the Marxists.But we’ve left behind justificationism along with it’s source – scripture. Science is exclusively falsifications: Darwinian.The real insights of Mises, Rothbard,and Hoppe are obscured..
…by pseudoscientific propaganda. We solve social science in a century when no one else did: Mises discovered operationalism in economics, rothbard and hoppe reduced all social science to reciprocity (property), and it is possible to construct a formal logic of LAW.
Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 10:41:00 UTC
-
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”—
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”— (Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply) That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated. You know, I have been working on this problem only since about 2001, and I know that Russo-Ukrainian Libertarianism was abandoned by intellectuals relatively quickly, but it’s still surprising that these nonsense arguments still persist. Mises was irrelevant. Rothbard was wrong. Hoppe took rothbard and restated it in the justificationary nonsense of Kant and the Marxists.But we’ve left behind justificationism along with it’s source – scripture. Science is exclusively falsifications: Darwinian.The real insights of Mises, Rothbard,and Hoppe are obscured.. …by pseudoscientific propaganda. We solve social science in a century when no one else did: Mises discovered operationalism in economics, rothbard and hoppe reduced all social science to reciprocity (property), and it is possible to construct a formal logic of LAW. Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right. -
5 – In all things, Mises was only half right, which is the problem we fall into
5 – In all things, Mises was only half right, which is the problem we fall into whenever we cherry pick what we measure. Hayek started with cognition, and worked through economics, and finally understood behavioral capital was created by TORT LAW, and all else was a consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 00:06:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974799032559325185
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
I’m rather shocked at how many fundamental mistakes @BobMurphyEcon makes in this article on Hayek, knowledge, Mises, and calculation. Stunned actually. https://t.co/rn3JZED9pi
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
-
If An Iq Test Was Embedded Within A Popular And Highly-addictive Video Game, Would The Players Develop The Ability To Score Extremely Well On Iq Tests?
No. All tests are renormalized regularly to compensate for adaptive effects and therefore to preserve the distribution. It is a very precise science.
https://www.quora.com/If-an-IQ-test-was-embedded-within-a-popular-and-highly-addictive-video-game-would-the-players-develop-the-ability-to-score-extremely-well-on-IQ-tests
-
If An Iq Test Was Embedded Within A Popular And Highly-addictive Video Game, Would The Players Develop The Ability To Score Extremely Well On Iq Tests?
No. All tests are renormalized regularly to compensate for adaptive effects and therefore to preserve the distribution. It is a very precise science.
https://www.quora.com/If-an-IQ-test-was-embedded-within-a-popular-and-highly-addictive-video-game-would-the-players-develop-the-ability-to-score-extremely-well-on-IQ-tests
-
4 – Hayek was among the first to change the category of analysis from the physic
4 – Hayek was among the first to change the category of analysis from the physical to information -which is how all sciences function today. Mises was the first to discover economic operationalism but he understood math and science too poorly to understand what he’d done.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 23:58:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974797029288398849
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
I’m rather shocked at how many fundamental mistakes @BobMurphyEcon makes in this article on Hayek, knowledge, Mises, and calculation. Stunned actually. https://t.co/rn3JZED9pi
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
-
Just to support T.H.S. : 1- Mises always and everywhere only addresses commoditi
Just to support T.H.S. : 1- Mises always and everywhere only addresses commodities (cherry picking) and never addresses the rest of the capital stack which makes commodity trade possible – particularly tacit knowledge capital (all paradigms). Hayek’s Serfdom includes ALL capital.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 23:46:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974793941877972993
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
I’m rather shocked at how many fundamental mistakes @BobMurphyEcon makes in this article on Hayek, knowledge, Mises, and calculation. Stunned actually. https://t.co/rn3JZED9pi
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
-
That’s pretty ridiculous right? “Gravity exists, we are not yet sure why gravity
That’s pretty ridiculous right? “Gravity exists, we are not yet sure why gravity exists.” was a question for all human history. So, we know because we can measure people’s demonstrated (vs reported) behavior. Usually (a) familial/tribalism, (b) lack of rule of law, (c) poverty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 12:10:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974256587492773890
Reply addressees: @THEESILVERTHORN @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson @sonshi_com
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974238891627696129
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974238891627696129
-
he doesn’t ignore it. but then again, the data is the same on entry an exit so i
he doesn’t ignore it. but then again, the data is the same on entry an exit so it cant be bias that causes it. there would have to higher dropout rates for women rater than th other way around. coeducation is great for women but bad for men. wo competition men have no incentive.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 02:19:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107902209294338
Reply addressees: @WebPaigee @leo_charlton
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107018335223810
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107018335223810