So it is always possible to disambiguate any claim whether physical, verbal, or intuitionistic because we can only associate those three categories. and falsification is dependent on that sequence : auto-association(memory) > intuition(model) > organization(language) > action
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 17:23:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363539978467352577
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363539100607905792
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes But vocabularies reflect associative paradigms whether physical-actionable-observable, verbal-analogistic-sophistic, or intuitionistic-emotional-occult. There are only so many logics available to the human mind since we are always dependent upon those three human faculties.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1363539100607905792
Leave a Reply