Problem is that only a moron that is entirely ignorant of both probability (“ludic fallacy”) and economics (“risk measurement”) would be ignorant and stupid enough to conflate closed (ludic) and unclosed (risk) measures. Odds can be calculated, but risk only PRICED. Left=Idiot
Chris Wallace, winning:
WALLACE: What are the odds? One in a hundred? What–What?
TRUMP: I don’t do odds, I gave very detailed–
WALLACE: You ran a casino sir.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46479393_10156787026407264_8744695719807418368_o_10156787026397264.jpg CHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS
You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.Eric DykstraI find it hard to decipher when someone is pandering to morons versus when they just are a moron.Nov 18, 2018, 12:08 PMSteve PenderI’ve hated him for a long time. Classic case of media nepotism through his dad Mike.Nov 18, 2018, 12:23 PMJennifer DeanSameNov 18, 2018, 12:38 PMCurt DoolittleMike Wallace (Wallik)
—“Wallace, whose family’s surname was originally Wallik,[2] was born on May 9, 1918, in Brookline, Massachusetts,[2] to Russian Jewish immigrant parents,[2][3] He identified as a Jew throughout his life”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:14 PMCurt DoolittleChris Wallace
—“Wallace was born in Chicago, Illinois,[2] the son of longtime CBS 60 Minutes reporter Mike Wallace and Norma Kaphan.[4] Wallace is Jewish[5] and both his parents were Jewish.[6][7] His parents divorced when he was one year old. He grew up in a home with his mother and his stepfather, former CBS News President Bill Leonard.[8] He did not develop a relationship with his biological father until the age of 14.[9] Leonard gave him early exposure to political journalism, hiring him as an assistant to Walter Cronkite at the 1964 Republican National Convention.”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:15 PMAndrea RoyallImagine being so pathetically “jewish” that you have to steal a Scottish surname to hide your “Jewishness”.Nov 18, 2018, 1:17 PMAndrew ClaytonAndrea Royall “I didn’t steal it, goy. My Name was always Wallace.
Help! Police! This Wallik guy is trying to steal my name!”
*rubs hands*Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMAndrea Royallyou forgot the shekels 😉Nov 18, 2018, 2:27 PMAlex Macleodhttps://youtu.be/eB8K1jPBnwc?t=11Nov 18, 2018, 5:58 PMKarl KühlschrankName was changed from Myron Wallik to Mike Wallace.Nov 18, 2018, 8:11 PMJim LeisAnd is it just me, or has he grown sillier as he gets older? Or maybe it’s just a journalistic sign of the times.Nov 18, 2018, 10:34 PMRichard HallCould I get an example of a probability in a closed system and a priced risk in an open system?
I don’t understand why they aren’t interchangeable.Nov 19, 2018, 3:30 PMCurt Doolittledice, roulette wheel, cards, vs stock market vs an economy.Nov 19, 2018, 4:23 PMCurt Doolittlesee ludic fallacy by talebNov 19, 2018, 4:24 PMMichael AndradeWe’re reaching levels of of course that shouldn’t be possible.Nov 19, 2018, 11:14 PMRichard HallAh I see now. Thank you.Nov 20, 2018, 3:15 PMCHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS
You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_5118172295960985600_o_10156787024737264.jpg USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES
—“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq
(referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)
One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.
Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.
-hugs brother.Skye StewartThe left tests the limits capital accumulation
The right tests the limits of capital outlayNov 18, 2018, 12:09 PMCurt Doolittleooh… quotable… well done.Nov 18, 2018, 12:29 PMBryan Nova BreySkye Stewart What does the Federal Reserve test?Nov 18, 2018, 12:48 PMMichael D. AbbottYes. id = infantile. ego = maternal. super egp = paternal. I know you don’t subscribe to these terms–but it’s a similar idea.Nov 18, 2018, 12:55 PMSkye StewartBryan Nova Brey patience?Nov 18, 2018, 1:05 PMKari Anne DorstadI don’t see myself as a women that tests the limit of Men ! It’s not my nature to do that !Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMMichael D. AbbottGood women encourage men to test each other, while remaining encouraging.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMMichael D. AbbottBut the female shadow tests men to the core.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMCurt Doolittle^really? Or are you imagining that? What do women really do? they continuously sh-t test, in every culture. Women undermine men constantly through nagging and endless seeking of acquisitions….
Good women are in place because bad women are prevented, but that doesn’t mean women are naturally good, any more than men are naturally good. Men and women are naturally pragmatic, and we use violence and threats to force them gradually out of bad and into surviving by the good. which is quite expensive and difficult.Nov 18, 2018, 3:26 PMUSING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES
—“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq
(referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)
One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.
Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.
Polysyllables. Pah’-lee-sill’-uh-bulls. And long chains of reasoning, fully accounting for costs.
Approval, Disapproval, and Moralizing don’t take polysyllables and long chains of reasoning fully accounting for costs. It’s your reaction to being called out for having tried to escape payments of costs in exchange for gains.
—“Basically in layman’s terms: There are infinite frames of references (paradigms). We can choose an arbitrary frame of reference within some set of paradigms, or we can use the OPERATIONAL frame of reference consisting of fully commensurable terms, or the mathematical frame of that same reference, that allows us to speak in a standardized format, such that we can discuss across domains and disciplines”—Yiannis Kontinopoulos
you cannot learn anything at from verbalism(meaning), only operations (actions). startat the beginning. its a long journey to understanding. https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/
@curtdoolittle Sounds like an interesting conversation was had. I have a question regarding a concept I was mulling over yesterday: Would it be right to separate the term “Law” and “Rules”, to strengthen both in terms and use?
Karl Popper created (from aristotle, weber, and pareto) the method of analytic philosophy I make use of, which includes Definitions, Series, Lists, Tables, and parentheticals. He used italics a lot but italics aren’t available or I would us Italics where I use Initial Capitals to denote the name of a definition in a series I have defined elsewhere.
