Theme: Institution

  • This is correct. Yes. Civilizations, states, cultures are primitive People are o

    This is correct. Yes.
    Civilizations, states, cultures are primitive
    People are only underdeveloped.
    And even (most) primitive cultures can with the right institutions develop.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 20:51:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736851754782724519

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen @ThruTheHayes @Raytional

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736820720452112687

  • ~~”Modern States Produce Nether High Culture, Arts, or Monuments – the free mark

    ~~”Modern States Produce Nether High Culture, Arts, or Monuments – the free market can’t.”~~ Paraphrase

    (via Martin Stepan (@AutistocratMS) and Raw Egg Nationalist (@BabyGravy9))

    Well that’s obvious, because while funding monuments requires markets, the temporal incentives of market actors are different from the intergenerational incentives of aristocracy and nobility. In that sense, yest, modern economic states are sort of degenerate.

    I think it’s more important to acknowledge the free market existed wherever monuments existed – that’s what made them possible – and to state that its aristocracy (state) and nobility (church) that were superior to democratic states in the production of intergenerational monuments and arts – because as #Hoppe stated, commercial entities are renters of the political order while aristocracy and nobility are the owners of it. So these outcomes are predictable.

    We can deprive the democratic state from engaging in these matters, and restore the aristocracy in provision of them relatively easily. I don’t think the market has much to do with high culture, art, and monuments.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @NWEurasian


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 17:26:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736800090973405184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736789992418984072

  • (FOR UK FRIENDS, FOLLOWERS, AND LURKERS) Ian, who is about my age, (but much cal

    (FOR UK FRIENDS, FOLLOWERS, AND LURKERS)
    Ian, who is about my age, (but much calmer, and gentler) and has been with us for a long time, would like to start a UK chapter of the institute, from what I understand, so that we can form a community and hold conferences there – and hopefully eventually begin activism there.

    Please PM Ian (@Baltika3), Brandon (@ThruTheHayes), or me (@curtdoolittle) to express your interest.

    There no mindfulness like the mindfulness of understanding everything. πŸ˜‰
    #uk

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 16:38:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736788109184876544

  • Hmmm…. I’d have to see the criteria for ‘rule of law’ because I think this is

    Hmmm…. I’d have to see the criteria for ‘rule of law’ because I think this is measuring the culture of the polity not the institutions or the law.

    The more important questions are ‘what’s sovereign’ in each country’s legal system? And what as such what limits are on the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-17 01:15:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736193476952281281

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736004271525773369

  • (thanks GC) @vvphilo Using Twitter brevity. 1) as we include each ‘class’ into t

    (thanks GC)
    @vvphilo
    Using Twitter brevity.
    1) as we include each ‘class’ into the society (norms, traditions, religion), economy, and polity (voice, voting, politicians), each class is forced to adapt to the metaphysical foundations of our civilization (maximization of individual responsibilty for private and common) – and each class instead, resists, and seeks privileges rather than fully integrates.

    2) We have seen this same problem with the classes as Aristocracy (conquerors, order, state) > Common folk (Organized Religion) > Middle class (resetoration of european trade, enlightenment) > working class (industrial revolution, leftism) > women (feminism, postwar economy, amplified leftism) > immigrants (anti-male, anti-white, neo-marxism, postmodernism, woke).

    3) All differences in behavior are due to (a) sex differences in perception and cognition, (b) evolution (neoteny) (c) genentic load (class) (d) accumulation of a,b,c in ethnic groups (races, subraces, etc). However, the origins of all differences in behavior is sex differences. In sex differences we find:

    MALE VS FEMALE
    Predator vs Prey
    Safety vs Security
    Over-Time vs In-Time
    Systematizing vs Empathizing
    Status via Hyper Capitalizing vs by Hyper Consuming
    Seeking Responsibility & Risk vs Evading Responsibilty & Risk
    Loyalty Over Time vs Devotion In Time

    4) The male strategy of capitalization (consequences) despite the costs vs The female strategy of hyperconsumption regardless of consequences (costs).
    This means that the feminine strategy, combined with adding women to the polity, is the first time we have had a hostile, anti-civilizational demographic, opposing western maximization of individual responsibility (‘Whiteness’) added to the economy and polity.
    Worse, the only female intellectuals are the ashkenazim, who invented the entire marxist sequence of marxism, Leninism (the american left), neoMarxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism(anti-truth marxism), anti-middle class neoconservatism (soviet anti-aristocratic libertarianism), anti-male and anti-family feminism, anti-white and anti white male woke. And we have added them to the polity, academy, media, and state by favoring postwar credentialism instead of demonstrated competency in the production of multi-generational nobility, industrial production, or military service – meaning people with demonstrated success in the exercise of and fostering of, individual responsibilty.

    5) Sex diffferences are expressed in antisocial behavior as well as all other aspects of behavior. in almost all cases the female antisocial behavior is devoted to advancing consumption and evading responsibility and claiming it’s moral obligation to care – instead of treason, sedition, undermining, theft, fraud, parasitism, and free riding. We see this in the female and jewish and now immigrant use of female tactics of distracting from their crimes, and evading the truth, in order to evade responsibiity or obtaining their wants by trade (usually by behavioral modification) by generating conflict by by “Gossping, shaming, rallying, obscuring, loading, framing, psychologizing, moralizing, denying and lying”. (I cover the female, jewish, marxist-sequence method of lying in my (our) work in excruciating detail … as well as the male that we are familiarl with.

    6) while we have successfully suppressed most male antisocial, anti-economic, anti-political behavior: the direct physical: violece, theft, and some fraud – we have not suppressed the female method of antisocial,anti-economic and anti-political behavior: the destruction of the information system, placing face betfore truth, social construction of falsehoods, impossiblities, and mythos of oppression (they’re being domesticated into responsibilty not oppressed) and infantilizing the population as a consequence – creating the present crisis. And in doign so generating demand for their authoritarianism (Leninism).

    7) As such we have not outlawed the feminine methods of criminality as thorougly as we have outlawed the male methods of criminality – despite that these female behaviors were in the english common law, and the germanic law, as far back as we are aware of laws. And It turns out that we can outlaw these behaviors, and it’s not terribly difficult to do so, once you understand ‘all of it is lying and stealing and fraud’.

    8) Ergo our mission is reducible to (a) truth is enough, (b) the intergenerational family not the individual is the purpose of public policy, and (c) let a thousand nations bloom because we require different policy (commons) to accomodate the needs of people who are at, and because of their demographics, are only capable of, obedience to informal and formal institutions within the limit of their ability to comprehend and bear responsibility.

    9) As such our organization has produce the largest set of reforms since those of the Roman reforms, and for the same purpose as the roman reforms: to prevent civil war made possible by the elevation of classes into participation into society, economy, and polity.

    10) These reforms begin with completing our natural (scientifc) common (scientific), concurrent (scientific) law. Plugging the approximately eight holes in the constitution that allow the abuses foisted upon us in both private and publics spheres. Reverting power back to the states to restore responsibility accuntability and the market for policy and polities. Reforming legislation, education, the financial sector, consumer protection, and even our geostrategy. Too much to list here, and in extraordinary detail (we are operationalists, meaning strict constructionists, meaning we have made it very difficult for people both private and public to continue to prey upon our people.

    We do our work live and in public so it is visible in it’s working state – which doesn’t mean it’s organized, complete, or easy to comprehend. But it’s deep, profound, and rock solid.
    And there is no equivalent of it outside of the founding fathers’ work on the declaration and constitution.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @diegocaleiro @vvphilo @ThruTheHayes


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-16 18:32:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736092047142977536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736076378666307968

  • Rights are a Service We Construct with Institutions Both Formal and Informal

    Rights are a Service We Construct with Institutions Both Formal and Informal. https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1735813490512699676

  • Rights are a Service We Construct with Institutions Both Formal and Informal

    Rights are a Service We Construct with Institutions Both Formal and Informal.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-16 17:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736073249203617792

  • People always organize by tacit agreement. Everywhere

    People always organize by tacit agreement. Everywhere.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-15 14:06:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735662509305000348

    Reply addressees: @dicktoles88 @Areez22 @aldafa_ir @GRACE__O_MALLEY @realrenergy @NatLawInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735654996392153389

  • The team is working on it right now. We are producing a charter for local chapte

    The team is working on it right now. We are producing a charter for local chapters.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 17:53:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735357243103601005

    Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8 @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735349233329271056

  • “You aren’t broken. Our civilization, it’s institutions, our information system

    –“You aren’t broken. Our civilization, it’s institutions, our information system (education, media), and social order are broken. But we can fix them – more easily that you’d think.”– Brandon Hayes ( @ThruTheHayes )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 16:14:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735332370587234447