Theme: Institution

  • WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES? Richard; –“What jumps out to me in th

    WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES?

    Richard;

    –“What jumps out to me in these figures is not only how left leaning large institutions are, but how the same is true for most professions.”– Richard Hanania

    WHAT JUMPS OUT?
    What jumps out at me is insulation from the market.
    Luxury Beliefs and Virtue Signaling are both possible and endemic, and match Veblen’s prediction of the wealth effect. “The reason to become educated is to escape the market (and work).”

    DIFFERENCES
    – Conservatives are directly participating in the market. The business owners across the variety of self employed of all scales directly interact with the market.
    This means they are personally responsible for capital.
    -versus-
    – The government
    – The big industries
    – The academy and education
    – The professions and white collar office workers
    – Most women
    All are insulated from the market by scale (or husbands).
    This means they are personally not responsible for capital.
    Which means the are not responsible for risk.

    What separates urban and suburban-rural voters?
    Responsibility for, and capacity for resonsibilty for capital.
    Cities generate demand for authority in lieu of responsibility and territories generate remand for responsibilty in lieu of authority.

    Why? *Asymmetry of Risk* and *Asymmetry of Responsibility*”

    If taxes were allocated by symmetry of risk then the ‘red’ group wouldn’t pay any at all. (In fact, it makes no sense that we tax any of the tradesmen in the country at all. They only contribute 3% to total taxation, and they burn their bodies by their late forties. (Yes our organization proposes this particular tax change.)

    What are the behavioral differences between males and females? Asymmetry of tolerance for risk, and therefore asymmetry of responsibilty for self, private, and common.

    We do not have a Cultural Problem. We have a political problem because we have an incentive problem. We have an incentive problem between urban cities and suburban rural areas. And we have an inescapable problem of women’s voting in favor of irresponsibilities, and men voting infavor of responsibilities.

    The only reason anything moves left, whether education, universities, workblace behavior, political organization, or economic performance, is because women everywhere and always vote for advancing irresponsibilty – despite the fact that the reason for the west’s success (for ‘whiteness’) is the maximization of individual responsibilty – including ‘truth before face’ which woen simply cannot bear. If you pull women from the voting pool everything is always RED except for the coastal immigrant cities whose populations have natural anti-responsibilty incentives.

    In other words, we largely have a ‘women problem’ that can be solved by giving women a separate lower house of government. And restoring the Senate as a proxy for the governor and the legislature of the states.

    Understand Our Govt Step 1
    This would preserve empirical Concurrency(in agreement) – we live in a concurrent republic not a democratic one under the Common law’s empirical Commonality (in disagreement) – not sure why I have to teach this every day. The purpose of concurrency to establish legitimacy (settlement) ACROSS regions, classes (and now sexes). So that the rights of minorities are protected against the malincentives of the majority -thereby preventing majority tyranny.

    Understand Our Govt Step 2
    The USG is a Market for Exchanges Between Classes And Regions – it is for debate on invstments and trades, not rule. The states rule and the people are sovereign. In europe under the napoleonic code instead of the common law, Governments rule, the government is sovereign, and the people are subjects.

    Again. No idea why I have to teach what should be crayon level concepts to the american and european peoples every day – but then I do. Because people are evil and seek power over others so that they don’t have to work, produce, and engage in reciprocal trade. And they will like like the dickens to do so.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714719965830385664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714122208514101668

  • RT @RichardHanania: If policy was determined by polls, woke capital would’ve nev

    RT @RichardHanania: If policy was determined by polls, woke capital would’ve never been a thing. One committed billionaire can matter more…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 18:39:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714712715615199672

  • Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often

    Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often we can put them together, given the cost of doing so.

    Tickets aren’t expensive but they must at least cover the costs. We dont do these things for profit but we can’t lose money doing them.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 02:08:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714463314447597792

    Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades @NatLawInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714453154404671618

  • Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often

    Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often we can put them together, given the cost of doing so.

    Tickets aren’t expensive but they must at least cover the costs. We dont do these things for profit but we can’t lose money doing them.

    Conservatives are unfortunately not willing to support organizations with $$ unless those organizations are serving teh older demographic and are as RINO as the archaics in congress.

    We have generally done well, but our donations aren’t very good right now – probably because we don’t promote them and possibly because we reached more people on FB than here on twitter – and maybe the FB people are more likely to donate.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 02:08:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714463314338545666

  • We have the account. 1 – we dont know if we have the bandwidth. it’s very unlike

    We have the account.
    1 – we dont know if we have the bandwidth. it’s very unlikely.
    2 – we have had problems with live broadcasts before being abused, and I am extremely cautious about repeating past errors.

    Case in Point.
    Most of my personal abuse has come from sweating in the july 4th sun, at 104 degrees, while wearing canvas shorts and nylon atheltic underwear (hot) and sweating through my shorts. Then being accused of wetting myself. That video was taken by a leftist activist with the intentional purpose of undermining me and us. And the right wing losers ate it up. So you’ll understand why I’m a little shy about releasing unedited unreviewed content live.

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @NatLawInstitute @ThruTheHayes


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 01:57:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714460673307033600

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714448118945546289

  • WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MISSIONS OF GOVT Think of it this way (a) defense of all

    WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MISSIONS OF GOVT
    Think of it this way
    (a) defense of all capital of all forms
    (b) resolution of disputes of all forms
    (c) production of infrastructure that decreases the costs of real world time and space.
    (d) providing a market for the production of commons between the classes and reagions for commons other than those that decrease the real world costs of time and space.
    (e) collection of revenues for the payment of all of the above.

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 00:17:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714435559794356224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714425691180257669

  • Q: Monopolies vs Cartels, and Purpose of the different corporate structures. 1 –

    Q: Monopolies vs Cartels, and Purpose of the different corporate structures.

    1 – Why would I prefer monopolies or cartels? I don’t understand this question. While virtual monoplies do exist – usualy for a short time – a monopoly is almost impossible to sustain without state sponsorship directly or by regulatory action. A Cartel is by definition a criminal conspiracy against the itnerests of the population.

    2 – The purpose of an llc, vs a sub-s, vs a c-corp is just (a) who pays taxes and (b) who is the final authority in the organization.
    … An llc allows the centralization of responsibility independent of the scale of each investment, can distribute profits in a manner unrelated to ownership, and the tax burden to be distributed to individuals. *(if there is one)
    … A sub-s is limited in number of shareholders, has a voting structure, distributes profits according to ownership percentage, and distributes tax burden to the individuals. (if there is any).
    … A c-corp is virtually unlimited in number of sharelholdres, has a voting structure, pays taxes direction, and then distributes dividends – prodoucing double taxation.

    LLC > S-Corp > C-Corp is a natural lifecycle.
    Startups often prefer an LLC
    Self funded businesses usually prefer and S-corp
    Investors prefer a C-Corp (it’s a tax thing).

    The purpose of corporations since their inception is to produce a shield between investors and the capital they place in the business. IE: the most they can lose is their investment. Though there is a requirement for directors and exec insurance in case they do something untoward – which given the complexity of the code isn’t hard.

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 00:13:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714434614486351872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714430315018833961

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THE LAW IS THE ONLY MORAL AMBITION People have preferential am

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THE LAW IS THE ONLY MORAL AMBITION

    People have preferential ambitions. Morality is bound to an in-group; just as rationa…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:54:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714414577348219117

  • “(I don’t want to pay x) Taxes”— Well then you can leave. The truth is that it

    —“(I don’t want to pay x) Taxes”—
    Well then you can leave. The truth is that it is quite costly to produce order, rule of law, property rights, cooperative institutions at every scale, and to suppress human pervasive immorality at every sale while doing so. If you find it more costly to leave, then you are de facto saying that you prefer the current condition to the available alternatives – and of course are not able to create alternatives by yourself.

    Now, you could say that many of us are enduring economic challenges today, but that has nothing to do with fiat currency and everything to do with the 20th century and the mistakes and experiments in it, combined especially with the postwar strategy, failure to exit it, and immigration that vastly suppresses wages, combined with offshoring industsry that gutted the lower middle, working, and laboring classes.

    Rights obligations and inalienations under the natural law of individual sovereignty in display word and deed are not abitrary but necessary for competitive survival. The operating system for government is that law, a constitution to administer it, and the legislation, and regulation resulting from it.

    There is no insurer of those things other than men with weapons, delivering a just and lawful demand, under the natural and common law, for redress of grievances, carrying rope for the noose, or wood for the guillotine, and fuel for the fires. If you are not willing to insure all others as required for the reciprocal exchange of defense (insurance) of those natural, common, rights obligations and alienations, then you have no rights whatsoever than others grant you by doing so.

    This is not a philosophical statement. It is simply the science of human behavior in any condition where we are to possess the sovereignty in our demonstrated interests – reciprocal defense of that sovrereignty by force of arms, limiting us and the state to reciprocity in isplay workd and deed and markets for voluntary cooperation, mediated by the court, who suppresses all irreciprocity whether intentional or accidental.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @Nate7383 @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 17:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714337217886220289

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714327725773611397

  • CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS –“Most corporations have a negative return on investme

    CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS
    –“Most corporations have a negative return on investment when adjusting for inflation.”– @henge_j

    Well, these things are true – in part. In fact, the hard part of any business is the multipliers you produce on inflation. Your corner gas station <1%, your grocery store 1%, half of the small businesses fail (but half of them don’t and if you want to become wealthy building a small business and selling it is the most reliable way to do so. The vast majority of deca-millionaires achieve wealth by this method of small business growth), most businesses meet or beat the rate of inflation when it’s ‘normal ‘ in the 3% range.

    But that doesn’t mean that the fundamental conflict between inflation and the shortage of money, and the capacity for state debt, isn’t the fundamental problem faced by all people in history. It only means that with just over a century of experience we haven’t fully separated the treasury from the government as we have the courts, and constrained governments from effectively buying votes or donors with the power of debt.

    Now, how do we do this without currency? We do it currently with oil markets.

    There is no escape from the game of maintaining monetary velocity to maintain purchasing power (value), while at the same time maximizing possible investments in speculative search for returns on investment, especially when returns on investment continue to increase in time horizon. This means that both military competitive investment at the top, infrastructure investment, education investment, and the spectrum of industrial to consumer investments at the bottom, are necessary at all times. And it also means, quite to the dismay of the financial, isurance, pension private sector, that they provide consumers no value that wouldn’t better be provided at national scale cutting out the middleman, and providing the treasury with income.

    Here are the round numbers at scale for the USA.

    EBITDA DEFINED
    EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a financial metric that measures a company’s profitability by calculating its earnings before accounting for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, taxes, and interest payments. This is the true measure of the profitability of a business from operations. The difference between EBITA and Net Profit is the cost of money and taxation.

    EBITDA Margin Ranges by Sector, High to Low
    Software & Services:
    High: 40-50%
    Average: 30-40%
    Low: 20-30%

    Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Telecommunications:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Real Estate:
    High: 30-40%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Consumer Goods:
    High: 25-35%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Energy & Utilities:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 15-25%
    Low: 5-15%

    Financial Services:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Manufacturing & Industrial:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Transport & Logistics:
    High: 15-25%
    Average: 10-15%
    Low: 5-10%

    Retail & Wholesale:
    High: 10-20%
    Average: 5-10%
    Low: 0-5%

    EXPLANATION BY SECTOR
    Public Companies
    Indices as Indicators: The long-term performance of stock market indices like the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ often outpace inflation. For instance, the average annual return for the S&P 500 has been around 10% before inflation since its inception.
    Dividend Yields: Some mature companies might not show a high rate of growth but offer dividends that, when considered as part of total ROI, can also outpace inflation.
    Blue Chips: Established companies with stable earnings, often called “blue chips,” usually have a long track record of beating inflation.
    Market Timing: Returns can also depend heavily on market timing. Buying during a downturn and selling during an upturn can beat inflation by a significant margin.

    Small Businesses
    Survival Rates: A significant number of small businesses fail within the first few years, offering negative ROI.
    Capital Efficiency: Some small businesses require less capital up-front and can generate ROI more quickly, making it easier to outpace inflation.
    Niche Markets: Small businesses serving niche markets often have a better chance of generating high ROI, provided the niche is profitable.

    Sector-Specific
    Tech & Innovation: Industries rooted in technology and innovation have generally shown strong growth and ROI, particularly in the 21st century.
    Traditional Industries: Sectors like manufacturing or utilities often offer moderate ROI but are usually stable.
    Cyclical Industries: Sectors like real estate or commodities can provide returns that either vastly outperform or underperform inflation, depending on economic cycles.

    Global Perspective
    Emerging Markets: Countries with rapidly growing economies can offer investment opportunities with ROIs that easily outpace inflation. However, these come with high risk.
    Currency Risks: Inflation must be considered not just for the country of the investment but also against any currency risk that might negate high ROI.

    Time Frame
    Short-Term: Due to market volatility, short-term ROI may not consistently beat inflation.
    Long-Term: Historically, long-term investments have a better chance of beating inflation, as markets tend to grow over time.

    Economic Conditions
    Boom Periods: In a robust economy, more companies will likely offer an ROI that outpaces inflation.
    Recessions: During economic downturns, fewer companies will likely beat inflation, and some might even offer negative ROI.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714310598870134786

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714295243141480909