REMINDER FOR ALL: INSTITUTE DECORUM (we’ve added new people to the team) Institu

REMINDER FOR ALL: INSTITUTE DECORUM
(we’ve added new people to the team)

Institute Decorum prohibits blanket statements against races and subraces on genetic means, rather than their habits, norms, traditions, religions, metaphysics, group strategies of their cultures, their stage of development, or consequences of their demographic distributions.

All human populations evolved a group evolutionary strategy in a given geography, with given resources, competitors, institutional sequence, and demographic distributions. And all are somewhat anchored in that time of their formation.

Meanwhile, modernity drags people and their formal and informal institutions out of that anchoring, and it’s hard for all. Europeans did it over between a thousand and four hundred years – depending upon where you start counting. Other groups are trying to make even greater leaps forward in decades to centuries – without our advantages.

And yes, despite the postwar pseudoscientific attack on Darwinian evolution and sex, class, and race differences, there are well-understood differences between the races that are as significant as differences between other related species. These differences are universally expressed whenever the scale of the population permits, because of simple affinity of appearance, behavior, and instinct.

However, we can all cooperate across polities even if our differences create conflict within polities. Humans are marginally indifferent in our ability to cooperate particularly by trade. And peace, harmony, cooperation, and prosperity are relatively easy to produce regardless of our differences.

And, none of us is without sin so to speak.

So avoid dismissivness, slang, slurs, invective, provocation, accusation, and avoid heated arguments. Instead remain judicial decorum and state the facts. Our job is to write defenses, prosecutions, and judgements of natural law by tests of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence and beauty, by explaining how individual and group claims vary (or not) from that universal natural law. In other words, we judge whether people are creating crimes – or not – especially crimes against the commons, whether physical, formal institutional, or informal institutional. And state the severity of the crime, and the restitution that would be necessary given the crime.

The Institute has as much interest in advancing the interests of the rest of mankind as it does the Anglosphere and Eurosphere.

Please Bookmark.

Thanks
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute