Theme: Institution

  • Alternative Government Possibility

    May 1, 2020, 10:30 AM I know I’ve focused on markets and decentralization but I haven’t taken it as far as the ancients and medievals. During the pre-state, ancient and medieval periods, our tri-functionalism manifested in interesting divisions of labor. In the ancient period the temples and priests served as banks. Education was a private and commercial activity.The military ruled, and the law regulated military, commerce, and religion. In the middle ages, the church collected tithes, the state collected taxes. the commercial sector collected profits. They law was a profession of varying degrees of respect – with judges always due respect. In the modern period we have collapsed church, education, commerce, government, and military into a single political body: the government – A Monopoly. But the temporal division of labor between church-education-family, commerce-banking-finance, and miltary-strategy-infrastructure, as well as the capital each measures is different. What about three separately funded? 1) the military, judiciary, and sheriffs from taxes, 2) The treasury and infrastructure from income on investments; and 3) social services from ‘tithes’ (taxes). This would assist in de-politicizing the polity. ( I had tried very hard to discover a means to return the family: banking, education, and healthcare to the church but fundamentalists have made this impossible. )

  • Alternative Government Possibility

    May 1, 2020, 10:30 AM I know I’ve focused on markets and decentralization but I haven’t taken it as far as the ancients and medievals. During the pre-state, ancient and medieval periods, our tri-functionalism manifested in interesting divisions of labor. In the ancient period the temples and priests served as banks. Education was a private and commercial activity.The military ruled, and the law regulated military, commerce, and religion. In the middle ages, the church collected tithes, the state collected taxes. the commercial sector collected profits. They law was a profession of varying degrees of respect – with judges always due respect. In the modern period we have collapsed church, education, commerce, government, and military into a single political body: the government – A Monopoly. But the temporal division of labor between church-education-family, commerce-banking-finance, and miltary-strategy-infrastructure, as well as the capital each measures is different. What about three separately funded? 1) the military, judiciary, and sheriffs from taxes, 2) The treasury and infrastructure from income on investments; and 3) social services from ‘tithes’ (taxes). This would assist in de-politicizing the polity. ( I had tried very hard to discover a means to return the family: banking, education, and healthcare to the church but fundamentalists have made this impossible. )

  • Why Do Governments and Courts and Markets and Militias Exist?

    May 1, 2020, 8:30 PM (Answer: b/c of Multipliers) Government creates a market for central corruption in exchange for suppression of local corruption, with the dividend for the citizenry produced by reduced transaction costs and increased economic velocity, producing reduced costs. That’s what government does. That’s why we have it. That’s why it’s required. Conversely, the court, using law of tort, creates a market for the suppression of market corruption and government corruption as long as law is equally applied to all – except the judge of last resort (Monarch) in extreme circumstances. So governments use force to collect taxes, to pay for the suppression of local free riding, corruption, and crime, and external military, economic, informational, and demographic warfare. The only fault in this system is lack of universal standing in the prosecution of the members of the government, the court, and their agents. Which is why we must have the militia to demand that universal standing, and the enforcement of our law of tort. Edit

  • Why Do Governments and Courts and Markets and Militias Exist?

    May 1, 2020, 8:30 PM (Answer: b/c of Multipliers) Government creates a market for central corruption in exchange for suppression of local corruption, with the dividend for the citizenry produced by reduced transaction costs and increased economic velocity, producing reduced costs. That’s what government does. That’s why we have it. That’s why it’s required. Conversely, the court, using law of tort, creates a market for the suppression of market corruption and government corruption as long as law is equally applied to all – except the judge of last resort (Monarch) in extreme circumstances. So governments use force to collect taxes, to pay for the suppression of local free riding, corruption, and crime, and external military, economic, informational, and demographic warfare. The only fault in this system is lack of universal standing in the prosecution of the members of the government, the court, and their agents. Which is why we must have the militia to demand that universal standing, and the enforcement of our law of tort. Edit

  • That’s Our Unity with P

    THAT’S OUR UNITY WITH P by Jay AmeriSor P is actually very inclusive with the key being is that whoever participants from the different camps/tribes/clans they must be disciplined to follow P bylaws. You can be multiethnic, multi-religious, and variances of gifts/talents. Meaning stay within your in-group “clubs, cults, gossip circles” when expressing your cultural, religious, cognitively bias preferences. BUT, when within the commons you speak only one language, and it’s law is supreme “P RECIPROCITY.” That’s our unity sanctuary. That’s how we compromise and prosper and not destroy our ancestral heritage.

  • That’s Our Unity with P

    THAT’S OUR UNITY WITH P by Jay AmeriSor P is actually very inclusive with the key being is that whoever participants from the different camps/tribes/clans they must be disciplined to follow P bylaws. You can be multiethnic, multi-religious, and variances of gifts/talents. Meaning stay within your in-group “clubs, cults, gossip circles” when expressing your cultural, religious, cognitively bias preferences. BUT, when within the commons you speak only one language, and it’s law is supreme “P RECIPROCITY.” That’s our unity sanctuary. That’s how we compromise and prosper and not destroy our ancestral heritage.

  • Ok. We’ll happily take back all our institutions, science, technology and medici

    Ok. We’ll happily take back all our institutions, science, technology and medicine and reduce you primitives back to the dark ages… lol


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259111340628684801

    Reply addressees: @JazzUpNow @Garou_Hidalgo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259099911083048961

  • But the industrial cities are integrated ito the world and do not need defense.

    But the industrial cities are integrated ito the world and do not need defense. The north needs strong military and defense to keep the industrial cities integrated. Poor government in the north, wealthy trade in the north. This is what Mao feared. He was wrong.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:05:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259107117073608708

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259106715737427968


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HaiTaoYang9 America will break into pieces. Europe will not unify. Why? Because it is a disadvantage. The only value of scale is military. For china, the only advantage of scale is to use wealthy south industrial cities to raise up the poor rest of the country.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259106715737427968

  • (They couldn’t hold it because they couldn’t create administration.Same for arab

    (They couldn’t hold it because they couldn’t create administration.Same for arabs. Raiders succeed because they have no institutions to defend and pay for. They fail because they cannot develop institutions. West, india, and far east succeeded. The middle east died by the arabs.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:48:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259103033985847296

    Reply addressees: @pinkunicorntank @VonS44415768

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259101838948925445

  • I emphasize religion because you don’t understand that your ‘religion’ (binding

    I emphasize religion because you don’t understand that your ‘religion’ (binding narrative) is nation to justify monopoly bureaucracy. Our ‘religion’ is abstract, to maintain harmony despite a market of many small competing states. Chinese are low trust and can’t understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259100120731258880

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259099194888908800