Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • Trial By Combat And Trial By Ordeal

    Actually, there are two fantastic (and scientific) reasons for trial by combat and ordeal, that contradict your implications. They are (a) clear demonstration to the community of the veracity of one’s word, (b) warranty of one’s word with one’s life, and (c) an honorable death in the case of one’s guilt. Trial by ordeal is a form of voluntary submission to a torture to the degree that the community no longer holds doubt. “One’s word” in the germanic tradition, certainly back to the Yamnaya was one’s life. And the means of transitioning into male adulthood was The Oath. And the Oath was very simply, do not lie, do not steal, and do show cowardice in battle. Simple rules produce complex outcomes. The trust of our ancient peoples has been undermined by familiarity with abrahamic modernity.

  • TRIAL BY COMBAT AND TRIAL BY ORDEAL Actually, there are two fantastic (and scien

    TRIAL BY COMBAT AND TRIAL BY ORDEAL

    Actually, there are two fantastic (and scientific) reasons for trial by combat and ordeal, that contradict your implications.

    They are (a) clear demonstration to the community of the veracity of one’s word, (b) warranty of one’s word with one’s life, and (c) an honorable death in the case of one’s guilt.

    Trial by ordeal is a form of voluntary submission to a torture to the degree that the community no longer holds doubt.

    “One’s word” in the germanic tradition, certainly back to the Yamnaya was one’s life. And the means of transitioning into male adulthood was The Oath. And the Oath was very simply, do not lie, do not steal, and do show cowardice in battle.

    Simple rules produce complex outcomes.

    The trust of our ancient peoples has been undermined by familiarity with abrahamic modernity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-11 07:57:00 UTC

  • by James Santagata Google’s in for a wild-ride…. 1. Class action lawsuit by co

    by James Santagata Google’s in for a wild-ride…. 1. Class action lawsuit by conservative men claiming discrimination partly by claiming women engineers are not as good as male engineers. Google counter claims they are just as good if not better than males (they have stated that). Which leads to #2.. 2. Class action lawsuit by women engineers based on the fact that they are far underpaid what the male engineers make and that Google itself has said in #1 above the the women are just as good or better. 3. Caving in to Chinese Govt and letting Chinese market go — the market share lost is not just market share lost but revenues and those revenues are ammunition, now being accumulated by the Chinese Internet Giants. They are getting better and more internationalized management and they are looking beyond their markets. Jack Ma is just the most visible. 4. Continuing click fraud issues. and….. wait for it…. 5. Google deemed either a monopoly and broken up with the Sherman Act or categorized as a utility and managed as such – think your local gas company or first broken up as a monopoly and then the remnants of import, categorized as a utility. The one thing in Google’s favor is that is it Deep State Funded, so the NSA, CIA and others will go to bat for Google to prevent any breakup that would stop their one-stop, real time data and packet feeds from Google as well as the 360 degree profiles provided. On the side of the Anti-Deep State looking to dismantle it.

  • by James Santagata Google’s in for a wild-ride…. 1. Class action lawsuit by co

    by James Santagata Google’s in for a wild-ride…. 1. Class action lawsuit by conservative men claiming discrimination partly by claiming women engineers are not as good as male engineers. Google counter claims they are just as good if not better than males (they have stated that). Which leads to #2.. 2. Class action lawsuit by women engineers based on the fact that they are far underpaid what the male engineers make and that Google itself has said in #1 above the the women are just as good or better. 3. Caving in to Chinese Govt and letting Chinese market go — the market share lost is not just market share lost but revenues and those revenues are ammunition, now being accumulated by the Chinese Internet Giants. They are getting better and more internationalized management and they are looking beyond their markets. Jack Ma is just the most visible. 4. Continuing click fraud issues. and….. wait for it…. 5. Google deemed either a monopoly and broken up with the Sherman Act or categorized as a utility and managed as such – think your local gas company or first broken up as a monopoly and then the remnants of import, categorized as a utility. The one thing in Google’s favor is that is it Deep State Funded, so the NSA, CIA and others will go to bat for Google to prevent any breakup that would stop their one-stop, real time data and packet feeds from Google as well as the 360 degree profiles provided. On the side of the Anti-Deep State looking to dismantle it.

  • by James Santagata Google’s in for a wild-ride…. 1. Class action lawsuit by co

    by James Santagata

    Google’s in for a wild-ride….

    1. Class action lawsuit by conservative men claiming discrimination partly by claiming women engineers are not as good as male engineers. Google counter claims they are just as good if not better than males (they have stated that).

    Which leads to #2..

    2. Class action lawsuit by women engineers based on the fact that they are far underpaid what the male engineers make and that Google itself has said in #1 above the the women are just as good or better.

    3. Caving in to Chinese Govt and letting Chinese market go — the market share lost is not just market share lost but revenues and those revenues are ammunition, now being accumulated by the Chinese Internet Giants. They are getting better and more internationalized management and they are looking beyond their markets. Jack Ma is just the most visible.

    4. Continuing click fraud issues.

    and….. wait for it….

    5. Google deemed either a monopoly and broken up with the Sherman Act or categorized as a utility and managed as such – think your local gas company or first broken up as a monopoly and then the remnants of import, categorized as a utility.

    The one thing in Google’s favor is that is it Deep State Funded, so the NSA, CIA and others will go to bat for Google to prevent any breakup that would stop their one-stop, real time data and packet feeds from Google as well as the 360 degree profiles provided.

    On the side of the Anti-Deep State looking to dismantle it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-08 20:39:00 UTC

  • Monarchy, Corporation, And Cult. Choose Your Mix.

    Monarchy has been the default and most durable form of existing government (fact) – kinship or near kinship rule. The jury is in and monarchies were superior to democracy. (Although that’s been known since before Plato wrote it down. The reason he wrote the republic was because it was clear that the experiment in democracy had failed.) There are really only three choices of rule: 1 – Kin(Monarchy-Aristocracy-Violence), 2 – Corporation(Committee-Bureaucracy-Payment), and 3 – Cult(priesthood-cult-gossip/inclusion/exclusion.) And all civilizations make use of some combination in some priority. Generally it’s been Kin(wealth) -> Corporation(industry) <- Cult(Poverty). The american experiment was Kin->Corporation->Cult In the modern world it’s Cult ->Corporation->Kin. Iran is trying to restore Cult->Kin->Corporation. You can describe any culture by that priority stack. The lesson of tripartism (Classes) is 1 – Monarchy: Kin-Judicial-Martial Paternal. 2 – Corporation: Universal – Commercial – Ascendant Male 3 – Cult: universal-supernatural-Maternal Ponder that for a bit.

  • Monarchy, Corporation, And Cult. Choose Your Mix.

    Monarchy has been the default and most durable form of existing government (fact) – kinship or near kinship rule. The jury is in and monarchies were superior to democracy. (Although that’s been known since before Plato wrote it down. The reason he wrote the republic was because it was clear that the experiment in democracy had failed.) There are really only three choices of rule: 1 – Kin(Monarchy-Aristocracy-Violence), 2 – Corporation(Committee-Bureaucracy-Payment), and 3 – Cult(priesthood-cult-gossip/inclusion/exclusion.) And all civilizations make use of some combination in some priority. Generally it’s been Kin(wealth) -> Corporation(industry) <- Cult(Poverty). The american experiment was Kin->Corporation->Cult In the modern world it’s Cult ->Corporation->Kin. Iran is trying to restore Cult->Kin->Corporation. You can describe any culture by that priority stack. The lesson of tripartism (Classes) is 1 – Monarchy: Kin-Judicial-Martial Paternal. 2 – Corporation: Universal – Commercial – Ascendant Male 3 – Cult: universal-supernatural-Maternal Ponder that for a bit.

  • MONARCHY, CORPORATION, AND CULT. CHOOSE YOUR MIX. Monarchy has been the default

    MONARCHY, CORPORATION, AND CULT. CHOOSE YOUR MIX.

    Monarchy has been the default and most durable form of existing government (fact) – kinship or near kinship rule.

    The jury is in and monarchies were superior to democracy. (Although that’s been known since before Plato wrote it down. The reason he wrote the republic was because it was clear that the experiment in democracy had failed.)

    There are really only three choices of rule:

    1 – Kin(Monarchy-Aristocracy-Violence),

    2 – Corporation(Committee-Bureaucracy-Payment), and

    3 – Cult(priesthood-cult-gossip/inclusion/exclusion.)

    And all civilizations make use of some combination in some priority.

    Generally it’s been Kin(wealth) -> Corporation(industry) <- Cult(Poverty).

    The american experiment was Kin->Corporation->Cult

    In the modern world it’s Cult ->Corporation->Kin.

    Iran is trying to restore Cult->Kin->Corporation.

    You can describe any culture by that priority stack.

    The lesson of tripartism (Classes) is

    1 – Monarchy: Kin-Judicial-Martial Paternal.

    2 – Corporation: Universal – Commercial – Ascendant Male

    3 – Cult: universal-supernatural-Maternal

    Ponder that for a bit.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-07 11:08:00 UTC

  • From Twitter. Kyle Henry Sees A Pattern In History

    —“A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.”—@KyleHen44723716 1) Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now. 2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments. 3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.

  • From Twitter. Kyle Henry Sees A Pattern In History

    —“A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.”—@KyleHen44723716 1) Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now. 2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments. 3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.