Evolution doesn’t car about any such thing and hasn’t for thousands of years. All that matters today is the scale of cooperation made possible by the scale of impersonal institutions. You are more dependent upon the demographics of your population than you are on your own ability…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 18:55:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712180032561389782
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712178920806895664
You see, the Five Eyes (Anglosphere) can trust each other (well, not so much canada under Trudeau). This is much harder to accomplish in europe because france has maintained her ancient desire to dominate europe, despite that they are unworthy of it. Germany has still not overcome her guilt, and while she must lead refuses to. Poland on the other hand is starting to lead, and if she brings the Intermarium into being with Ukraine the slavs will be far more powerful than the french. And if germans don’t start imitating the poles and hungarians there aren’t going to be any germans in germany.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 17:37:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712160525197443072
I’ve worked on this so thougoughly as have others before me but it’s pretty simple sequence:
A universal military indoctrinated into nationalism (patriotism) This is the most important factor: break men down as individuals and rebuild them as citizen soldiers. If you cannot do this you cannot have a modern economy or state.
Add a monarchy as head of state, and judge of last resort, to prevent military, theological, or ideological, or even elite capture of the state. (monarchy with veto power, and being above the law in the restoration of the law)
Monarchy and Military implementation of a Judiciary under Rule of law (property rights basically, but that just means natural human rights).
Once rule of law is estsablished, a senate of reprsentatives of the regions (provinces etc)
When a middle class begins to develop then a house of commons or parliament.
When labor is fully mobilized such that there are surpluses then a house of labor or lower house of parliament.
If you follow this sequenc you will be fine. But it appears that without a universal militia and universal indoctrination into loyalty to the commons FIRST above loyalty to self, family, or clan, you cannot build the rest of the sequence without pervasive corruption.
Reply addressees: @Jake385719
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 16:51:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712149029696483328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712120220238917680
(I try to avoid that explicit statement, yes.)
IQ advantage, cultural advantage, institutional advantage, scientific and technological advantage, leading to economic advantage.
Yes criticisms that the USA supports israel heavily are true. However, given that much of the world is depednet upon freedom of trade in oil, israel provides a constant and durable ally and platfom (that is dependent upon us), that allows us to continue to drag mankind incrementally out of poverty and into economic and medial if not political modernity, by preserving the world patterns of finance, law, specialization and trade. Without which the world would rapidly decline to 19th century monopoly civilizations, recurrent wars, and predation on the small by the big.
Reply addressees: @caleb_pelon @OtonielFilho5
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 16:37:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712145443990155265
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712143444527702136
Under feudalism (distributed rule), the aristocracy (military), needed to maintain landholdings(production) in the family by giving it to the eldest (Primogeniture) instead of distributing it to all the males. This caused much of the aristocracy that had no other options to take positions in the churches which were all paid for by these aristocratic femilies. This meant that the aristocdracy owned both the manor and the church, and they divided responsibility giving church management of the peasants in matters of behaviora and morals, and the manor in matters of property, and the shire courts, city courts, and parliament for escalating resolution of disputes. The aristocratic families would then accumulate land in the local church to provide income for these sons. The church landsd were not taxed. Over time the church held half of all land in Europe.
Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @MinClaydough
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-07 17:39:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710711532655419392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710644091015373130
I don’t view it incorrectly.
Look it up:Trifunctionalism. Read Dumezil.
When you’re done ask me to explain the only possible institutions of coercion, and how each civilization evolved them, and what the consequences were.
Aristocracy is the term for rule by the best, and that was always the military families. Christianity was possible because it gave the women slaves and bottom classes a means of status in aristocratic civilization, despite no ability or resources – by just doing nothing wrong.
Reply addressees: @MinClaydough
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-07 00:56:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710459111664398338
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710455640617877932
I know you would like to think that but for five thousand years the three pillars have been the military(aristocracy), the law, and the religion. This is why the west is the only ‘trifunctional’ civilization. We separate the state, the law (think constitution, rights, common law) and the faith and we have always had three sets of elites. This is why the church could never fully succeed – it was captured by the aristocdracy who used it as a holding company for local land under primogeniture.
If instead you said The Militia(arms), the Constitution(Law), and Christianity(the faith) then that trifuncitonal organization is what makes us special.
The difference between us is only which of these we give priority to in which circumstancde. The aristocdracy the military, the burghers the law, and the peasants the faith.
The state is trying to coopt all three – ending trifunctionalism and creating yet another monopoly that is the reason every other civlization failed to bring about modernity but us.. Thats why we must end it.
Reply addressees: @MinClaydough
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-07 00:33:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710453220504375296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710452165532065866
No the people have been disintermediated from the courts by the left. It’s rather easy to restore the power to the poor in the courts, if we, as in the past, and as is common in europe, create and administrative court.
While in the past you had access to the Manor (nobility) and in our constitution should have access to your representative both local, state, and federal – as an escalation path. This is no longer possible becuase of legal activism.
We can restore these rights and restore people to defense and access – and we can do it without the most vulnerable and gullible sectors of the polity enabling bad legislation and law whose promise is impossible to fulfill and produces the opposite of the claimed ends.
Reply addressees: @Chargerfryar @ThruTheHayes @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710414503391711232
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710412227931742429
There are only so many ways to pay for the commons.
1. One is commissions from the activity created by the market created by the institutions including that of law. This can be either sales or income.
Income causes the LEAST interference in the pricing system and human behavior.
Sales too much influence on both.,
2. The other is payment for services: We either pay for services directly allocated to us, in itemized fashion every year;
Or
We use direct economic democracy with the budgets for each thing we need to finance, and we individually allocate our funds to whatever we wish, until all funds are allocated.
The problem with the second one is that people will try to game it and try to free ride on it.
Progressive taxation means the wealthy pay for nearly all taxes, which is how america works despite the rancor of the left, and more than half of the people free ride on the taxes paid by the wealthy – given only half us contribute meaningfully to taxes, and of those who do almost all are white males over 35.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:56:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710413711645507584
There are only so many ways to pay for the commons.
One is commissions from the activity created by the market created by the institutions including that of law. This can be either sales or income. Income causes the LEAST interference in the pricing system and human behavior.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:19:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710404440337891545
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710402427315278238