Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A PRODUCT OF ITS ORIGINS, BUT OF ITS TRANSFORMATION INTO GER

    CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A PRODUCT OF ITS ORIGINS, BUT OF ITS TRANSFORMATION INTO GERMANICIZED FOLK RELIGION – RE-INSTITUTIONALIZED UNDER COLONIALISM.

    —-…”a concept is not best understood in light of its origins, but rather in light of the direction in which the tradition is moving. To take Christianity as a notorious example: I do not believe that the truth of Christianity will best be elucidated by a search for its origins, but rather by an observation of its development in tradition. This approach is a reversal of the assumption that has dominated Christian and much other religious scholarship for a very long time, an assumption characterized by the genetic fallacy: that the true meaning of a word—or of an idea—lies in its pristine state.48″—-

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 22:42:00 UTC

  • INCARCERATION RATES IN CONTEXT OF TIME AND PLACE There is a reason we are {a hig

    INCARCERATION RATES IN CONTEXT OF TIME AND PLACE

    There is a reason we are {a high trust society, a prosperous society, a ‘diverse’ society, a rule of law society, and a high incarceration society}. While we might question the utility of imprisoning people over some drug use, we do not have levels of petty crime endemic to european countries, as well as the pervasive crime that troubles the rest of the world. And the violent crime we have is {drug related, race-restricted, and race-location-restricted} because proximity creates hostility.

    So, in other words, the cost of preservation of our relatively superior condition is high rates of incarceration, and the subsequent increased risk those who have been incarcerated face, and the subsequent grouping-together, and monitoring of those what have been incarcerated with those who are at risk, into areas that can be monitored.

    If we were to secede into racially exclusive and racially heterogeneous polities, then we would, as a consequence, also secede into high trust, high income, high commons, low crime polities, and lower trust, poorer, low commons, lower crime polities. Because groups would produce appropriate signals, behavior, manners, ethics, morals, commons, policies, and laws – and only enforce those laws suitable for their populations.

    White crime in america is not dissimilar from white europe. Although white under, lower, and working class intermixture with the non-white underclasses is causing defection from the middle class values we have spent 1500 years developing, and degeneration of those whites is accelerating.

    The data is what it is: we have lower testosterone in white groups, and greater neoteny (we mature more slowly), and higher IQ distributions, and testosterone and rapid maturity and lower IQ distributions create demand for more criminal behavior. East asians have lower demand for stimulation and lower demand for identity expression (greater conformity). This is because we have selected for heroism and identity, and they for harmony and conformity for all of known history. So we see as good or better performance from east asians as we do from our own. Strangely, Latinos have similar levels of testosterone, slightly lower neoteny, but still lower distributions of IQ, so their excessive criminality is due to only one of the biological factors, while africans to three factors of developmental differences. Given sufficient IQ, neoteny and testosterone can somewhat be ameliorated. But that is not possible without positive eugenics in the short term or negative eugenics in the long.

    Incarceration is visible but the smallest consequence of forced integration. We have lost so much of our civil society, our commons, our manners, ethics and morals, due to attempts at heterogeneous polities. You have to go to norway today to experience the difference. Finns are ‘different’, so they are an unfair comparison. But the germanic peoples all together from italy to norway were a very special people before forced integration. And this century has been a curse for us for reasons some of us fully understand. The freed slaves precisely the damage the protestants warned against. The catholics were precisely the political damage the protestants warned against. The jews were ten times the damage the protestants warned against. The opening of immigration by the left in 65, as ten times the damage the protestants and catholics warned against.

    The experiment has failed. Democracy failed. Globalism failed. The belief that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated like all other animals failed. We debate whether we domesticated the dog, or it domesticated itself. We do not face the rather obvious genetic evidence, that we domesticated ourselves. And that we did so by some groups being more domesticated and therefore better organized and cooperative than others.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 08:57:00 UTC

  • Marxism started just like we have. We are online. They were in cafes writing pam

    Marxism started just like we have. We are online. They were in cafes writing pamphlets. We are in the states, canada, australia, and europe. They were in france, germany, spain, italy, and russia.

    It’s just a few men scribbling back and forth until they create an intellectual product of sufficient political utility that they satisfy the era’s demand for a solution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 10:45:00 UTC

  • WHAT DO THESE RELIGIOUS TERMS MEAN? You won’t like the answers…. What do the r

    WHAT DO THESE RELIGIOUS TERMS MEAN?

    You won’t like the answers….

    What do the rituals mean? Membership Fees.

    What is sacrament? Debt Creation.

    What is atonement? Debt Repayment.

    What is baptism? Debt Forgiveness

    What is the priesthood? Accountant.

    I told you that you wouldn’t like the answers. All these ‘fancy words’ are code words for debt for creatures who are extremely sensitive to proportionality. (reciprocity).

    Christianity consists uniquely of just the rules I stated, respect for the women and slaves, in retaliation against tripartism and aristocracy, and nothing else. Everything else is simply our pre-literate western tradition

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 14:46:00 UTC

  • CAN WE ELIMINATE RELIGION? NOT REALLY, BUT THAT REQUIRES WE DEFINE RELIGION AS M

    CAN WE ELIMINATE RELIGION? NOT REALLY, BUT THAT REQUIRES WE DEFINE RELIGION AS MARKET DEMANDS RATHER THAN THE CURRENT MEANS OF PRODUCTION.

    —“However unrealistic of a goal it might be, wouldn’t the ideal situation be a world without organised religion? Or is there some benefit to religion that I’m not seeing?”—Dann Hopkins

    Religion is just education. that’s all. Period. The ‘trick’ of both church and state is to claim church does no education, or that state education is sufficient.

    We need training in physical fitness, mindfulness, manners-ethics-morals-rituals (payments to the commons), the laws, the means of calculating that we think of as the 3R’s, the skills to run a household, and the skills for employment.

    It does not, as it once did, provide for physical fitness.

    It provides mindfulness in the personal, interpersonal, and public spheres of life.

    It provides the some of the manners, ethics, morals rituals that are the positive laws of the social order (not negative laws as is law proper).

    It provides a venue for public contract making (this is my child, this is my promise to the community, this is my mate, this is our property, this person has died and his or her property may be distributed).

    It is, to some degree, a computational necessity – meaning that it is very bad not to have that mindfulness.

    It provides child-level parables and myths which are no less a form of calculation about action in the world than are laws, logic, and mathematics.

    But there is no reason we cannot have lessons, parables and mythos and histories for each class of people at each stage of their lives, all of which contain the same messages.

    There is no reason the church rather than the school, post office, or library is not still the center of civic life, and that government is not relegated to the production and maintenance of material commons, just as we keep commerce out of religion.

    So I think I have most of this figured out – not that I am interested in the content in and of itself, but that I understand how to frame the problem, and restore the incentives, such that the second abrahamic dark age does not capture our people.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 12:04:00 UTC

  • THE HOLE IN CHRISTIANITY IS OPENNESS TO NON-KIN – THE SOLUTION, LEGISLATION AGAI

    THE HOLE IN CHRISTIANITY IS OPENNESS TO NON-KIN – THE SOLUTION, LEGISLATION AGAINST INCOMPATIBLE RELIGIONS

    by Jennifer Dean

    The problem with Christianity as I see it is not tolerance – Christians are PLENTY intolerant (in some ways I agree with and others I do not) – the problem is that Christians have an inability to recognize many of the things they are intolerant to, when it comes to outsiders or foreigners, and instead mostly prefer to enforce intolerance on their own kind.

    Look at the Amish to see the most exaggerated example of what I mean, they use shunning and excommunication over the most petty things you could imagine. Rule enforcement for the sake of sheer submission. And while their ability to preserve their way of life is admirable in some ways, obviously it is only possible within a larger context of free riding, and their way of life is all or nothing. T

    hey might seem to be an extreme or unusual example of Christianity, but the same elements of submission and intolerance are present in other denominations, only the others have allowed outsiders to infiltrate and subvert their doctrine.

    I believe legislating Christianity, in this country, would have been a disaster. The fundamental problem is that it is still welcoming of outsiders and converts (civnat at the religious level and indeed, where civnat comes from) for the sake of winning souls to Christ, and THAT is the loophole that outsiders have exploited.

    The better strategy would have been to have legislation AGAINST Judaism, Talmudism, Babylonian mysticism, Satanism, Luciferianism (as we already do have some legislation against Islam, but unfortunately we needed more and what we have has not been enforced) and to educate people on the dangers of these religious ideologies, and their hidden, very real and very very sick practices of human sacrifice (of INNOCENTS – not murderers, criminals, undesirables, but BABIES. CHILDREN.), pedophilia and child marriage. But the problem is due to the convert loophole in Christianity, they simply come in anyway and hide in our midst, and kidnap our children and traffic them.

    (CD: well done)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 11:20:00 UTC

  • (Each civilization relies upon a method of negotiation, persuasion, argument, an

    (Each civilization relies upon a method of negotiation, persuasion, argument, and law, that both in the past and present serves that competitive strategy.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 14:19:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071046427512573953

    Reply addressees: @Hevsa1 @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070965850071420929

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hevsa1

    @curtdoolittle @BretWeinstein Was wondering how long it would take for you to get in on this.👍

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070965850071420929

  • EMMANUEL TODD’S FAMILY STRUCTURES 1. Absolute Nuclear Family: a. Spouse selectio

    EMMANUEL TODD’S FAMILY STRUCTURES

    1. Absolute Nuclear Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy.

    b. Inheritance: Indifference – no precise rules, frequent use of wills.

    c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents.

    d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Anglo-Saxon world, Holland, Denmark.

    e. Representative Ideology: Christianity, Capitalism, `Libertarian’ Liberalism, and Feminism.

    2. Egalitarian Nuclear Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy.

    b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.

    c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents.

    d. Representative Nations, Regions: northern France, northern Italy, central & southern Spain, central Portugal, Greece, Romania, Poland, Latin America, Ethiopia.

    e. Representative Ideology: Christianity (Catholicism); the “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite” form of Liberalism.

    3. Authoritarian Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Parents, little or no marriage between children of brothers.

    b. Inheritance: Anti-Egalitarian – inequality between brothers, transfer of patrimony to one son.

    c. Family Home: cohabitation of the married heir with his parents.

    d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Germany, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Bohemia, Scotland, Ireland, peripheral regions of France, northern (Basque) Spain, northern Portugal, Japan, Korea, Jews, Romany Gypsies.

    e. Representative Ideology: Fascism, various separatist and autonomous (anti-universalist) movements.

    4: Exogamous Community Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Parents, no marriage between the children of two brothers.

    b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.

    c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.

    d. Representative Nations, Regions: Russia, Yugoslavia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland, Albania, central Italy, China, Vietnam, Cuba and north India.

    e. Representative Ideology: Communism, Socialism.

    5. Endogamous Community Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Custom, frequent marriage between the children of brothers.

    b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.

    c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.

    d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Arab world, Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tadzhikistan.

    e. Representative Ideology: Islam.

    6. Asymmetrical Community Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Custom, prohibition on marriages between the children of brothers, but a preference for marriages between the children of brothers and sisters.

    b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.

    c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.

    d. Representative Regions: southern India.

    e. Representative Ideology: Same

    7: Anomic Family:

    a. Spouse selection: Free, but without obligatory exogamy; consanguine marriage possible and sometimes frequent.

    b. Inheritance: Indifference – uncertainty about equality between brothers, inheritance rules egalitarian in theory but uncertain in practice.

    c. Family Home: cohabitation of married children with parents rejected in theory but accepted in practice.

    d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions:

    e. Representative Ideology: Buddhism, Christianity, and Communism, but potentially anything.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 10:27:00 UTC

  • 2) Just because you are getting support and attention, do not assume you have li

    2) Just because you are getting support and attention, do not assume you have license to overreach and hubris. Civilizational differences are in our Laws: Western Empiricism, Easter Wisdom, Indian Mythology, Semitic Fraud (Pilpul/Critique), African Magic, Australian Devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 22:13:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070803463804727298

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    This is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis.

    It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression.

    Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait. https://t.co/DH8e85dlOq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

  • WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES

    WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES?

    (important explanations)

    —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Štěpán

    Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness.

    So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction.

    And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens.

    Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex.

    The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity.

    Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.)

    Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency).

    I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-01 09:34:00 UTC