Theme: Institution

  • FRENCH VS ANGLO CONSERVATISM French conservatism and Anglo (British and American

    FRENCH VS ANGLO CONSERVATISM
    French conservatism and Anglo (British and American) conservatism, while sharing some broad principles, differ significantly in their historical development, philosophical underpinnings, and practical applications. These differences reflect the distinct historical and cultural contexts of France, Britain, and the United States.

    1. Historical Context:

    French Conservatism: Emerged largely in response to the French Revolution and the upheaval it caused. Key figures like Joseph de Maistre and Charles Maurras emphasized order, tradition, and hierarchy. French conservatism often nostalgically looked back to the pre-revolutionary era, particularly the monarchy and the Catholic Church, as ideal models of social and political order.

    Anglo Conservatism: In Britain, conservatism evolved as a reaction to the radicalism of the French Revolution but was less reactionary than French conservatism. Figures like Edmund Burke advocated for gradual change and respected traditional institutions and practices. In America, conservatism has been more closely tied to classical liberalism, emphasizing individual liberty, limited government, and free-market principles.

    2. Philosophical Foundations:

    French Conservatism: Tends to be more ideologically rigid, with a strong emphasis on cultural and religious traditions, social hierarchy, and a powerful state. It often incorporates a sense of romanticism and nostalgia for the past.

    Anglo Conservatism: Generally pragmatic and skeptical of grand theories or ideologies. British conservatism values tradition but is also open to gradual, evolutionary change. American conservatism, while sharing these traits, places a greater emphasis on individualism and economic liberalism.

    3. Attitudes Towards the State:

    French Conservatism: Often advocates for a strong, central authority to maintain order and tradition. This aligns with a historical preference for monarchism or strong executive leadership.

    Anglo Conservatism: In Britain, there is a balance between respect for strong institutions and skepticism towards concentrated power. In the U.S., conservatism traditionally supports a limited government, emphasizing personal freedom and market-driven solutions.

    4. Economic Policies:

    French Conservatism: Has been more open to state intervention in the economy and social welfare policies, reflecting a broader acceptance of state roles in managing society.

    Anglo Conservatism: Especially in the U.S., there is a strong preference for free-market capitalism and minimal state intervention in the economy. British conservatism, while market-oriented, accepts a more significant role for the state in welfare and healthcare.

    5. Social Policies:

    French Conservatism: Often closely aligned with Catholic social teachings, emphasizing family, community, and moral order.

    Anglo Conservatism: Tends to focus on individual responsibility and moral self-regulation, with a varying degree of emphasis on religious values depending on the context (more pronounced in the U.S.).

    In summary, while both French and Anglo conservatisms value tradition and social order, French conservatism is more ideologically driven, with a romantic attachment to the past and a preference for strong state authority. Anglo conservatism, particularly in the British context, is more pragmatic and skeptical of concentrated power, balancing respect for tradition with an acceptance of gradual change. American conservatism combines these traits with a unique emphasis on individualism and economic

    Or more simply:

    —“It’s just Catholicism vs Empiricism. Joseph De Maistre vs Burke.”– @TabbyTeamster

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @CarmelloM @BOB37702515 @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 08:57:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735222362532966400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735112106226397219

  • RT @WerrellBradley: PSYCHO-POLITICAL CONTROL Our civilization is being manipulat

    RT @WerrellBradley: PSYCHO-POLITICAL CONTROL

    Our civilization is being manipulated, via its Institutions of Cultural Production, by self-s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 23:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735074447336292453

  • If academic freedom weren’t already dead, I could have put a dissertation commit

    If academic freedom weren’t already dead, I could have put a dissertation committee together at any point in my life. It’s hard enough with cross disciplinary work. But try to state a painful truth and it’s impossible to work in the academy. Which is why we work in think tanks…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 16:35:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734975432020066826

    Reply addressees: @aaronsibarium @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734762884339511627

  • (NLI Pins) For those that asked, Nathan Weins handles the Institute Pins. We’re

    (NLI Pins) For those that asked, Nathan Weins handles the Institute Pins. We’re

    (NLI Pins)
    For those that asked, Nathan Weins handles the Institute Pins. We’re discussing the next order. Will let you all know when they’re ready. 😉 We have other ‘merch’ planned as well so it’s more than just the pins we’ll plan for. https://t.co/ksOVmHVR4Q


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 16:02:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734966953544966194

  • (Institute Youtube Update) We are reorganizing our Youtube page to emphasize our

    (Institute Youtube Update)
    We are reorganizing our Youtube page to emphasize our conference speakers (too many to list), our video content producers (John Victor, Rob McMullan, etc), and our Authors (ex: Luke Weinhagen, Noah Revoy, etc).
    Breaking the fourth wall so to speak. ;)…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-12 17:42:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734629900609273976

  • Simple answer: 1) aristocracy stopped existing and funding arts 2) the nobility

    Simple answer:
    1) aristocracy stopped existing and funding arts
    2) the nobility (church) stopped existing and funding arts.
    3) the democratic state cannot select arts to fund.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 23:05:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734348681065967909

    Reply addressees: @Culture_Crit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734275158691418301

  • James Lindsay’s Suggestion for Academic Incentives Note: Given that the term sci

    James Lindsay’s Suggestion for Academic Incentives
    Note: Given that the term science is simply an application of legal testimony, our organization’s proposal is the same regardless of context, which is to use the courts to punish those who publish other than testifiable testimony (science) as doing harm to the public commons of information. This includes charges of sedition against the constitution of natural, common, concurrent law. This (a) causes academic insurance (b) creates a network outside of the academy – which will logically consist of retired academics – that profits from ‘clearing’ the academy of bias and deceit.

    LINDSAY”S SOLUTION
    via James Lindsay @ConceptualJames
    The holy has to be defended from the profane. In a Classically Liberal system that doesn’t mean existing knowledge cannot be questioned, but it does mean it has to resist subversion. Good-faith criticism and bad-faith criticism (ruthless critique) have to be distinguished.

    Academics might not even be equipped for this job, to be honest, but that made them poor guardians of the effective heart of the systems depending on their charge. We’re paying the price for this now and trying to salvage what we can before the library is burned.

    If you’re going to be the high priests of the canon of knowledge, you had damned well better be able to protect that canon’s integrity. Various incentive structures, specialization, etc., led to the academic goal being merely to ADD TO the canon of knowledge. But who defends it?

    There is actually a simple structural reform to this that is clearly necessary. Rather than granting PhDs, tenure, advancement, glory, etc., to academics merely for doing “new” research, academia must start elevating people who successfully do academic cleanup, rigorously.

    There’s a key difference between a Magisterium, which checks against orthodoxy, and what I’m saying here, though. Academia is already a poisoned Mystical Magisterium of Social Gnosticism. That’s rigor according to rationality and especially skepticism (checking against evidence).

    The Library, to use the metaphor, almost deserves to be burned because it’s rotted through with parasitical pseudo-knowledge, critical magick, outright corruption, and nonsense posing as profundity, but there’s too much wheat to burn it all as chaff. This is important.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 17:22:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734262451850342400

  • (Noah. There is an biz case for these schools and we would only have to produce

    (Noah. There is an biz case for these schools and we would only have to produce (a) charter (b) curriculum. After that the biz case (which existed when I was young in military schools – that my parents wouldn’t send me to 😉 – and we can even see it in the small private schools…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 00:27:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734006941171544537

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733917201436963123

  • RT @WerrellBradley: Gutenburg Printing Press, ~1455. Spurred The Protestant Refo

    RT @WerrellBradley: Gutenburg Printing Press, ~1455.

    Spurred The Protestant Reformation, eventually giving way to the creation of the Nati…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 15:56:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733515916543942966

  • RT @WerrellBradley: The Revolutionaries have taken all of the institutions of cu

    RT @WerrellBradley: The Revolutionaries have taken all of the institutions of cultural production, and are currently seeking to finalize th…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 15:53:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733515293924733397