Theme: Measurement

  • It’s not a preference but a measure. In all my work I for decidability and full

    It’s not a preference but a measure. In all my work I for decidability and full accounting. This is the only expression of decidability and full accounting that is NOT preference. As such, yes he’s silly, no I’m not expressing a preference. And yes I could easily anticipate your…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-16 19:00:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813287611722833953

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813286965032415454

  • (NLI CORE) THE CRITERIA FOR A TRUTH CLAIM Truth – In the Context of a Truth Clai

    (NLI CORE)
    THE CRITERIA FOR A TRUTH CLAIM
    Truth – In the Context of a Truth Claim, Truth consists of the promise of testimony of infallibility that has survived sufficient due diligence to promise the evasion of the imposition of involuntary costs upon any form of capital (demonstrated interest) from the temporal, to informational to normative, to institutional, to material, for the self or others. (promissory, performative, warrantied(due diligence), satisfying demand for infallibility that would impose involuntary costs upon the demonstrated interests of one’s self or others in the context in question.)
    Therefore Consisting of Demand for:
    – Infallibility – A decision upon which the resulting display word and deed impose no involuntary costs upon the demonstrated interests of one’s self or others in the context in question.
    – Decidability – Sufficient information exists, and no other information is required, such that alternatives are sufficiently improbable to impossible to satisfy the demand for infallibility in the context in question.
    Consisting of:
    – Truthfulness – Testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context in question (Tautological, Ideal, Logical, Testifiable, Demonstrated, Honest, Explanatory, Analogical.)
    Consisting of:
    – Testifiability – The limited list of dimensions to which humans are capable of testifying, and if satisfied, constitute the possibility of a truth claim.
    Consisting of Satisfying demand for:
    – – Realism – All existence consists of the persistence of constant relations between states of energy, independent of human perception, mind, belief, or preference, yet categorizable by human sense and perception, into entities(references, states, nouns), categories, processes(verbs), and consequences (state changes, nouns).
    – – Naturalism – All phenomena within existence have natural causes that can be observed, measured, described, understood as consistent and coherent with all other phenomena, and reduced to irreducible causes (first principles), using sense, perception, and logical and physical instrumentation.
    Consisting of Satisfying demand for:
    – – – Materialism (Persistence): Reality consists of physical or material entities that persist over time.
    – – – Determinism (Lawfulness): Existence operates according to consistent laws and regularities that can be discovered and described by science.
    – – – Reductionism (Reducibility): Complex phenomena can be explained by reducing them to their simpler, more fundamental components and processes.
    – – – Opportunism (Emergence): The interaction of simple elements can lead to the emergence of complex systems and opportunities for combination, recombination, innovation, adaptation, and evolution.
    – – – Scarcity (Constraint): All existence consists of limited availability of resources, which drives competition, adaptation, and evolution, influencing the behavior and interaction of organisms, shaping life and ecosystems through constraints.
    – – – Continuity (Consistency): There exists continuity between humans and the rest of the natural world, with all entities and phenomena being subject to the same natural laws and principles.
    AND
    Satisfying demand for:
    – – Identity – Categorically Consistent
    – – Logical – Internally Consistent
    – – Empirical – Externally Correspondent
    – – Possible – Operationally Possible
    – – Rational – Subjectively Rational (Bounded Rationality)
    – – Reciprocal – Reciprocally Subjectively Rational
    AND
    – – Fully accounted
    – – Within Stated Limits
    – – Within the limits of warrantability
    – – Within the limits of liability
    This is all it is possible for humans to testify to.
    If one cannot testify to these criteria then one cannot promise a truth claim.
    The reason this took millennia to solve was because it was, in fact, a very hard problem.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:24:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812644425874419712

  • It’s a simple measurement. Sorry. Don’t blame me. Blame the statisticians

    It’s a simple measurement. Sorry. Don’t blame me. Blame the statisticians.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 03:00:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811234137807659402

    Reply addressees: @a7959705360789 @spaceangelvoice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811233921612361821

  • All; What is the difference between rational philosophy, empirical argument, jud

    All;
    What is the difference between rational philosophy, empirical argument, judicial competition, and formal decidability?

    (Clue: what dimensions are permissible in each paradigm, and what criteria of decidability)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 12:42:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810293289658003710

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810125322450301280


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY ‘PHILOSOPHER”?
    One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1810125322450301280

  • All; What is the difference between rational philosophy, empirical argument, jud

    All;
    What is the difference between rational philosophy, empirical argument, judicial competition, and formal decidability?

    (Clue: what dimensions are permissible in each paradigm, and what criteria of decidability)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 12:42:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810293289603493888

  • Well done. Minor improvement: A theory consists of (a) a narrative explanation o

    Well done.
    Minor improvement: A theory consists of (a) a narrative explanation of the causes of (b) a set of observable, measurable, behaviors (state and changes in state). I usually describe this as the two sides of the coin: positiva (narrative) vs negativa (measurements).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-03 22:00:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808621849074442396

    Reply addressees: @FredSondheim @theseoblogger @meharmsen @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808603922552271278

  • You don’t know this, but as far as I know I’m the leading theorist in overcoming

    You don’t know this, but as far as I know I’m the leading theorist in overcoming the failure of philosophers to define science and the scientific method – by defining it and explaining it. I’ve never seen anyone both understand my work and disagree: science consists of the process of producing testimony that incrementally discovers first principles (causality).

    Some people ( and I understand them) are raised in a religious tradition, and maintain the moral intuitions they were indoctrinated into, while granting superiority to the evidence of causality (realism and naturalism) find no conflict between those moral rules and natural laws.

    Conversely, I can quite easily explain why you err in your obsessions. And why all those like you require a childish need for certainty that you can ascertain, instead of maturing into an adult need for actionability while maintaining both humility, skepticism, and optimism that one’s konwledge will improve.

    You demonstrate neigher humility, nor skepticism, nor optimism despite the evidence that the method of producing testimony that europeans developed in court in matters of dispute and extended to all experience outside of court – which we call ‘science’ – has reduced your supernatural lies to mere children’s parables.

    Reply addressees: @Schwall_ins_All @therealbaldtim @sbrandmusic @meharmsen @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-02 15:59:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808168563925979136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808162806870458802

  • RT @WerrellBradley: @Gentilenewsnet At The Natural Law Institute, we talk about

    RT @WerrellBradley: @Gentilenewsnet At The Natural Law Institute, we talk about “Coherence” being the relationship of some signal to base r…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-01 19:27:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807858475953016972

  • Interesting. Kate would you say male or female antisocial behavior is expanding

    Interesting.
    Kate would you say male or female antisocial behavior is expanding and how would you measure it?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-01 01:49:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807592411587109320

    Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807506933139833262

  • The problem is the difference between describing mathematical measurements (inst

    The problem is the difference between describing mathematical measurements (instruments) and describing the existential phenomena (reality). Physics has been increasingly lost since einstein and bohr re-platonized mathematical physics – undoing the cartesian revolution., 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-22 19:41:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804600593081925852

    Reply addressees: @josh61597760 @matterasmachine @pmddomingos

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1804459566287004009