Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • This is Advanced P-Operationalism, with 20thc Problem = Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert

    This is Advanced P-Operationalism, with 20thc Problem = Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert-Einstein, Hayek-Keynes, Turing-Godel, Doolittle-Mises, with Bridgman (Physics) understanding Einstein partial success without understanding Einstein’s failure. Hilbert failure understanding Brouwer.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 17:17:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192128813842542592

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter 1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TruthRespecter 1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74662391_500450310551864_20088102565

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74662391_500450310551864_20088102565

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74662391_500450310551864_2008810256502620160_o_500450307218531.jpg TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART

    (example of using the grammars)

    I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.

    Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.

    Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.

    Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART

    (example of using the grammars)

    I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.

    Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.

    Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.

    Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 16:48:00 UTC

  • All Grammars (Logics) Perform The Same Function

    [A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.

  • All Grammars (Logics) Perform The Same Function

    [A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.

  • “Is intuitive capacity measurable?”–James Lyons Sr. Yes. We do it all the time.

    —“Is intuitive capacity measurable?”–James Lyons Sr.

    Yes. We do it all the time. Raven’s Matrices.

    That said, general knowledge combined with ordinary ability, and intellectual honesty… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497559464174282&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 17:27:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190319497837719557

  • “Logic is a type of math.”– Not quite true. all grammars perform the same funct

    –“Logic is a type of math.”–

    Not quite true. all grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 14:41:00 UTC

  • “Is intuitive capacity measurable?”–James Lyons Sr. Yes. We do it all the time.

    —“Is intuitive capacity measurable?”–James Lyons Sr.

    Yes. We do it all the time. Raven’s Matrices.

    That said, general knowledge combined with ordinary ability, and intellectual honesty will always achieve more than exceptional ability in the absence of general knowledge and intellectual honesty.

    Intelligence is only enough for complexity.

    Conscientiousness is only enough to work hard on a problem.

    Intellectual honesty is required to come to the right conclusion.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 13:27:00 UTC

  • There is only one Truth, The physical law of nature and it’s measure in mathemat

    There is only one Truth, The physical law of nature and it’s measure in mathematics; and the natural law of man; and it’s measure in economics; Everything else is fairy tail, fiction, fraud, or deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:50:00 UTC

  • starts out by saying that Einstein was revolutionary for saying that “length is

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute—“Doolittle starts out by saying that Einstein was revolutionary for saying that “length is not static; it changes according to its placement in the universe”. The Theory of Relativity was NOT invented by Einstein, but by Henri Poircaré….”—

    What the f–k does that have to do with anything I said. (a) einstein invented the frame, period, end of story, (b) like all of us he combined recent works of others, into a solution none of them had seen – as do all thinkers, myself included, (c) you clearly are not informed or smart enough to comment on this subject.

    Yes, einstein gets an undeserved and disproportionate amount of the credit. It’s equally deserved to Lorentz and Especially Hilbert, who is far smarter than einstein.

    Yes, there is a very great similarity between Einstein getting the rewards from what was lorentz and hilbert’s work, just as Zuckerberg is getting rewards from what was the brother’s work.

    Read this and learn:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute

    Likewise, just because I united popper’s falsification, strawson’s performative truth, chomsky’s grammar, and hayek’s law – and explained why poincare, brouwer and bridgman lost the opertionalist argument, doesn’t mean I”m plagiarizing, any more than einstein taking the various works of others, adding to and uniting them.

    We all stand on the shoulders of others, and all of us move the needle one step at a time forward. Yes, Poincare and lorentz (and maxwell) solved the underlying problem. But no they couldn’t provide the completion of it. I know your motivation is to discredit their only ‘virtuous’ intellectual amidst the long line of criminal liars all the way back into their origins. But it doesn’t work. It just makes you look stupid.

    Don’t stomp on a post to for attention, or to vent from failure to understand, or stress of your own mental reorganization. All you do is tell us you feel out of control in your life. Instead, Post to contribute. And Ask don’t assert.Updated Oct 31, 2019, 8:32 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:50:00 UTC

  • THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP

    THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION

    —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP as a global measure of system performance. One of those problems is that no one has yet to come up with a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496778637585698&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 15:33:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189928391388139522