Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • Tip. All mathematics is just sets of +/- 1 unit (identity) producing ratios (num

    Tip. All mathematics is just sets of +/- 1 unit (identity) producing ratios (numbers). One property: position(direction). Set logic can include more properties than position.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 17:29:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365353330910896136

    Reply addressees: @jskayfshd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365352228333056006

  • Tautological Example. Base 10 vs Base 2. (a)What are each of these bases, and wh

    Tautological Example. Base 10 vs Base 2.
    (a)What are each of these bases, and what variation in testable properties (constant relations)?
    Identity Logic (math)
    Set Logic (set – ideal)
    Operational Logic (actions – real)
    Verbal Logic (speech )
    Autoassociative logic (imagination)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 17:03:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365346655386685445

    Reply addressees: @jskayfshd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365343857521532933

  • The fundamental problems in logic as taught are that while math statements are s

    The fundamental problems in logic as taught are that while math statements are scale-independent unless otherwise stated, only those logical statements that state they are scale-independent are such. Second that almost all nontrivial claims refer to distributions not ideals.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 16:42:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365341400519311361

  • 1 – In the absence of continuous reinforcement in tribal life, to reduce cogniti

    1 – In the absence of continuous reinforcement in tribal life, to reduce cognitive load, and frictions of choice and cooperation, a system of measurement is necessary, and an anthropomorphic system of measurement provides the greatest scope (at least for personal interpersonal social and political questions) at the lowest cost of learning.

    2 – But obviating the sense of responsibility for doubt and error, identifying those who will behave predictably and safely, and providing defense against disapproval and rejection signals (and especially low-status signals), is necessary too. IMO Xianity conflates these two.

    3 – Because we are hypersensitive to status debt and credit in cooperation, religions try to create debt so that the experience of repayment of debt evokes mindfulness (peace of mind). And they try to create a universal debt to create universal responses.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 23:53:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105794581635332868

  • 1 – A system of measurement is necessary, and an anthropomorphic system of measu

    1 – A system of measurement is necessary, and an anthropomorphic system of measurement provides the greatest scope (at least for personal interpersonal social and political questions) at the lowest cost of learning.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 23:42:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365084883589201926

    Reply addressees: @njdigregorio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365082689154519043

  • What does language consist of? 1) Transfer of information via symbols (Referrers

    What does language consist of?
    1) Transfer of information via symbols (Referrers)
    2) By continuous recursive disambiguation
    3) Where symbols (Referrers) consist of measurements
    4) Measurements of relations between sense-perceptions
    5) Within a paradigm of constant relations.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 16:34:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363889840488669185

  • It is this possibility of disambiguation which allows commensurability between t

    It is this possibility of disambiguation which allows commensurability between the three sensory paradigms., Its this commensurability and disambiguation and deflation that the mystic and the sophist hates, because it eliminates loading framing and suggestion (manipulation).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 17:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363540410073817091

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363539978467352577

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes So it is always possible to disambiguate any claim whether physical, verbal, or intuitionistic because we can only associate those three categories. and falsification is dependent on that sequence : auto-association(memory) > intuition(model) > organization(language) > action

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1363539978467352577

  • So it is always possible to disambiguate any claim whether physical, verbal, or

    So it is always possible to disambiguate any claim whether physical, verbal, or intuitionistic because we can only associate those three categories. and falsification is dependent on that sequence : auto-association(memory) > intuition(model) > organization(language) > action

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 17:23:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363539978467352577

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363539100607905792

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes But vocabularies reflect associative paradigms whether physical-actionable-observable, verbal-analogistic-sophistic, or intuitionistic-emotional-occult. There are only so many logics available to the human mind since we are always dependent upon those three human faculties.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1363539100607905792

  • Yes but reality is a costly data and algorithm set, given the distribution of ag

    Yes but reality is a costly data and algorithm set, given the distribution of age, and ability. We must provide wisdom lit for the young to old, and dim to wise. So the problem I see is that while I might state the first causes, they are too precise a tool for imprecise minds.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 16:07:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363520745196953606

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363519777252245511

  • Notes on Dyer and Thomas’ first video.

    Jay’s argument should be ‘Logical’ only means internally consistent in the pursuit of an end, vs True, meaning testimonial, meaning testifiable, meaning non-conflationary, consistent, actionable, correspondent, coherent, limited, and complete under realism, naturalism and operationalism, free of loading, framing, suggestion and obscurantism. Ergo as wisdom literature, all faiths are some degree of logical in the sense of internally consistent and utilitarian. They are true in the lower standard of providing a paradigm of action that produces desird ends. They are not “true” in the sense that they are also testifiable.

    The Christian faith is logical within the conflationary system of thought that is not limited by constraints of testimony under realism, naturalism, non-conflation (identity), operationalism (actionability) and correspondence. The fact that Christian theology as wisdom literature has produced the most complete system of non-aggression, tolerance, submission, non-adversarialism, and produces exceptional serfs, peasants, citizens, and to some degree sovereigns is simply a fact because it trains the intuition by continuous reinforcement of the suppression of dominance expression (at rather obvious costs).
    (I’ve come to agree with the criticism of Protestantism largely because it causes doubling down on occultism and sophistry rather than the nearly legalistic discipline of the catholic church. That said, as far as I can tell, the competition between romanticism – the restoration of natural religion – and Christianity, and marxism-secularism in the 1800’s in response to the scientific, industrial, and Darwinian evolution, meant a failure of romanticism was the great missed opportunity to restore our religion of the primacy of man and our transcendence through action INTO gods. The church failed to reform into natural law and science as evidence of our greater understanding of god’s will, and the success of marxism as a materialistic promise of reward in life after revolution in the modern world, like supernatural promise of reward in an afterlife in the ancient world. )
    The problem is that it teaches Christians to lie using the Abrahamic system of lying. Although again, there is a difference between an evolutionary one (science), a beneficial but stagnating wisdom literature (Christianity), a parasitic wisdom lit (Judaism), or a predatory and destructive one (Islam). (Dylan has gone from philosophy(justification) to sophistry (verbalism) to theology (occult). Some of us evolve from mythology to history to science producing testimony. Some of us evolve from mythology to theology to occultism. It depends on whether you were born with the feminine bias in empathic understanding or the masculine bias in analytic understanding. That’s why religiosity is heritable, and those of us who have a lesser NEED for empathy choose the sciences. It’s not complicated. Although we might have to separate just as the left and right must separate. Because as far as I can tell what I think we are seeing is a restoration of demand for speciation now that the agrarian age of homogenization is over.