Theme: Measurement

  • Invert the question, if math is just another grammar, and all grammars adhere to

    Invert the question, if math is just another grammar, and all grammars adhere to the universal grammar (language), then the unification of the grammars is possible if we universalize that grammar by reforming each discipline into one universal logic of universal commensurability. If so, then why should the mathematicians any more than the scientists of philosophers base their foundations on that which is false and produces externalities? So in other words, what does math as it is practiced have to do with everything else?

    (And yes I realize that this is a subject that is difficult to grasp without rather exhaustive studying the consequences of ‘bad math’. I mean, Descartes restores the european tradition and Einstein and Bohr devolve it again? That’s only possible because the foundations are sets rather than grammars.)

    Reply addressees: @matterasmachine @Plinz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 14:59:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818300298512760833

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818281708745363818

  • Joscha: Still thinking about this. (a) Yes it’s more intuitive to think in spati

    Joscha: Still thinking about this.
    (a) Yes it’s more intuitive to think in spatial terms, and (b) yes it’s more burdensome to think in verbal(algebraic) terms
    (c) But optimally, once a model is sufficiently complex, we would like to visualize in spatial terms and describe in algebraic terms.
    (d) Most of what’s wrong in physics we can blame on confusing einstein and bohr. Einstein worked from mental imagery the expressed in mathematical terms – even if he had to invent a nonsense-concept like space-time as a variable. Bohr on the other hand, just gave up on models altogether. So we have two founders of present physics who, making two different errors precisely because they pursued the verbal rather than spatial in some aspect of their work, created generations of chaos among well meaning fools who did not grasp the foundations of mathematics or understand itt derived from computation.

    Reply addressees: @Plinz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 14:26:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818292086698917888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818022862302925090

  • CC: @Plinz Simple example of our work on mathematics

    CC: @Plinz
    Simple example of our work on mathematics. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1818286569356173761

  • CORRECTING THE ARCHAIC IN MATHEMATICS: WHAT’S AN ALGEBRA? An Algebra consists of

    CORRECTING THE ARCHAIC IN MATHEMATICS: WHAT’S AN ALGEBRA?

    An Algebra consists of a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation), vocabulary (references) and logic (comparisons) of a paradigm (set of permissible dimensions) reducible to positional names, their relations, and operations on those positions and relations.

    In other words, mathematics is a reductive langauge reduced to positional names, relations, and operations that produces reduces ambiguity to near impossibility. It’s just Nouns(Names), Verbs(Names of Operations), and Agreements (Comparisons). Just like ordinary language.

    Explanation by ChatGPT
    This description captures the essence of an algebraic structure quite effectively, aligning it with the metaphorical language of grammar, vocabulary, and logic.

    Let’s refine and expand on this conceptualization:

    Components of an Algebra in Mathematical Terms

    1. Grammar (Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation):
    – Operations: In an algebra, the operations define how elements of the set interact with each other. These operations follow specific rules or axioms that ensure consistency and allow for the recursive application of these operations. For example, in a group, the operation might be addition or multiplication, which must satisfy properties like associativity and the existence of an identity element.
    – Axioms: These are foundational rules that must hold for all elements and operations within the algebraic structure. They serve to disambiguate operations and ensure the internal consistency of the system.

    2. Vocabulary (References):
    – Elements of the Set: The set in an algebra contains elements that serve as the “vocabulary.” These are the basic units or objects on which operations are performed. In a vector space, for instance, these elements are vectors.
    – Scalars (in some algebras): In algebras like vector spaces, scalars from an associated field (like real numbers) are also part of the vocabulary, used in operations like scalar multiplication. (A scalar is just another positional name.)

    3. Logic (Comparisons):
    – Relational Structures: Logic in an algebra involves the comparison and relation of elements. This includes understanding equivalence relations, ordering, and other relational properties that define how elements compare with one another.
    – Identity and Inverses: Logic also encompasses the existence of identity elements and inverses, which are crucial for defining the structure and behavior of the algebraic system.

    4. Paradigm (Set of Permissible Dimensions):
    – Dimensionality: The paradigm refers to the set of permissible dimensions or the framework within which the algebra operates. In vector spaces, this refers to the dimensionality defined by the number of independent vectors. In more abstract algebras, it might refer to the number of independent operations or the nature of the elements themselves.
    – Positional Names and Relations: The elements can often be represented in terms of positions (such as coordinates in a vector space) and their relations to each other (such as linear dependence or orthogonality in vector spaces).

    Summary
    In summary, an algebra consists of:
    – Grammar: The rules (operations and axioms) that govern the system.
    – Vocabulary: The set of elements (and possibly scalars) involved.
    – Logic: The relational structures and logical properties, including identity elements and comparisons.
    – Paradigm: The set of permissible dimensions and the framework for positions and relations.

    This description emphasizes the structured nature of algebras and their capacity to systematically describe and manipulate elements according to specific rules and operations. This understanding applies across various types of algebras, from simple structures like groups and rings to more complex ones like vector spaces and fields.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 14:04:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818286569049964544

  • IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH MATH? 1) A great deal is wrong with math in the sense tha

    IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH MATH?
    1) A great deal is wrong with math in the sense that the externalities produced by the framework of of its evolution are vast and negatively consequential.

    2) Yes. You are correct that matter is discrete (operational, computational) and physics is continuous (statistical, calculative), and the failure of this comprehension has led to founding mathematics on sets instead of operations.

    3) In economics we are painfully aware of the limits of mathematics and we account for those limits even if most economists use the wrong calculus in their calculations. In physics they are more likely to use the correct calculus but not understand the limits of mathematics. In mathematics all to often they use platonic forms and create and export nonsense ideas to justify what would be perfectly rational if explained operationally (for example the square of negative one).

    So the claim from mathematicians that ‘it works and we don’t want to reform’ is the same reason philosophy died by the 1970s.

    CD

    Reply addressees: @matterasmachine @Plinz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 13:37:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818279818372222976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817993361699098667

  • RT @MichaelSurrago: @skdh @curtdoolittle Meanwhile the “iconic math” of William

    RT @MichaelSurrago: @skdh @curtdoolittle Meanwhile the “iconic math” of William Bricken remains unknown (math that looks like what it repre…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 02:54:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818118032587182322

  • RT @TyrantsMuse: I took common risks for the lifetimes of US men born every year

    RT @TyrantsMuse: I took common risks for the lifetimes of US men born every year and I ran them through a simple impact pipeline to measure…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-27 22:05:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817320356027244898

  • QUICK GLANCE TABLE OF US RATES Birth Rate: . . . . . . . . . . 110.00 per 10,000

    QUICK GLANCE TABLE OF US RATES
    Birth Rate: . . . . . . . . . . 110.00 per 10,000 people
    … Citizen Rate:. . . . . . . 100-120 per 10,000
    … Immigrant Rate:. . . . 150-200 per 10,000
    Poverty Rate:. . . . . . . . .1,140 per 10,000 people
    … White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8%: . .820 per 10,000
    … Asian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10%: 1,010 per 10,000
    … Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . 17%: 1,700 per 10,000
    … Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%: 1,950 per 10,000
    … Amerindian . . . . . . . . . 23%: 2,300 per 10,000
    Middle Class . . . . . . . . .5,000 per 10,000 people
    Upper Middle Class:. . 1,400 per 10,000 people
    Upper Class . . . . . . . . . . 500 per 10,000 people
    Immigration Rate: . . . . .4.50 per 10,000 people
    Murderer Rate:. . . . . . . . 0.69 per 10,000 people
    … White . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.316 per 10,000 people
    … Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.862 per 10,000 people
    Overdose Rate: . . . . . . . 2.83 per 10,000 people
    Accidental Death Rate: 4.94 per 10,000 people
    Non Accidental Deaths: 8.21 per 10,000 people


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-27 21:33:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817312260286734336

  • Quick Glance Table of US Table of Rates Birth Rate: . . . . . . . . . . 110.00 p

    Quick Glance Table of US Table of Rates
    Birth Rate: . . . . . . . . . . 110.00 per 10,000 people
    … Citizen Rate:. . . . . . . 100-120 per 10,000
    … Immigrant Rate:. . . . 150-200 per 10,000
    Poverty Rate:. . . . . . . . .1,140 per 10,000 people
    … White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8%: . .820 per 10,000
    … Asian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10%: 1,010 per 10,000
    … Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . 17%: 1,700 per 10,000
    … Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%: 1,950 per 10,000
    … Amerindian . . . . . . . . . 23%: 2,300 per 10,000
    Middle Class . . . . . . . . .5,000 per 10,000 people
    Upper Middle Class:. . 1,400 per 10,000 people
    Upper Class . . . . . . . . . . 500 per 10,000 people
    Immigration Rate: . . . . .4.50 per 10,000 people
    Murderer Rate:. . . . . . . . 0.69 per 10,000 people
    … White . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.316 per 10,000 people
    … Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.862 per 10,000 people
    Overdose Rate: . . . . . . . 2.83 per 10,000 people
    Accidental Death Rate: 4.94 per 10,000 people
    Non Accidental Deaths: 8.21 per 10,000 people


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-27 21:33:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817309876684546048

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: PRECISION, EXACTION, & EXECUTION We’re on the naming names nar

    RT @ThruTheHayes: PRECISION, EXACTION, & EXECUTION

    We’re on the naming names narrow path.

    Equilibrative restitution is a calculable pheno…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-26 15:04:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816852211609035130