Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • “Strong nations are made of strong communities. Strong communities are made of s

    —“Strong nations are made of strong communities. Strong communities are made of strong families. Attacking the family is attacking the nation. Hence, feminism, gender dysphoria, porn, women in the workplace etc.”– Claire Elise II

    EXACTLY… moreover, family, extended family, and community TRAIN DEVELOPMENT when most of these issues are developmental because of (a) schools are bad for people and (b) they are not being socialized (trained), and their going crazy and becoming maladapted, because they’re developmentally being disabled.

    Why? because of “You are a precious individual snowflake needing to express your uniqueness”, rather than a bunch of randomly rolled genes needing to be trained so that you’re a functioning adult able to train the next generation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:51:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508076336583165

  • ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY. —“I’m not su

    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY.

    —“I’m not sure how pointing out that religions institutionalize echo chambers, in a conversation about echo chambers, means anything like whatever you just said. I’m concerned with ideological homogeneity in all forms. That’s why I criticize it”—

    Good point. So what about ideological competition vs simple truth and reciprocity in everything? In other words what is the purpose of ideology other than power under democracy, philosophy other than power under aristocracy, religion in opposition to aristocracy? Why any of them?

    As far as I know sophism, pseudoscience, fraud, ideology, philosophy, theology, are just means of avoiding engaging in private (economy) and public markets (politics), in order to obtain something by stealing it rather than trading for it. This problem is undermining democracy.

    So, we all create echo chambers and most of the literature, especially in behavioral economics, focuses on various forms of selection bias. The thing is that it’s NECESSARY because groups have different degrees of agency, and the commons is saturated with undecidable falsehoods.

    Those of us with the necessary talents are as ignorant of the demands of the common people given our market for falsehoods, as they are limited by dunning kruger in falsifying them. ie: networks of common paradigms are necessary. Our only universal is law of tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508065836578181

  • Those rules create both positive and negative consequences: high trust society t

    Those rules create both positive and negative consequences: high trust society that can build large productive commons and low corruption institutions – at the cost of pathological altruism for the world’s least kin selected people, making them vulnerable to non-violent enemies.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-25 23:55:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154540679017553920

    Reply addressees: @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154540098375028736

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EPoe187 Christianity in 5 rules: the eradication of hatred from the human heart. The extension of familial love to all. The demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment. Faith in doing so despite the risk and cost

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154540098375028736

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EPoe187 Christianity in 5 rules: the eradication of hatred from the human heart. The extension of familial love to all. The demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment. Faith in doing so despite the risk and cost

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154540098375028736

  • These people scare me. At least the major religions have survived the test of ti

    These people scare me. At least the major religions have survived the test of time. Their probably more cancerous for that reason. But they tend to limit the crazies to institutionalized craziness.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-20 15:07:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152595839208099840

    Reply addressees: @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152152841412382720

    IN REPLY TO:

    @RichardDawkins

    I’ve often marvelled at the motivation of morons like this, & here we have a clue. It’s the feeling of community, of warm fellowship with like-minded inhabitants of the echo-chamber. No doubt the same factor is at work in less obviously absurd delusions
    https://t.co/UZaFR5cvxx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152152841412382720

  • LIBERTARD ANCAPITARD FOOLS FOR (((FALSE))) DICHOTOMY —“Govt helping business i

    LIBERTARD ANCAPITARD FOOLS FOR (((FALSE))) DICHOTOMY

    —“Govt helping business isn’t #capitalism Know this. Grasp this. Learn this.”—

    You mean like providing limited liability? Or providing rule of law, courts, generating trust, risk tolerance, and the market and monetary velocity the results from it? You mean like providing commons despite the problem of free riders, parasites, those who privatize public goods and socialize private losses? You mean that every major country’s competitive advantage WASN’T a product of private-state partnership?

    Democratic Governments sell rents. Bureaucratic employees seek rents. Solve the problem of selling rents.

    The problem isn’t state (defense) or government (production of commons) but corruption and rent seeking.

    The problem is democracy, and deprivation of standing in matters of the commons before the courts.
    Otherwise we would have this country cleaned up by Tuesday.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:33:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442652470992882

  • @TomKawczynski Can you define traditionalism in some way that is actionable ; so

    @TomKawczynski Can you define traditionalism in some way that is actionable ; some way that can be embedded in institutions of government; that provides incentives to those in government to act according to the definitions; and some way that doesn’t require anyone with above a room temperature IQ to profess conviction for a rather obvious string of falsehoods and lies.

    This isnt a fight for sentiments, or ideas, but against culture-cide, genocide and a repeat of the dark ages of ignorance.

    Either we apply organized violence as did the founding fathers to produce an organ of state that suits our interests or we’re repeating the wishful thinking of those christian men who came before us, and were made fools by history for their optimism in man.

    all that matters is if people show up to fight.

    Everything else is ritual sedation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 00:32:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102431324043571219

  • 2) Adverse possession: in land disputes you may claim adverse possession (taking

    2) Adverse possession: in land disputes you may claim adverse possession (taking of others property) by capital investment in it (maintenance) if it is not against their interests (does not cause harm), is public (visible, known), and for one more more decades (a long time).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:03:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149665604510502913

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149662309897211908

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    1) Complex test of natural law. Eggs deposited for safekeeping. Clinic accidentally commits an involuntary transfer. The birth mother unknowing recipient. The birth mother paying the costs of the involuntary transfer. Restitution to be paid by clinic. vs fence borders cases… https://twitter.com/sarahzhang/status/1149359060992614400

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149662309897211908

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    1) Complex test of natural law. Eggs deposited for safekeeping. Clinic accidentally commits an involuntary transfer. The birth mother unknowing recipient. The birth mother paying the costs of the involuntary transfer. Restitution to be paid by clinic. vs fence borders cases… https://t.co/4onOLD1ePL

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149662309897211908

  • Jun 27, 2019, 6:31 PM CONTINUING THE BRITISH EMPIRE’S POLICING OF INTERNATIONAL

    Jun 27, 2019, 6:31 PM
    CONTINUING THE BRITISH EMPIRE’S POLICING OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT, FINANCE AND TRADE – THAT’S WHY

    So that europe could recover and rebuild (they hate us anyway). So that world communism could run its course (fking idiots still didn’t learn). So that world Islamism can run its course (they aren’t white this time so it’s even worse.)

    Why do you think we shouldn’t have (a) resisted the spread of communism to the main source of oil in the pre-2000 world (b) continued the british empires defense of finance and trade in the gulf, (c) made a “special agreement” with the house of Saud to preserver her sovereignty in exchange for controlling the world price of oil, (d) prevented iran from developing a bourse and becoming a dangerous islamic fundamentalist world power controlling half of the world’s oil, (d) used israel as a base of intelligence and military operations for all of the above????

    Why on earth do I waste my time with f*king people who think decisions in world affairs are akin to schoolgirl moralisms between neighbors??????

    The government and media talk to you like you’re stupid using moralisms and righteousness rather than economics and global strategy – because you are stupid.

    STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH “STUPID”.
    Yes, you’re well intentioned, but ignorant and stupid.

    ASK, DON’T TELL.
    You do not have the ability or knowledge to ‘tell’.

    (rant off)
    – Curt

    ( Thank you (and f*k you) very much. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:10:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426283758247824

  • THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS Markets are necessary for the production of inves

    THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS

    Markets are necessary for the production of investments in commons among peoples with uncommon means, uncommon interests, and limited interests to invest. It allows uncommon interests to cooperate by uncommon means, on uncommon ends.

    Voting is only useful for the choice of priority of investments in commons, amongst a group with common means and interest, given limited resources to invest. It allows common interests to cooperate, by common means, on common ends.

    Rule is only useful for the choice of the production of commons in pursuit of a singular design of future conditions, by directing the greatest concentration of resources behind the most direct means of achieving that end.

    Dictatorship is only useful in times of war, when the entirety of the people, their capital, and the territory must be allocated to the production of victory.

    Historically speaking, Durable commons are best produced by monarchy; voting to limit the raising expansion of fees (taxes); and Markets for the production of private goods and services.

    The optimal form of government is the one that makes use of each of these orders only for the circumstances for which it is useful.

    The only possible insurer of that process is a monarchy, professional warriors, and a militia whose franchise depends upon it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:57:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426231781425441

  • TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY —“What are your tho

    TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY

    —“What are your thoughts in this case and specifically how it relates to tournament species v. pair bonding species. When society has comfortable stores and capital, where does that leave the pair bonded class compared to the tournament class of human. Considering both male and female it would be common to see the tournament class dominate every time. How does the pair bonded male compete and in socialist arena where the female is taken care of by the greater part of society? Is the socialist economical model naturally doomed by progress of the human condition to become a communal type and deficit living situation?”—Craig Michael

    1. Restore political reciprocity (eliminate redistributions).
    2. Restore voluntary disassociation and association.
    3. Eliminate interest on consumer credit.
    4. Restore the Militia, Regiment and Barracks system (soak up men) and the WPA so we have defense, emergency, and commons production programs for single males.
    5. Enact singapore retirement that is non-attachable or transferrable.
    6. Convert legal marriage to an exchange of limited powers of attorney, and private contract.(what it legally exists as)
    7. Restore the legal definition of ‘marriage’ to a publicly subsidized corporation for the intergeneration production of children.(which is what it exists as)
    8. Restore fault divorce, and restitution for interference in a marriage (make cheating extremely expensive).
    9. Eliminate Alimony, Support, Common property. (restore male contributory portability)
    10. Restore the primacy of policy to family rather than individual.
    11. Eliminate the marriage penalty and maintain the individual penalty (increased taxes on unmarried childless).

    You cannot fix the natural differences between males and females but you can stop the damage we have done to the production of the institution of marriage as a corporation for reproduction production insurance and care.

    TOURNAMENT SPECIES.
    –“Tournament species in zoology are those species in which members of one sex (usually males) compete in order to mate. In tournament species, the reproductive success of the small group of competition winners is predominantly higher than that of the large group of losers.”—

    PAIR BONDING SPECIES
    —“In biology, a pair bond is the strong affinity that develops in some species between a pair consisting of a male and female, or in some cases as a same-sex pairing, potentially leading to producing offspring and/or a lifelong bond.”—

    DISTRIBUTION
    —“Humans are a hybrid between the two, and different individuals fall into different places on the spectrum of pair-bonding vs. tournament. And, tournament women will pretend to be pair bonding to increase their reproductive success, and pair-bonding trending men will adapt themselves to be more tournament-oriented (TheRedPill/Pickup Game is basically all of these).—Anon

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426185858126992