Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • In a coffee shop. Had to tell two typical self centered millennial teens working

    In a coffee shop. Had to tell two typical self centered millennial teens working the place that ‘this isn’t your living room it’s a place of business, and you’re both too loud and sharing what you shouldn’t”.

    Girl ok, apologizes. Non-hetero male – huff-and-puff storm.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 21:17:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009908290267090951

  • The only tax I care you pay is FULL INTEGRATION

    The only tax I care you pay is FULL INTEGRATION.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 19:48:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009885686932082688

  • We Can Afford to Separate, Specialize, and Speciate

    Just as one of our favorite pundits explains that as we become more wealthy, and institutionally and economically equal, we tend rather dramatically to increase our gender bias expressions – also, in all cases, as we become wealthier, we seek to explore our differences and reinforce them rather than pay the cost of adaptation to a norm. Most conservative liberal conflict is over this difference in conservatives paying costs to conform vs liberals consuming to experiment or explore. With liberals objecting to paying for costs they don’t want to pay directly, and conservatives objective to absorbing costs of liberal consumption and experimentation. Now, there are two choices: conservatives oppress liberals, or liberals oppress conservatives, or we separate, specialize and speciate. In other words, somewhere around 3500 years ago we slowed speciation. In the 20th century the left has attempted to reverse it. And they are succeeding – with horridly dysgenic results. But with very little effort we can now AFFORD to return to speciation. Fortunately, this is great for conservatives who are naturally eugenic, and great for liberals in the short term who are naturally dysgenic. But in the end it means we will, in the aggregate, return to white and east asian excellence and everything between us will once again decline – until they pose a threat to us out of necessity and envy. Time to return to speciation.

  • We Can Afford to Separate, Specialize, and Speciate

    Just as one of our favorite pundits explains that as we become more wealthy, and institutionally and economically equal, we tend rather dramatically to increase our gender bias expressions – also, in all cases, as we become wealthier, we seek to explore our differences and reinforce them rather than pay the cost of adaptation to a norm. Most conservative liberal conflict is over this difference in conservatives paying costs to conform vs liberals consuming to experiment or explore. With liberals objecting to paying for costs they don’t want to pay directly, and conservatives objective to absorbing costs of liberal consumption and experimentation. Now, there are two choices: conservatives oppress liberals, or liberals oppress conservatives, or we separate, specialize and speciate. In other words, somewhere around 3500 years ago we slowed speciation. In the 20th century the left has attempted to reverse it. And they are succeeding – with horridly dysgenic results. But with very little effort we can now AFFORD to return to speciation. Fortunately, this is great for conservatives who are naturally eugenic, and great for liberals in the short term who are naturally dysgenic. But in the end it means we will, in the aggregate, return to white and east asian excellence and everything between us will once again decline – until they pose a threat to us out of necessity and envy. Time to return to speciation.

  • It Failed Everywhere Else, so….

    (((They))) have this strange intuition that what failed in the levant, and has failed everywhere else, will succeed in the west, if (((They))) only remove territorial, normative, and genetic barriers.

  • It Failed Everywhere Else, so….

    (((They))) have this strange intuition that what failed in the levant, and has failed everywhere else, will succeed in the west, if (((They))) only remove territorial, normative, and genetic barriers.

  • Sovereignty is something you practice.

    —“Sovereignty is not something you give away to others, it’s something you practice. If peers practice equivalent sovereignty, institutions emerge between you so that in practice, you respect the sovereignty of others. But nobody rides for free.”—Simon Ström

  • Sovereignty is something you practice.

    —“Sovereignty is not something you give away to others, it’s something you practice. If peers practice equivalent sovereignty, institutions emerge between you so that in practice, you respect the sovereignty of others. But nobody rides for free.”—Simon Ström

  • “Sovereignty is not something you give away to others, it’s something you practi

    —“Sovereignty is not something you give away to others, it’s something you practice. If peers practice equivalent sovereignty, institutions emerge between you so that in practice, you respect the sovereignty of others. But nobody rides for free.”—Simon Ström

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 13:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009435518579462149

  • When we try to understand early society in Scandinavia it is obvious that it was

    When we try to understand early society in Scandinavia it is obvious that it was decisive for an individual to be part of a family and a social group. You were in a way identified by your affiliation to a family, a group and a society.

    The worst punishment you could thus get was to be cut off from this group and society, to be excommunicated or outlawed, which has been described as a ‘social death.’

    In other words we can see that our forefathers had another concept of freedom than we have. Freedom was not defined as an individual freedom, but a right to belong to a fellowship, to be part of a social group. A stranger was often considered as an enemy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 10:05:00 UTC