Yes. Mostly though it’s driven by the institutional lag in suppression of criminality given that males lead in both positive and negative physical and political, and women follow, in negative social and political. So we could easily suppress female antisocial anti-political and…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 19:11:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657463609889259522
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657462487216791553
Sorry but you err. The federalist mission to restore the court, restore the legitimacy of law, by requiring all change go through the legislative process testing concurrency (agreement across regions and classes) reversing the legal positivism and activism of the Marxists, that undermined the law by bypassing the people the congress and due process. The result was unsettled law when the court, through commonality and the legislature through concurrency, are designed to require consensus in both the good (legislation) and the bad (judicial remedy).
So no. The whole point is to end your demand for authoritarianism and restore due process of legislative and legal change.
We have the legislature and we have the amendment process, and these require agreement across numbers, classes, and regions – specifically so we don’t result in unsettled law by authority whether false authority of the majority or false authority of the court or false authority of the legislature.
If you don’t understand these things then you are a threat to rule of law from which democracy is the means of determining concurrency: agreement.
Reply addressees: @LandSharkJones @TheRichFromCali
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 19:23:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657104106303913984
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657073786934403073
I am a jeffersonian christian, in that jesus was a philosopher only able to speak in the language and logic of his location and time, and the church was a politica system that sought to bring cheap semitic rule by superstition where costly european rule by reason – an aristocatic method – was ‘challenging’ to bring to the wider word of vast underclasses made worse by the prosperity the aristocacy had created giving slaves, underclasses and women the relative safety and choice that for the first time ’empowered’ them at least a little bit.
So I am loyal to the truth: the laws of nature. Christianity despite it’s church nonsense and superstition does inform us how to produce a higher trust society more prepared for economic prosperity by treating everyone as a customer – of cooperation. It’s utility-bearing but not true.
This means I am opposed to hostile religions, and tolerant of christian superstition of the peasantry. But I am and always will be aristocracy: sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, under rule of law insured by force of arms. As such my loyalty is to the people regardless of their weakness or folly.
And, the duty of the peasantry, as jesus counseled, is to be loyal to the aristocracy in matters of reality (the state).
Reply addressees: @GEsenhourn @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 12:43:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657003678924955649
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656930500705939456
REMINDER FOR ALL: INSTITUTE DECORUM
(we’ve added new people to the team)
Institute Decorum prohibits blanket statements against races and subraces on genetic means, rather than their habits, norms, traditions, religions, metaphysics, group strategies of their cultures, their…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 19:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656737914057900032
REMINDER FOR ALL: INSTITUTE DECORUM
(we’ve added new people to the team)
Institute Decorum prohibits blanket statements against races and subraces on genetic means, rather than their habits, norms, traditions, religions, metaphysics, group strategies of their cultures, their stage of development, or consequences of their demographic distributions.
All human populations evolved a group evolutionary strategy in a given geography, with given resources, competitors, institutional sequence, and demographic distributions. And all are somewhat anchored in that time of their formation.
Meanwhile, modernity drags people and their formal and informal institutions out of that anchoring, and it’s hard for all. Europeans did it over between a thousand and four hundred years – depending upon where you start counting. Other groups are trying to make even greater leaps forward in decades to centuries – without our advantages.
And yes, despite the postwar pseudoscientific attack on Darwinian evolution and sex, class, and race differences, there are well-understood differences between the races that are as significant as differences between other related species. These differences are universally expressed whenever the scale of the population permits, because of simple affinity of appearance, behavior, and instinct.
However, we can all cooperate across polities even if our differences create conflict within polities. Humans are marginally indifferent in our ability to cooperate particularly by trade. And peace, harmony, cooperation, and prosperity are relatively easy to produce regardless of our differences.
And, none of us is without sin so to speak.
So avoid dismissivness, slang, slurs, invective, provocation, accusation, and avoid heated arguments. Instead remain judicial decorum and state the facts. Our job is to write defenses, prosecutions, and judgements of natural law by tests of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence and beauty, by explaining how individual and group claims vary (or not) from that universal natural law. In other words, we judge whether people are creating crimes – or not – especially crimes against the commons, whether physical, formal institutional, or informal institutional. And state the severity of the crime, and the restitution that would be necessary given the crime.
The Institute has as much interest in advancing the interests of the rest of mankind as it does the Anglosphere and Eurosphere.
Please Bookmark.
Thanks
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 19:07:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656737913751601153
This post is unacceptable.
Institute Decorum prohibits blanket statements against races, rather than habits, norms, traditions, religions, metaphysics, group strategies of their cultures, their stage of development, or consequences of their demographic distributions.
None of us…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:35:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656729772859195411
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656727644182806531
Are anglo institutions superior to other country’s institutions? Well, while all scandinavian institutions are well organized, only the anglo are ‘scientific’, and the only competitor of size is germany, and germany has taken itself out of international affairs, where the UK maintains responsibility for international affairs – perhaps better than the USA.
As far as I know this is just true, for the simple reason that anglo civ varies least from science.
Reply addressees: @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 13:46:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656657121767727106
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656655827074453504
Are you loyal to american and our rich anglo institutions first or are you loyal to your religion tradition and culture first?
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:47:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656642167044206592
Reply addressees: @anneapplebaum
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656629995052122115
I understand gods (all of them, including the 500 or so dead ones we know of so far) as systems of measurement for organizing people by providing commensurability in thought, value, and behavior, reducing friction, especially as populations increase in anonymity, that persists a group evolutionary strategy across generations. In other words a set of anthropomorphic and therefore easily accessible by humans, headman, ruler, or natural influence without education or knowledge.
The primary psychological purpose of gods is to limit the influencde approval, diasapproval, and judgement of others by creating a standard and by adherence to that standard suppression of neuroticism and conflict.
Reply addressees: @ScienceMonthly
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 00:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656462516627677185
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656455152285655042
2023 05 04 Staff Meeting short
https://youtu.be/WYX4YT9BLa0
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 15:58:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655603139309961217