So I would have to understand WHY you’re trying to do what you’re doing. To undrestand why your approach suits it. Most people want discounted references by increasing homogeneity of narratives required for symbolism to provide discounts on cognition and trust extension.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:00:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173703101716606977
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue Again, the purpose of speech is increase in disambiguation at cost of education whereas purpose of signs is broad association at cost of ambiguation. Active attempt by (((left))) to destroy western symbolism was successful.Not that Xianity is worth preserving, but archetypes are.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue Again, the purpose of speech is increase in disambiguation at cost of education whereas purpose of signs is broad association at cost of ambiguation. Active attempt by (((left))) to destroy western symbolism was successful.Not that Xianity is worth preserving, but archetypes are.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173702739077083141
Leave a Reply