Theme: Institution

  • We’ve demonstrated the value of 360s in my companies repeatedly – it works if yo

    We’ve demonstrated the value of 360s in my companies repeatedly – it works if you are very specific that it must be voluntary, constructive, curated, and ongoing instead of on a schedule. We’ve also demonstrated that you can remove most “useless” middle management if you distribute the work to a small number of people in each group. And this has the benefit of teaching everyone how to do the next job in their development.

    Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 12:05:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647571803169062914

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647274276435656705

  • You have an odd racialist need that overstates genetics and understates civiliza

    You have an odd racialist need that overstates genetics and understates civilizational institutions and the resulting culture. And you want attention. I don’t rely on the narcissistic trait or the dark triad behaviors to criticize people even when it’s true because women use the term like a universal solvent. That said you express all three traits.
    This is a new account for you so I just haven’t blocked you yet in order to determine if you’ve come up with some new nonsense. But no. Same attention whoring.

    Reply addressees: @ThreeSDNordid @charlesmurray


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 11:55:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647569507852926977

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647567303402307585

  • You have an odd racialist need that overstates genetics and understates civiliza

    You have an odd racialist need that overstates genetics and understates civilizational institutions and the resulting culture. And you want attention. I don’t rely on the narcissistic trait or the dark triad behaviors to criticize people even when it’s true because women use the term like a universal solvent. That said you express all three traits.
    This is a new account for you so I just haven’t blocked you yet in order to determine if you’ve come up with some new nonsense. But no. Same attention whoring.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 11:55:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647569507920011266

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647567303402307585

  • Global capitalism isnt possible w/o the anglosphere creating the conditions for

    Global capitalism isnt possible w/o the anglosphere creating the conditions for it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 10:39:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647550285936484353

    Reply addressees: @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647307060944465927

  • Responses are evidence that my assessment is correct. In general, empathizing an

    Responses are evidence that my assessment is correct.
    In general, empathizing and ignorance don’t scale. If you don’t have experience managing others at scale you dont have competency without the above education in the difficulty of scale. If you don’t know at least behavioral, micro, and political economics then you are too ignorant to hold an opinion of what mankind is capable of – and not. If you don’t know civilizational differences in rates of development or stagnation you don’t know what scale of cooperation mankind is capable of and not. If you don’t know the natural, common, concurrent law, you don’t know what ills mankind is capable of. If you don’t know cognitive science, you don’t know what mankind’s mind is capable of with without discipline.

    And that’s what ‘teachers’ are ‘teaching’: institutionalized ignorance, and it’s playing out in friendships, mating, marriage and family, employment, the competitiveness of industries, the demographic collapse, and the coming contraction of relative wealth of our civilization.

    Why? Feminine evasion of responsibility and duty for the possiblity of the returns on scale. Under the false pretense of kindness, compassion, and empathy – which creates infantilism and maladaptation: fragility, and as such is just failure of the responsibility to teach.

    Versus the production of anti-fragility by teaching them the europeaen tradition of stoicism – or what we call ‘adulthood’ – habituation into the conduct of adversarial competition toward moral ends of all by teaching insulation from the “emotional weakness pettiness and irresponsibility of others.”

    Just is. I don’t make the laws of the universe. But some of us accept the responsibility of preventing those who fancy that by social construction of illusions we can circumvent those laws of the universe.

    And those foolish people drag those of us who are not, down with them – unless we separate and go our separage political ways.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 03:43:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647445647480565762

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647425519665786881


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Do you teach responsibility for self determination by self determined means, and responsibility for requring others to do the same, and the responsibility of truth before face regardless of consequences, and basic behavioral and micro economics, or that adversarial conflict and competition resulting in discovery of previously unknown opportunties for all, or that western civ was the only one to survive exhaustion of agrarian civiization and subsequent stagnation decline after 800ad of every other civ, or that this demand for the maximization of individual responsibilty for both the private and the common is the reason you have the opportunity to engage in teaching children the exact oppposite?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1647425519665786881

  • Responses are evidence that my assessment is correct. In general, empathizing an

    Responses are evidence that my assessment is correct.
    In general, empathizing and ignorance don’t scale. If you don’t have experience managing others at scale you dont have competency without the above education in the difficulty of scale. If you don’t know at least behavioral, micro, and political economics then you are too ignorant to hold an opinion of what mankind is capable of – and not. If you don’t know civilizational differences in rates of development or stagnation you don’t know what scale of cooperation mankind is capable of and not. If you don’t know the natural, common, concurrent law, you don’t know what ills mankind is capable of. If you don’t know cognitive science, you don’t know what mankind’s mind is capable of with without discipline.

    And that’s what ‘teachers’ are ‘teaching’: institutionalized ignorance, and it’s playing out in friendships, mating, marriage and family, employment, the competitiveness of industries, the demographic collapse, and the coming contraction of relative wealth of our civilization.

    Why? Feminine evasion of responsibility and duty for the possiblity of the returns on scale. Under the false pretense of kindness, compassion, and empathy – which creates infantilism and maladaptation: fragility, and as such is just failure of the responsibility to teach.

    Versus the production of anti-fragility by teaching them the europeaen tradition of stoicism – or what we call ‘adulthood’ – habituation into the conduct of adversarial competition toward moral ends of all by teaching insulation from the “emotional weakness pettiness and irresponsibility of others.”

    Just is. I don’t make the laws of the universe. But some of us accept the responsibility of preventing those who fancy that by social construction of illusions we can circumvent those laws of the universe.

    And those foolish people drag those of us who are not, down with them – unless we separate and go our separage political ways.

    Reply addressees: @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 03:43:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647445647300206593

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647425519665786881


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Do you teach responsibility for self determination by self determined means, and responsibility for requring others to do the same, and the responsibility of truth before face regardless of consequences, and basic behavioral and micro economics, or that adversarial conflict and competition resulting in discovery of previously unknown opportunties for all, or that western civ was the only one to survive exhaustion of agrarian civiization and subsequent stagnation decline after 800ad of every other civ, or that this demand for the maximization of individual responsibilty for both the private and the common is the reason you have the opportunity to engage in teaching children the exact oppposite?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1647425519665786881

  • LAWYER COMPETENCY PLUS CLIENT COMPETENCY Any of us who are extremely competent i

    LAWYER COMPETENCY PLUS CLIENT COMPETENCY
    Any of us who are extremely competent in matters of the law are often better tacticians than the law firms we employ.
    There is a simple reason for it: we have more knowledge of self and opposition than the lawyers do; we know how the opposition can deceive better than the lawyers do; we know the subtleties of our industries better than the lawyers do and therefore the ‘schemes’ that both sides can employ; the constraint on lawyers is greater than plaintiff or defendant; the lawyers have reputations in court and are often known by the judge, so they are more cautious in relation to the judge – though most lawyers are better at defending against this than others.
    In my experience, in matters of responsibility and blame (guilt) we are often better than our lawyers. As a matter of court procedure, and knowledge of the legislation, regulation, and prior findings of the court (much of what lawyers do), they are usually far superior. So the combination of client and lawyer competency plays out in court.
    I’ve had to resist blurting out that something a judge, opposing counsel, or prosecutor has said that’s profoundly illogical, stupid, or ignorant more times than I can count. And sometimes you wonder how the entire system works at all below the appellate level.
    And so, this is one of the best reasons for juries. Juries are surprisingly good at detection of dishonesty and incompetence. And this is why it is always best in business to ‘do the right thing’ because if you explain that to the jury, even if the outcome wasn’t expected, you’ll have an advantage.
    The continued deprivation of the people from juries and even from juridical defense, in addition to the ‘privileges’ the court has granted itself through procedure, or via the legislature, combined with the total failure of positive law (divorce, education, involuntary association) is the reason for the decline in public respect for the court, the legislature, and the law.
    Citizens can only do the right thing as long as legislatures and judges do. This is why rule of law and only rule of law by the natural law (what we had) is the means of providing the optimum political order of cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 13:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647235129293656070

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646957880128548865

  • LAWYER COMPETENCY PLUS CLIENT COMPETENCY Any of us who are extremely competent i

    LAWYER COMPETENCY PLUS CLIENT COMPETENCY
    Any of us who are extremely competent in matters of the law are often better tacticians than the law firms we employ.
    There is a simple reason for it: we have more knowledge of self and opposition than the lawyers do; we know how the opposition can deceive better than the lawyers do; we know the subtleties of our industries better than the lawyers do and therefore the ‘schemes’ that both sides can employ; the constraint on lawyers is greater than plaintiff or defendant; the lawyers have reputations in court and are often known by the judge, so they are more cautious in relation to the judge – though most lawyers are better at defending against this than others.
    In my experience, in matters of responsibility and blame (guilt) we are often better than our lawyers. As a matter of court procedure, and knowledge of the legislation, regulation, and prior findings of the court (much of what lawyers do), they are usually far superior. So the combination of client and lawyer competency plays out in court.
    I’ve had to resist blurting out that something a judge, opposing counsel, or prosecutor has said that’s profoundly illogical, stupid, or ignorant more times than I can count. And sometimes you wonder how the entire system works at all below the appellate level.
    And so, this is one of the best reasons for juries. Juries are surprisingly good at detection of dishonesty and incompetence. And this is why it is always best in business to ‘do the right thing’ because if you explain that to the jury, even if the outcome wasn’t expected, you’ll have an advantage.
    The continued deprivation of the people from juries and even from juridical defense, in addition to the ‘privileges’ the court has granted itself through procedure, or via the legislature, combined with the total failure of positive law (divorce, education, involuntary association) is the reason for the decline in public respect for the court, the legislature, and the law.
    Citizens can only do the right thing as long as legislatures and judges do. This is why rule of law and only rule of law by the natural law (what we had) is the means of providing the optimum political order of cooperation.

    Reply addressees: @tom_steely @DWeiss36 @lawofruby


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 13:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647235129088126976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646957880128548865

  • Well then accept a group hug of appreciation from all of us in the organization

    Well then accept a group hug of appreciation from all of us in the organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-13 18:24:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646580102484901888

    Reply addressees: @KurtosisEnjoyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646577836424134671

  • (NLI Update) As many of you know, we formed The Institute over ten years ago, ba

    (NLI Update)
    As many of you know, we formed The Institute over ten years ago, back in 2012 in Ukraine. And for a variety of reasons it’s taken until now to repatriate the organization to the USA. I just want to thank Brandon for making it happen. And our lawyer for making it…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 14:27:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646158117418287107