(FB 1552153817 Timestamp) –“Curt: what if something happens to you?”– a) I am pretty sure once just LAW103 Foundations is done, and LAW203/6 and we have worked through the method, the definitions, and then the long list of applications of that law, we have a purely descriptive science of the psychological and social sciences. I am on the third revision of LAW103 – Foundations, and it is … well it’s where you can understand it pretty easily as a single thing in a hierarchy of applications. And that the number of component parts is just a handful that I could roll off right now with east. I will be done with 103 fairly shortly, and doing so has helped me shorten the book down to something very simple. Between the constitution (which is a chinese menu) , the Course LAW103/LAW203/6, and a book containing both, the work will be rock solid. And it is achievable. And while y’all complain about me taking so long (and I complain too) the time I take matters because it allows me to turn all of this prose into something parsimonious, clear, and accessible to most people by one means or another. b) The Institute owns everything I do other than my software biz which is owned by me and my investors. If anything happens to me all IP goes either to the institute, or to my investors, with a portion of any software profits for my family. c) In the case where something happens to me, the institute, a few people whose names I won’t mention, and the donors will have license to do what they will with the work after I’m gone. d) There are people here today capable of continuing the work. The problem is that I am able for various economic reasons to devote full time to the effort, and they are not. The best people have limited time to devote. My hope would be that the institute will evolve successfully into an online university for teaching this material, and a network of schools and teachers will evolve and will provide income to those people willing and able to continue the work whether contributing or simply persisting it. e) I need to be clear though that my age and health are not in my favor. Even this winter I’ve been questionably effective since maybe mid december because of health issues. But, if I can finish the courses, constitution, and book, and then spend the rest of my time using the same method to produce courses and books I will be productive as long as I am able, and reconstruct the western canon – a full academic program that is defended against the left forever. I have to get into a living condition where i can walk and lift every day but sleep enough every night so that I stay healthy enough to do it. And I’m not keen on abandoning care of my elders to do that. LAW103 – Foundations – The Method (âThe Coreâ) LAW106 Foundations: Man, Law, and Argument LAW206 Application and Reformation It is possible that if I continue making similar progress that law 106 will be just another 3 credits. I can’t easily estimate the work load without completing the course. People might be able to do the work faster than I assume. Law 206 (application to the scope of knowledge) should be a 300 level course i think, and Law 306 a 400 level course, since it involves writing constitutions for different groups of people. After that we then go to comparative legal systems and tear apart constitutions and legal systems on a country by country basis. Once that is donet here will be no legal scholars in the world that can compete with Propertarian Jurists with any excuse other than ‘it’s tradition’. Now that I feel REALLY secure about the Foundations, I feel like the workload for students will drop, because once you get the hang of it I think a lot of this will come more naturally than I expected. I would love to get this into a two year program, and then spend more time on economics, history and war to fill out a degree. But again. I have this work and my software work to do and I’m not 30 years old any longer.
Theme: Institution
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552598259 Timestamp) EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T. I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational. What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world. One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false. These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements. Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others. Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale. This is merely true. God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other. 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others. That’s just the science of it all. I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them. The laws of the universe are the origin of truth aboutt hat universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus. Neither set of rules is complicated. They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552859392 Timestamp) (working my butt off today. Finally settled on institutional organization that gets our goals – all of our goals. but man, when I publish this thing I’m going to go have to go even more off grid – ’cause they’re gonna definitely try to kill me… lol )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552835382 Timestamp) —“Productive conflict results in enforceable local contracts and meaningful dispute resolutions, eliminating the need for a grand moral contracts like equality to compensate for local shortcomings.”–Pat Ryan (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552859392 Timestamp) (working my butt off today. Finally settled on institutional organization that gets our goals – all of our goals. but man, when I publish this thing I’m going to go have to go even more off grid – ’cause they’re gonna definitely try to kill me… lol )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553024831 Timestamp) —“Contact Us Message: I would very much like to interview a representative of the institute. I will be interviewing John Mark in early April. Keep up the good work.”— (Strategy) If your question is political and strategic then best to ask John Mark. (Methodology) If your question is about our methodology, it’s best to ask Brandon Hayes. I think he will do the best job. I can give a dozen other names but at present I like to give Brandon some worthy attention. I doubt you can ask a question that requires my response that will survive on air. (Christianity) If your question is about our relationship to christianity it’s best to ask James Fox Higgins. I don’t know anyone who understand my position better than he does. Aristotelianism (science), Christianity, Paganism (our old gods) and Heathenism(our germanic myths and tales) are inseparable from our civilization. They must stay. My concern is providing a reformed version of christianity going forward that eliminates marxism, postmodernism, and feminism, and provides a european church for each segment of our peoples. My problem has been an inability to restore the christian church to its central position in opposition to the state. I can find no means of doing so. This was the reason for my many attacks on the church. I was looking for a way to do so. But it’s just not possible.Christian wisdom is insufficient a replacement for christian faith because faith is too necessary to too many for reasons of genetics we cannot escape. (For transparency: I may be ‘christian’ in the scientific sense, a deist in the jeffersonian sense, but I am christian last among science(truth), heathen (nature), Pagan(heroes), and Christianity (love).) ===
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553024831 Timestamp) —“Contact Us Message: I would very much like to interview a representative of the institute. I will be interviewing John Mark in early April. Keep up the good work.”— (Strategy) If your question is political and strategic then best to ask John Mark. (Methodology) If your question is about our methodology, it’s best to ask Brandon Hayes. I think he will do the best job. I can give a dozen other names but at present I like to give Brandon some worthy attention. I doubt you can ask a question that requires my response that will survive on air. (Christianity) If your question is about our relationship to christianity it’s best to ask James Fox Higgins. I don’t know anyone who understand my position better than he does. Aristotelianism (science), Christianity, Paganism (our old gods) and Heathenism(our germanic myths and tales) are inseparable from our civilization. They must stay. My concern is providing a reformed version of christianity going forward that eliminates marxism, postmodernism, and feminism, and provides a european church for each segment of our peoples. My problem has been an inability to restore the christian church to its central position in opposition to the state. I can find no means of doing so. This was the reason for my many attacks on the church. I was looking for a way to do so. But it’s just not possible.Christian wisdom is insufficient a replacement for christian faith because faith is too necessary to too many for reasons of genetics we cannot escape. (For transparency: I may be ‘christian’ in the scientific sense, a deist in the jeffersonian sense, but I am christian last among science(truth), heathen (nature), Pagan(heroes), and Christianity (love).) ===
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553101370 Timestamp) YES YOU CAN USE A FAKE NAME (ALIAS) WITH THE INSTITUTE WHEN TAKING COURSES —“I want to participate in the courses, but I’m a bit concerned that putting in my real name will mean I’ll end up on some list that Antifa publishes after the Institute falls prey to hacking. Perhaps a topic worthwhile addressing on your timeline as well.”— A Friend (a) we don’t want to have to rely on dipshit aliases and user names. Just make up an alias that looks like a real name. Use it to register. (b) if we achieve accreditation then we can always change the name on issuing credits, certifications, and degrees. Ok? See…. 😉 (NOTE: this content added to site FAQ under Home > FAQ’s )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553101370 Timestamp) YES YOU CAN USE A FAKE NAME (ALIAS) WITH THE INSTITUTE WHEN TAKING COURSES —“I want to participate in the courses, but I’m a bit concerned that putting in my real name will mean I’ll end up on some list that Antifa publishes after the Institute falls prey to hacking. Perhaps a topic worthwhile addressing on your timeline as well.”— A Friend (a) we don’t want to have to rely on dipshit aliases and user names. Just make up an alias that looks like a real name. Use it to register. (b) if we achieve accreditation then we can always change the name on issuing credits, certifications, and degrees. Ok? See…. 😉 (NOTE: this content added to site FAQ under Home > FAQ’s )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553179189 Timestamp) HOW WE DESTROY OUR CIVIL SOCIETY by Curt Doolittle As someone who has gone from middle class to 1%’er and retired in his 40’s, money was absolutely no use to me OTHER than signal value. For people with limited ability, money reduces stress. For those of us with ability it does nothing. I have seen no evidence to date that anything over median + 20% produces increased happiness. All we do is purchase cars, homes, and vacations with greater signal value. The primary value of money is (UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH WARNING:) to separate yourself from people you don’t want to be around – because we have no right of voluntary disassociation. This is, in my opinion, the primary problem of multiculturalism: it is not possible to separate EXCEPT by economic cost, which means we abandon the middle, lower middle, working, and laboring classes to association with undesirables. In other words, we cannot judge people by their character and therefore admit them to schools, neighborhoods and businesses (or politics) but we simply put economic sorting in place which because of immigration destroys our middle and working classes. Involuntary Association Is Not A Market Action nor is it commensurable with the Natural Law of Reciprocity. Nor peaceful harmonious coexistence.