Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • As far as I know all words are names, and all names are measurements, and all st

    As far as I know all words are names, and all names are measurements, and all strings of names (phrases, sentences, paragraphs, descriptions, narratives) are collections of measurements that either balance or they don’t. (consistent, correspondent, operational and coherent)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:12:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173706151533391872

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173705655414403072

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue Give me an example. Language, like violence can be used for true and reciprocal or false and irreciprocal ends. It is just a resource. So while I work on eliminating falsehood by law I am not sure what you are working on other than association, which is useless for operations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173705655414403072

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue Give me an example. Language, like violence can be used for true and reciprocal or false and irreciprocal ends. It is just a resource. So while I work on eliminating falsehood by law I am not sure what you are working on other than association, which is useless for operations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173705655414403072

  • So I would have to understand WHY you’re trying to do what you’re doing. To undr

    So I would have to understand WHY you’re trying to do what you’re doing. To undrestand why your approach suits it. Most people want discounted references by increasing homogeneity of narratives required for symbolism to provide discounts on cognition and trust extension.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173703101716606977

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue Again, the purpose of speech is increase in disambiguation at cost of education whereas purpose of signs is broad association at cost of ambiguation. Active attempt by (((left))) to destroy western symbolism was successful.Not that Xianity is worth preserving, but archetypes are.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue Again, the purpose of speech is increase in disambiguation at cost of education whereas purpose of signs is broad association at cost of ambiguation. Active attempt by (((left))) to destroy western symbolism was successful.Not that Xianity is worth preserving, but archetypes are.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141

  • 21) Yes, you are referencing O’keefe etc. border, location, place, hex, spaces.

    21) Yes, you are referencing O’keefe etc. border, location, place, hex, spaces. Ok. 22) all memory fragments are stored where they care calculated (disambiguated). 23) better to back restate past rather than try to fit present into it. 24) Yes, but it’s ACTION in space.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:41:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173487098973868032

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue 19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue 19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410

  • that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) pr

    … that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) problem in this paradigm is that it is trying to create a discipline that is just language facility, and discontinuous. 18) There is no limit to set size indexed, only increase in generalization.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:34:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173483866935480320

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue 15) signs are evidence of action (change in state). how do geological differences, animal scent markers, human mark making differ (intent, choice). 16) space is correct, since all memories are associated by spatio-temporal indices, and it is these space,location,time indices…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173483866935480320

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue 15) signs are evidence of action (change in state). how do geological differences, animal scent markers, human mark making differ (intent, choice). 16) space is correct, since all memories are associated by spatio-temporal indices, and it is these space,location,time indices…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173483866935480320

  • 15) signs are evidence of action (change in state). how do geological difference

    15) signs are evidence of action (change in state). how do geological differences, animal scent markers, human mark making differ (intent, choice). 16) space is correct, since all memories are associated by spatio-temporal indices, and it is these space,location,time indices…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:28:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173483866935480320

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173483033510469632

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue 11) In art we study “mark-making”. 12) there is a relationship between illiteracy and symbolism because of costs 13) Logos(Brands) are decorative standard of weight and measure 14) we are visually dominant, but 20% of people have no internal vision same for internal voice.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173483033510469632

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue 11) In art we study “mark-making”. 12) there is a relationship between illiteracy and symbolism because of costs 13) Logos(Brands) are decorative standard of weight and measure 14) we are visually dominant, but 20% of people have no internal vision same for internal voice.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173483033510469632

  • 11) In art we study “mark-making”. 12) there is a relationship between illiterac

    11) In art we study “mark-making”. 12) there is a relationship between illiteracy and symbolism because of costs 13) Logos(Brands) are decorative standard of weight and measure 14) we are visually dominant, but 20% of people have no internal vision same for internal voice.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:25:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173483033510469632

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173482105235542018

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue 9) economics of signs precision increases cost of learning, generalization and imprecision decreases 10) we use symbols, glyphs, and signals today to demarcate between philosophy (pseudoscience – arbitrary paradigm) and science (constant paradigm as a system of measure.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173482105235542018

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue 9) economics of signs precision increases cost of learning, generalization and imprecision decreases 10) we use symbols, glyphs, and signals today to demarcate between philosophy (pseudoscience – arbitrary paradigm) and science (constant paradigm as a system of measure.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173482105235542018

  • 9) economics of signs precision increases cost of learning, generalization and i

    9) economics of signs precision increases cost of learning, generalization and imprecision decreases 10) we use symbols, glyphs, and signals today to demarcate between philosophy (pseudoscience – arbitrary paradigm) and science (constant paradigm as a system of measure.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:21:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173482105235542018

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173481447119888385

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Semiogogue 5) signs compete in a market of competing paradigms. 6) paradigms need not be consistent nor correspondent, only associative, indexing a narrative or it’s elements. 7) signs hide ignorance under pretense of knowledge. 8) language facility is not vocalization dependent.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173481447119888385

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Semiogogue 5) signs compete in a market of competing paradigms. 6) paradigms need not be consistent nor correspondent, only associative, indexing a narrative or it’s elements. 7) signs hide ignorance under pretense of knowledge. 8) language facility is not vocalization dependent.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173481447119888385

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_42629825242

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_42629825242

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_4262982524222832640_n_466697957260433.jpg PATTERN EMERGING

    (to expand, see grid cells, location cells etc)

    —“…when there are four choices, a quantum search can distinguish between four alternatives in a single step. Indeed, four is optimal number.

    This thinking also explains why there are 20 amino acids. In DNA, each set of three nucleotides defines a single amino acid. So the sequence of triplets in DNA defines the sequence of amino acids in a protein.

    But during protein assembly, each amino acid must be chosen from a soup of 20 different options. Grover’s algorithm explains these numbers: a three-step quantum search can find an object in a database containing up to 20 kinds of entry. Again, 20 is the optimal number.

    In other words, if the search processes involved in assembling DNA and proteins is to be as efficient as possible, the number of bases should be four and the number of amino acids should to be 20—exactly as is found. The only caveat is that the searches must be quantum in nature.”—PATTERN EMERGING

    (to expand, see grid cells, location cells etc)

    —“…when there are four choices, a quantum search can distinguish between four alternatives in a single step. Indeed, four is optimal number.

    This thinking also explains why there are 20 amino acids. In DNA, each set of three nucleotides defines a single amino acid. So the sequence of triplets in DNA defines the sequence of amino acids in a protein.

    But during protein assembly, each amino acid must be chosen from a soup of 20 different options. Grover’s algorithm explains these numbers: a three-step quantum search can find an object in a database containing up to 20 kinds of entry. Again, 20 is the optimal number.

    In other words, if the search processes involved in assembling DNA and proteins is to be as efficient as possible, the number of bases should be four and the number of amino acids should to be 20—exactly as is found. The only caveat is that the searches must be quantum in nature.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 03:01:00 UTC

  • Justice (reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) is measurable in the

    Justice (reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) is measurable in the case of instances. Wisdom (general rules of arbitrary precision given historical distribution of outcomes) are two different rules and measures. So he is correct. Wisdom =virtue. Justice=decides.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-13 22:45:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172642403905355776

    Reply addressees: @eruditenights

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172635372100079617

    IN REPLY TO:

    @eruditenights

    @curtdoolittle it’s hard for me to pull a direct quote but Cicero somewhat agrees with your view of Truth having precedence over Wisdom but instead saying Justice shall be prioritize over Wisdom even though he holds I believe that wisdom is the chief of the virtues

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172635372100079617

  • Unfortunately, the purpose of common language is to capture categories (see thou

    Unfortunately, the purpose of common language is to capture categories (see thought vs reason, rationalism, logic, calculation). The reason we have technical languages is to counter the imprecision of common language. Worse: all “psychologisms” are just shaming by pseudoscience.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-05 03:24:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169451281779441664

    Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169449956035268610

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169449956035268610