—“Sovereignty is not something you give away to others, it’s something you practice. If peers practice equivalent sovereignty, institutions emerge between you so that in practice, you respect the sovereignty of others. But nobody rides for free.”—Simon Ström
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 09:59:00 UTC
You can’t really. We all pursue what we understand. The young and powerless male can only conceive of simplistic solutions that he can imagine. The idea of producing institutional solutions is too ‘boring’, when fantasies provide cheaper and more ready emotional stimulation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 00:20:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009229468924284928
Reply addressees: @bottomtextpunk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009225429755006977
IN REPLY TO:
@bottomtextpunk
@curtdoolittle A person I know, he falls into all those categories. He was heavily into Propertarianism until he got sucked into NeoAbsolutism, which now he regards it to be superior to all other theories. How do we fix him
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009225429755006977
Every movement starts as fringe, and edgy, attracting novelty junkies, dysfunctionals, rebels, and malcontents. And if it has any meat to it, increasingly upgrades from edge cases to some position in the hierarchy of argumentative structures that we call ideologies, philosophies, and institutional models. What we should expect to see, as we move up this hierarchy, is the exit of early entrants, and expansion of late entrants increasingly closer to the mainstream. The edge does the research but stays the edge. Utility is obtained, and as a consequence power is either obtained or not.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 19:49:00 UTC
PERCENT OF CRIMES SOLVED? About 55% in Germany About 35% in the USA About 28% in the UK AI can’t find reliable stats on Australia, but burglary is generally a good proxy for overall crime closure and that means Aussies = USA in criminal closure. I can’t find data on France but Muslims account for 70% of prisoners. Germany can’t give accurate figures because nine Muslim families control so much organized crime and so little is reported, that it’s worse than the Italian mafia during prohibition. (remember prohibition was enacted by protestants to control the behavior of catholics – the underclasses.)
PERCENT OF CRIMES SOLVED? About 55% in Germany About 35% in the USA About 28% in the UK AI can’t find reliable stats on Australia, but burglary is generally a good proxy for overall crime closure and that means Aussies = USA in criminal closure. I can’t find data on France but Muslims account for 70% of prisoners. Germany can’t give accurate figures because nine Muslim families control so much organized crime and so little is reported, that it’s worse than the Italian mafia during prohibition. (remember prohibition was enacted by protestants to control the behavior of catholics – the underclasses.)
PERCENT OF CRIMES SOLVED?
About 55% in Germany
About 35% in the USA
About 28% in the UK
AI can’t find reliable stats on Australia, but burglary is generally a good proxy for overall crime closure and that means Aussies = USA in criminal closure.
I can’t find data on France but Muslims account for 70% of prisoners.
Germany can’t give accurate figures because nine Muslim families control so much organized crime and so little is reported, that it’s worse than the Italian mafia during prohibition. (remember prohibition was enacted by protestants to control the behavior of catholics – the underclasses.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 08:04:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/your_posts/35523572_10156436024792264_6576688205511262208_n_10156436024787264.jpg “INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”Günther Shroomachersmart contracts aren’t the same?Jun 18, 2018 3:21pmNick ZitoThere seems to be a close resemblance as I see it through my logic.
I have attempted to get Curt to cover smart contracts as relating to developing an efficient and ‘operational’ means of distributing a basic income but never received a response.
Can smart contracts cover the entire spectrum of due diligence when performing testimonlialsim? I think that would be a good starting point.Jun 19, 2018 9:07amCurt DoolittleyesJun 19, 2018 9:12amCurt DoolittleAlthough, smart contracts as currently constructed are not structured strictly enough.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amNick ZitoI agree. I think they are also currently too simplistic to perform the functions required to cover the scope of Propertariansim and Testimonialism.
I also think this scientific realism is already out of reach for most in terms of understanding and practice that by introducing actual coded forms of Propertariansim and Testimonliasm (law & ethics) is probably still far off any practical use. However, it does seem the logical step in development and implementation.Jun 19, 2018 9:20am”INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 15:19:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35523572_10156436024792264_6576688205511262208_n_10156436024787264.jpg “INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”Günther Shroomachersmart contracts aren’t the same?Jun 18, 2018 3:21pmNick ZitoThere seems to be a close resemblance as I see it through my logic.
I have attempted to get Curt to cover smart contracts as relating to developing an efficient and ‘operational’ means of distributing a basic income but never received a response.
Can smart contracts cover the entire spectrum of due diligence when performing testimonlialsim? I think that would be a good starting point.Jun 19, 2018 9:07amCurt DoolittleyesJun 19, 2018 9:12amCurt DoolittleAlthough, smart contracts as currently constructed are not structured strictly enough.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amNick ZitoI agree. I think they are also currently too simplistic to perform the functions required to cover the scope of Propertariansim and Testimonialism.
I also think this scientific realism is already out of reach for most in terms of understanding and practice that by introducing actual coded forms of Propertariansim and Testimonliasm (law & ethics) is probably still far off any practical use. However, it does seem the logical step in development and implementation.Jun 19, 2018 9:20am”INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 15:19:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle
Tech has skin in the game. Media doesn’t.
Tech has credibility. Media doesn’t.
Tech is idealistic. So is Media.
Tech is egoistic. So is Media.
Tech is optimistic. Media is pessimistic.
We’re are going to solve both problems at once.
With Free Truthful Speech, and Warranty of Your Speech, and Restitution plus Punishment for False Speech.
The century of propaganda is ended.
No more gossip and lies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 12:29:00 UTC
—Everything which makes man not-animal (language, society, institutions.etc) are proxies for violence. Once this pill had been swallowed, a whole universe of concepts fall into place and a few critical lies are seen as obviously false.”— Bill Joslin
(elegant)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 18:32:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008417217824903170