Theme: Institution

  • It’s not the short term capital they’re worried about. It’s the cultural, instit

    It’s not the short term capital they’re worried about. It’s the cultural, institutional, and genetic.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-19 12:02:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/733266507430567936

    Reply addressees: @econromesh @pmarca @johnvanreenen @FT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/733182948569055233


    IN REPLY TO:

    @econromesh

    No evidence that EU immigration does much harm to the jobs or pay of British people, @johnvanreenen @FT, #Brexit: https://t.co/0JAIY57ddP

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/733182948569055233

  • SKETCH – THE CORPORATION AND DEMOCRACY BOTH FAIL? So, if we know democracy is a

    SKETCH – THE CORPORATION AND DEMOCRACY BOTH FAIL?

    So, if we know democracy is a failed experiment in government(commons production), and a failed experiment in the economy (good and services production);

    And if we know that shareholders are not in fact owners in any sense of the word, but merely claimants on:

    (a) rapidly liquid non cash holdings of assets (store of value),

    (b) speculative growth (hedging an asset against depreciation),

    (c) dividends – when there are dividends (income), and;

    (b) the dissolution value of the asset in the cast of failure.

    And if we know that bond holders are merely an early position claimant on the income stream. And that bonds produce only defensive returns (hedging an asset against inflation).

    And if we know that corporations decreasingly control tangible assets, and are increasingly dependent upon intangible networks, in increasingly complex layers of production.

    And if we know much of this ‘scheme’ is insured by the sale of risk instruments, which do in fact protect against minor failures, but produce catastrophic chain reactions when there are systemic failures in the economy.

    Then does that mean that we can eliminate the Corporation and S-Corporation, and Double Taxation?

    5 – Political Order (The whole range)

    4 – CORP (Democracy) and S-CORP (Democracy),

    3 – LLC (Hierarchy),

    2 – Partnership(Peerage),

    1 – Personal Property (Personage).

    Why don’t we just create ‘truthful’ instruments for the modern world rather than these legally complicated dishonest instruments left over from the demonstrated failures of the industrial era of family owned companies managed by professionals, and democratic polities governed by senior members of tribes?

    If we understand we must eliminate democracies and return to private monarchies, why must we not also eliminate corporations – also democracies – and return to partnerships, with limited liability (LLC’s).

    I have seen nothing in board rooms, shareholder meetings, during my lifetime to suggest that this ridiculous experiment with democracy is anything but an overlapping set of lies we tell each other.

    I have no idea why shareholders who are too ignorant of anything have any say whatsoever, other than in court of law. I have no idea why we must push all this transparency out into public and pay all these high costs and endure all this politicking, when what we need is simply good record keeping, legal accountability and perhaps bonding of all people within an organization, and vigorous prosecution of offenders. I mean, we overly protect companies as it is. It’s not the 19th century. This is absurd.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-19 04:25:00 UTC

  • I’ve been working on legal corruption for three years. It’s not hard. The questi

    I’ve been working on legal corruption for three years. It’s not hard. The question is only why it’s not fixed.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:15:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731926053753638912

    Reply addressees: @Hromadske @JudithGoughFCO

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hromadske

    Appointment of new Ukraine’s Prosecutor General is not enough, whole office needs to be reformed – @judithgoughfco https://t.co/MSaJSEvv3i

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128

  • We (in Ukraine) are the only poor europeans remaining. Why? Our judiciary makes

    We (in Ukraine) are the only poor europeans remaining. Why? Our judiciary makes financial risk-taking impossible.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731925768163475456

    Reply addressees: @Hromadske @JudithGoughFCO

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hromadske

    Appointment of new Ukraine’s Prosecutor General is not enough, whole office needs to be reformed – @judithgoughfco https://t.co/MSaJSEvv3i

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128

  • It may take $750M to pay the judges but what’s the cost of NOT paying them? Lust

    It may take $750M to pay the judges but what’s the cost of NOT paying them? Lustration, new judges, pay them.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:13:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731925517348311040

    Reply addressees: @Hromadske @JudithGoughFCO

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hromadske

    Appointment of new Ukraine’s Prosecutor General is not enough, whole office needs to be reformed – @judithgoughfco https://t.co/MSaJSEvv3i

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128

  • When you pay judges $500-$1000 a month, you will get corruption. It’s $750M a ye

    When you pay judges $500-$1000 a month, you will get corruption. It’s $750M a year to pay the judges well enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:12:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731925341892120576

    Reply addressees: @Hromadske @JudithGoughFCO

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hromadske

    Appointment of new Ukraine’s Prosecutor General is not enough, whole office needs to be reformed – @judithgoughfco https://t.co/MSaJSEvv3i

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731908273482416128

  • The Judicial Mafia Families are equal in power to the Oligarchs, and of the thre

    The Judicial Mafia Families are equal in power to the Oligarchs, and of the three groups, politicians are weakest.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:11:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731924980859047937

    Reply addressees: @Hromadske @TarasKuzio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731910097941757952


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hromadske

    Ukraine elites keep appointing crony General Prosecutors because have no interest in Europeanizing @TarasKuzio https://t.co/WHxRcMLinA

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731910097941757952

  • EVOLUTION STARE DECISIS (PRECEDENT) AND THE COMMON LAW VS STRICT CONSTRUCTION. (

    EVOLUTION STARE DECISIS (PRECEDENT) AND THE COMMON LAW VS STRICT CONSTRUCTION.

    (important concept)

    The common law (customary law between competing courts) relies upon Precedent rather than strict construction from first principles.

    The fact that westerners practiced non-parasitism and the oath, meant that by consequence, the common law evolved to REFLECT empirical and natural law, as much as cause and perpetuate it.

    But into the colonial era, then the industrial era, under the strain of complexity and scale,

    We start out as hunter-agrarian tribes, where consensus can be formed and headmen decide disputes, to agrarian urbanism under either despotism, or democracy, where majorities decide and judges resolve disputes according to tradition, to industrial division of labor under either bureaucratic despotism, or multi-house democracy creating a market for commons between the classes reliant on assent, and layers of courts that resolve disputes according to legislation, to the present information era, where we will have corporate-state despotism, or multiple houses creating a market for commons limited only by legal dissent, and a market for courts that resolve disputes by appeal to strict construction under natural law.

    In other words, ***as we scale in population and productive complexity we increasingly transform from the use of consensus and justification of small groups of common interest, to the use of a market to calculate common interest and criticism between groups.***

    We move from majority voluntary assent to minority legal dissent.

    We move incrementally from justification to criticism: from democratic proof to natural law falsification.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 02:07:00 UTC

  • That is a far cry from your original criticism. Our courts are not good. But not

    That is a far cry from your original criticism. Our courts are not good. But not bad either.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-14 15:06:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731500948200259584

    Reply addressees: @GaltsGirl @GrossmanJoshua @pye @RightOnCrime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731496601479348227


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GaltsGirl

    @curtdoolittle Not solely, no. There is plenty wrong with our justice system, from top to bottom. @GrossmanJoshua @pye @RightOnCrime

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731496601479348227

  • MISSING LIBRARY SECTION Ramsey Mekdaschi SECTION: COMMONS Ostrom, Elinor (1990).

    MISSING LIBRARY SECTION

    Ramsey Mekdaschi

    SECTION: COMMONS

    Ostrom, Elinor (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Schroeder, Larry; Wynne, Susan (1993). Institutional incentives and sustainable development: infrastructure policies in perspective.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Walker, James; Gardner, Roy (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Walker, James (2003). Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research.

    Ostrom, Elinor (2005). Understanding institutional diversity.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Kanbur, Ravi; Guha-Khasnobis, Basudeb (2007). Linking the formal and informal economy: concepts and policies.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Hess, Charlotte (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice.

    The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs

    The Economy of Cities by Jane Jacobs

    Cities and the Wealth of Nations by Jane Jacobs

    Moral Basis of a Backward SocietyFeb 1, 1967 by Edward C. Banfield

    The Unheavenly City RevisitedNov 1, 1990 by Edward C. Banfield

    Mancur Olsen (Everything really)

    The City: A Global History by Joel Kottkin

    Tribes by Joel Kottkin

    (QUESTIONABLE)

    Segregation: A Global History of Divided Cities by Wendy Pullan.

    Urban centres across the world were built for racial separation

    The Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History, Edited by Peter Clark


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-11 04:47:00 UTC