Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • “PFS had it right – you’ll want the people who can afford to spend a week in a r

    –“PFS had it right – you’ll want the people who can afford to spend a week in a remote resort town.”–Shannon’s Pepe @ShannonsDemon

    Agree.
    I learned a lot from the Mises and PFS movements, about the importance of organizing by personal relations, and the agency and ability of those you want within them.
    But as long as Hoppe is ‘unhappy’ with me despite our solving social science in three generations, we can’t persist his or the PFS legacies – though he views PFS as a personal gathering and not so much a movement, and that might be OK with him.
    As such we have to start our own. We’ve shown we can. We just have a little more work to do. And the timing seems about right.

    -Cheers

    PS: Jewish Rothbard, German Hoppe, Anglo Doolittle is an interesting series through the convenient rearview mirror. The different ethics of the clerks(clan, separatists), the soldiers(hierarchy, duty), and the warriors(peers, heroism). This fundamental difference in organization and responsibility determines how we view one another, and how we project our civilzation as a universal.

    @mises, (Hoppe isn’t on Twitter that I know of)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 13:01:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645411807094272005

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645406962660564992

  • “PFS had it right – you’ll want the people who can afford to spend a week in a r

    –“PFS had it right – you’ll want the people who can afford to spend a week in a remote resort town.”–Shannon’s Pepe @ShannonsDemon

    Agree.
    I learned a lot from the Mises and PFS movements, about the importance of organizing by personal relations, and the agency and ability of those you want within them.
    But as long as Hoppe is ‘unhappy’ with me despite our solving social science in three generations, we can’t persist his or the PFS legacies – though he views PFS as a personal gathering and not so much a movement, and that might be OK with him.
    As such we have to start our own. We’ve shown we can. We just have a little more work to do. And the timing seems about right.

    -Cheers

    PS: Jewish Rothbard, German Hoppe, Anglo Doolittle is an interesting series through the convenient rearview mirror. The different ethics of the clerks(clan, separatists), the soldiers(hierarchy, duty), and the warriors(peers, heroism). This fundamental difference in organization and responsibility determines how we view one another, and how we project our civilzation as a universal.

    @mises, (Hoppe isn’t on Twitter that I know of)

    Reply addressees: @ShannonsDemon @DeadScrump

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 13:01:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645411806939062273

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645406962660564992

  • We don’t have a gun violence problem. We have a black violence problem. Becuase

    We don’t have a gun violence problem.
    We have a black violence problem.
    Becuase we have a black family problem.
    Because we have a black community problem.
    Because we have a prohibition on full integration problem.
    And because we have a forced association problem, without full integration.
    Because in the 1960’s the democrats destroyed the black family, the black community, and the rise of black-centric middle class and elites, and relocated blacks, using the soviet model, to urban slums, to tilt elections in democratic favor, and the result has been the ‘destruction of our cities’ and the ‘black family and community’ as a consequence.
    It takes only about 6 to 8% of a hostile minority to destroy the society, polity, and economy of a city. And you’ve done it and yoi keep doing it.
    So no, you may not end our right to defend against an increasingly authoritarian government because you cannot create stable families, cannot control the behavior of your community, AND you vote for the people who won’t control it, AND you blame others for your failure in both casese, while falsely claiming you’re the victims.
    So, own it.
    Yes, ‘whitness’ (logic, science, natural law) is the most emotionally and psychologically difficult personal, social, economic, and political order man has invented, because it maximizes individual responsibility, and punishes by market and institutional means those who cannot or will not accept personal responsibility.
    Yes there is some truth to the earlier and deeper sexual maturity of the black community driving greater chances of conflict over status. But denying this fact exacerbates the problem.
    If you are saying your people are unfit for advanced civilization, then the evidence is to the contrary, because most of the progress of black america was made BEFORE the civil rights movement, forced integration (mutual destruction) and johnson’s (soviet) relocation program.
    As always, the man in the mirror is to blame.
    Own it.
    You aren’t victims.
    Of anything other than yourselves.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:32:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645404407809359872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645151525742804994

  • We don’t have a gun violence problem. We have a black violence problem. Becuase

    We don’t have a gun violence problem.
    We have a black violence problem.
    Becuase we have a black family problem.
    Because we have a black community problem.
    Because we have a prohibition on full integration problem.
    And because we have a forced association problem, without full integration.
    Because in the 1960’s the democrats destroyed the black family, the black community, and the rise of black-centric middle class and elites, and relocated blacks, using the soviet model, to urban slums, to tilt elections in democratic favor, and the result has been the ‘destruction of our cities’ and the ‘black family and community’ as a consequence.
    It takes only about 6 to 8% of a hostile minority to destroy the society, polity, and economy of a city. And you’ve done it and yoi keep doing it.
    So no, you may not end our right to defend against an increasingly authoritarian government because you cannot create stable families, cannot control the behavior of your community, AND you vote for the people who won’t control it, AND you blame others for your failure in both casese, while falsely claiming you’re the victims.
    So, own it.
    Yes, ‘whitness’ (logic, science, natural law) is the most emotionally and psychologically difficult personal, social, economic, and political order man has invented, because it maximizes individual responsibility, and punishes by market and institutional means those who cannot or will not accept personal responsibility.
    Yes there is some truth to the earlier and deeper sexual maturity of the black community driving greater chances of conflict over status. But denying this fact exacerbates the problem.
    If you are saying your people are unfit for advanced civilization, then the evidence is to the contrary, because most of the progress of black america was made BEFORE the civil rights movement, forced integration (mutual destruction) and johnson’s (soviet) relocation program.
    As always, the man in the mirror is to blame.
    Own it.
    You aren’t victims.
    Of anything other than yourselves.

    Reply addressees: @Justinjpearson

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:32:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645404407608008706

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645151525742804994

  • Correct. Now, how long before this knowledge we’ve so painfully earned evovles i

    Correct.
    Now, how long before this knowledge we’ve so painfully earned evovles into a norm – if it ever does? I dunno.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:14:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645399825523900417

    Reply addressees: @DeadScrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645397995075018756

  • Explain? AFAIK NASA was terrified by the end of the apollo and space shuttle pro

    Explain? AFAIK NASA was terrified by the end of the apollo and space shuttle programs so they switched to many smaller missions less likely to get the whole org shut down. What is ideologically infected? (I just don’t know)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 02:17:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645249655997886473

    Reply addressees: @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645243346812583936

  • HRE repeatedly retuned power to city states. The term liberty refers to the gran

    HRE repeatedly retuned power to city states. The term liberty refers to the grant of permission for local custom and law.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-09 01:15:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644871748163194881

    Reply addressees: @Ian_Gibbs_0311

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644870347022376964

  • @elonmusk @TwitterBlue CAUTION: The pace of feature change at Twitter is too slo

    @elonmusk @TwitterBlue
    CAUTION: The pace of feature change at Twitter is too slow to prevent competitors and market fragmentation from sapping the platform – and we need a public ‘debate’ platform.
    The emphasis on truth and transparency is good.
    The need for a TruthChatAI is increasing and will provide competitive advantage against the woke mobs.
    The need for organizing and styling content (tweets, posts, articles, documents) is obvious and not challenging.
    The need for branding the individual and business profiles, including images, videos, and ORGANIZING them is there, simple, and obvious.
    The need for private groups is increasing, and easily available.
    Please don’t leave the new market-siezing features until AFTER you’ve solved the hard problem of content and bots. You’re just slowing your revenue growth. This isn’t Ebay, Tesla, SpaceX or Boring where competitors are slow and weak legacies. Competition can move faster.
    (And yes I’ve bought and reformed tech companies with code-disasters and I understand the problem.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-08 14:33:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644709952760553475

  • @elonmusk @TwitterBlue CAUTION: The pace of feature change at Twitter is too slo

    @elonmusk @TwitterBlue
    CAUTION: The pace of feature change at Twitter is too slow to prevent competitors and market fragmentation from sapping the platform – and we need a public ‘debate’ platform.
    The emphasis on truth and transparency is good.
    The need for a TruthChatAI is increasing and will provide competitive advantage against the woke mobs.
    The need for organizing and styling content (tweets, posts, articles, documents) is obvious and not challenging.
    The need for branding the individual and business profiles, including images, videos, and ORGANIZING them is there, simple, and obvious.
    The need for private groups is increasing, and easily available.
    Please don’t leave the new market-siezing features until AFTER you’ve solved the hard problem of content and bots. You’re just slowing your revenue growth. This isn’t Ebay, Tesla, SpaceX or Boring where competitors are slow and weak legacies. Competition can move faster.
    (And yes I’ve bought and reformed tech companies with code-disasters and I understand the problem.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-08 14:33:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644709952617938946

  • Proposes a single cause. Whereas neoteny creates potential. Institutions are nec

    Proposes a single cause.
    Whereas neoteny creates potential.
    Institutions are necessary to enforce it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-08 02:41:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644530928490881025

    Reply addressees: @Eggggggg_ggggg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644524046204432384