Description (testimony) differs from Story (fiction) as does Measurement from General rule.
Theme: Measurement
-
Description (testimony) differs from Story (fiction) as does Measurement from Ge
Description (testimony) differs from Story (fiction) as does Measurement from General rule. -
DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN? 1) Money(commodity) vs Money Substitutes (instruments) 2
DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN?
1) Money(commodity) vs Money Substitutes (instruments)
2) Law (Reciprocity) vs Law Substitutes (legislation/command)
3) History(description) vs History Substitutes (wisdom lit)
4) Description(measurements) vs Description Substitutes (narrative)
5) Deflationary (logical) vs inflationary (fictional)
6) Truth (Survival) vs Truth Substitutes (Justification)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 11:38:00 UTC
-
Do You See The Pattern?
1) Money(commodity) vs Money Substitutes (instruments) 2) Law (Reciprocity) vs Law Substitutes (legislation/command) 3) History(description) vs History Substitutes (wisdom lit) 4) Description(measurements) vs Description Substitutes (narrative) 5) Deflationary (logical) vs inflationary (fictional) 6) Truth (Survival) vs Truth Substitutes (Justification) -
Do You See The Pattern?
1) Money(commodity) vs Money Substitutes (instruments) 2) Law (Reciprocity) vs Law Substitutes (legislation/command) 3) History(description) vs History Substitutes (wisdom lit) 4) Description(measurements) vs Description Substitutes (narrative) 5) Deflationary (logical) vs inflationary (fictional) 6) Truth (Survival) vs Truth Substitutes (Justification) -
It’s not a point of view. It’s a set of measurements, and it’s included generall
It’s not a point of view. It’s a set of measurements, and it’s included generally in the field of political economy in the studies of bureaucracies, corruption, rule of law, trust, credit extensions, economic velocity, growth, purchasing power and equity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 01:00:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975174975584964608
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975158381672566784
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
@curtdoolittle Well its a POV. Not much more than #BenFranklin said re small countries becoming corrupt & big ones becoming tyrannies.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975158381672566784
-
There is no unity unless you can measure it. The only unity that matters is the
There is no unity unless you can measure it. The only unity that matters is the minimum organized violence to alter the status quo.There is no we. There is no advantage to political order if an alternative order is more preferential.Violence determines all.The rest is just cost.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 00:28:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975167019514515456
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975158769838706688
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
@curtdoolittle So cultural unity counts. Sure.
How would one calculate any such “optimum”? What are the factors that change with tech or economy or faith diversity?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975158769838706688
-
How Does The Level Of Genetic Similarity Compare Between Human Races And Between Dog Breeds?
This is a question that demonstrates a misunderstanding of the function of genes.
You can’t measure genetic distance by comparison of the genome but by comparison of the consequences produced by the combinations of genes over time.
In other words a single change may cause a disease, a small number of changes may produce profound consequences (such as variation in testosterone), and many many changes may cancel each other out, or must be required to operate in sequence to produce visible consequences (intelligence).
Humans are ‘grown’ not ‘manufactured’. Most of our variation occurs during the process of growth in utero in particular, then as we mature. Most variations occur because of different rates of growth and inhibitors.
Humans sort by visible and perceptible value to one another. Most of the time by reproductive and associative fitness. Hence low rotation of the classes.
Our classes and castes are equivalent to various dog breeds.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-level-of-genetic-similarity-compare-between-human-races-and-between-dog-breeds
-
How Does The Level Of Genetic Similarity Compare Between Human Races And Between Dog Breeds?
This is a question that demonstrates a misunderstanding of the function of genes.
You can’t measure genetic distance by comparison of the genome but by comparison of the consequences produced by the combinations of genes over time.
In other words a single change may cause a disease, a small number of changes may produce profound consequences (such as variation in testosterone), and many many changes may cancel each other out, or must be required to operate in sequence to produce visible consequences (intelligence).
Humans are ‘grown’ not ‘manufactured’. Most of our variation occurs during the process of growth in utero in particular, then as we mature. Most variations occur because of different rates of growth and inhibitors.
Humans sort by visible and perceptible value to one another. Most of the time by reproductive and associative fitness. Hence low rotation of the classes.
Our classes and castes are equivalent to various dog breeds.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-level-of-genetic-similarity-compare-between-human-races-and-between-dog-breeds
-
(Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply) That’s f
(Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply) That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:31:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975016778156920832
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974794304769200134
IN REPLY TO:
@BobMurphyEcon
@curtdoolittle @FriedrichHayek What are you talking about? Mises talks e.g. about building a railroad connecting two points, and how the planner can’t know which route is most economical.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974794304769200134