—“If police investigations were run by capitalist philosophy, would the poor get adequate justice?”— THE CORRECT ANSWER Police investigations already are capitalistic. They balance the market for tolerance with crime rates with the market for taxes to pay for the suppression, prosecution, and punishment of crimes. The cost of the externalities of physical crimes are far smaller than the cost of the externalities of clerical and informational crime. The distrust produced by physical crime is greater than the distrust created by clerical and informational crime. The problem for the poor is that they have worse ABILITIES and worse PERSONALITIES, and even worse HABITS than their working, middle, and upper class peers, and therefore low sexual, social, economic, and political value to other people. Hence, they are poor. They have nothing to trade. And worse, even interacting with them forces others to bear the cost of doing so. We ended the period of stagnant human capital by the middle of the last century. That is why IQ’s are declining. We are now reversing gains of modernity by increasing the rates of reproduction of the underclasses by suppressing the rates of reproduction of the middle classes through tax extraction.
Theme: Institution
-
What About Capitalist Police?
—“If police investigations were run by capitalist philosophy, would the poor get adequate justice?”— THE CORRECT ANSWER Police investigations already are capitalistic. They balance the market for tolerance with crime rates with the market for taxes to pay for the suppression, prosecution, and punishment of crimes. The cost of the externalities of physical crimes are far smaller than the cost of the externalities of clerical and informational crime. The distrust produced by physical crime is greater than the distrust created by clerical and informational crime. The problem for the poor is that they have worse ABILITIES and worse PERSONALITIES, and even worse HABITS than their working, middle, and upper class peers, and therefore low sexual, social, economic, and political value to other people. Hence, they are poor. They have nothing to trade. And worse, even interacting with them forces others to bear the cost of doing so. We ended the period of stagnant human capital by the middle of the last century. That is why IQ’s are declining. We are now reversing gains of modernity by increasing the rates of reproduction of the underclasses by suppressing the rates of reproduction of the middle classes through tax extraction.
-
No Professional Parasites
It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for two thousand years: (a) no professional priests, (b) no professional politicians (c) no monopoly bureaucracy, and therefore no insulation from the market. Add (d) full accountability for the truthfulness of public speech by involuntary warranty of consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, rationality, reciprocity, and full accounting.
-
No Professional Parasites
It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for two thousand years: (a) no professional priests, (b) no professional politicians (c) no monopoly bureaucracy, and therefore no insulation from the market. Add (d) full accountability for the truthfulness of public speech by involuntary warranty of consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, rationality, reciprocity, and full accounting.
-
Let me help you. A TEMPLE was a BANK. That’s why. Sep 1, 2018, 7:34 AM
https://www.ancient.eu/article/974/banking-in-the-roman-world/Again. Let me help you. A TEMPLE was a BANK. That’s why.
https://www.ancient.eu/article/974/banking-in-the-roman-world/Updated Sep 1, 2018, 7:34 AM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:52:00 UTC
-
ON MANNERBUND I agree with the ‘sentiment’ of the Mannerbund narrative, but I ex
ON MANNERBUND
I agree with the ‘sentiment’ of the Mannerbund narrative, but I express it as ‘it all begins with the militia’, and the militia functions on the brotherhood of warriors. I disagree with the Social Matters / Mannerbund in that the fact that our civilization begins there, does not mean it is SUFFICIENT to defeat enemies, or that much can be made of that ‘feeling’ alone. What binds people are incentive to bind with one another.
Many of you are seeking the sense of safety and power in the pack and the restoration of our institutions of brotherhood throughout society due to the intentional destruction of them by the deconstructionists in marxism, femininsm, postmodernism, who exploit a ready willingness in our female population to defect by sh-t testing us.
But you are making the mistake of an intuitionistic bias that is VERY RARE, instead of providing MAJOR incentives (military, political, economic, personal wealth, agency, status, and a plan to get there you are searching in the dark for emotional support, rallying without resources to do so.
Those institutions of brotherhood are the last good we will achieve, not the first. They are a premium achieved for having worked to obtain military, political, economic, wealth, status benefits.
Men will REPORT affiliation for sentiments.
Men will DEMONSTRATE conviction for material rewards.
The feeling of safety of the pack comes only from the shared experience of working as a pack to produce an outcome which provides an alternative to the present, yet promises only chaos because of an ABSENCE OF VISION.
I do not operate from your perspective but work backward to achieve that emotion through demonstrated action together by the use of incentives to achieve material success.
The answer to our problem is to provide an actionable plan the end result is mannerbund.
That actionable plan is a means of altering the status quo such that POSSIBLE demands are met.
One does not defeat a fortress by direct attack, but by starving it. One does not threaten potential allies but pays them off. One does not create incentives for defenders of the fortress by promises of suffering, but promising them returns.
Once the fortress is won, the holdouts must be flayed and salted and hung from the walls for their crimes.
All revolutions are suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect.
It’s time to win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:16:00 UTC
-
“Here’s how a typical speeding ticket (in this case a ticket from Indiana that w
—“Here’s how a typical speeding ticket (in this case a ticket from Indiana that we paid though our Traffic Justice Program) is divvied up:
State Courts: $49.00
County Courts: $18.90
City… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289059141690983&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 17:41:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035583481919811589
-
NO. ROME HAD NO ‘PRIESTS’ AS WE UNDERSTAND IT 1) “Priests” had no doctrine only
NO. ROME HAD NO ‘PRIESTS’ AS WE UNDERSTAND IT
1) “Priests” had no doctrine only obligatory rituals (the japanese ritual model). The monarchy originally performed the rituals, then appointed… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289030081693889&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 16:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035557894564065281
-
3) A professional priesthood in the sense I use it (education in doctrine under
3) A professional priesthood in the sense I use it (education in doctrine under pretense of divine authority) as a competitor to the state (see Huntington’s history mesopotamia) rather than archetypes and anthropomorphic instantiations of nature, was an import.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 15:52:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035555881214267392
Reply addressees: @ZeusHypatos
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035547155963027456
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035547155963027456
-
2) To equate “the performance of ritual”, when it was not required they even und
2) To equate “the performance of ritual”, when it was not required they even understand the words they spoke, only that they performed the ritual precisely, with ‘priesthood’ as ‘a competitor to the state’ or means of state sponsored deception, is more than a mischaracterization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 15:49:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035555153594789888
Reply addressees: @ZeusHypatos
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035547155963027456
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035547155963027456